Add symlink test for resolv.conf restore
We replace the base resolv.conf with an "outside" copy so that resolving works when we're in the chroot. Installing resolvconf package modifies the in-chroot resolv.conf to a symlink (to /var/run) which it wants maintained in the final image. We have the existing "immutable" check for a created resolv.conf file, but no eqivalent for a symlink. This adds a check to see if the resolv.conf is a symlink and leave it alone if it is, assuming it has been re-created in the chroot. I have tested this with ubuntu-minimal+resolvconf with dhcp-all-interfaces and the system seems to work with resolvconf working correctly. Change-Id: Idd5a26e9d55979bd951577d5b098ed4bfba91ad3
This commit is contained in:
parent
f8106b2ec0
commit
5fa6e3e13c
@ -104,8 +104,15 @@ function run_d_in_target () {
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
function finalise_base () {
|
function finalise_base () {
|
||||||
TARGET_ROOT=$TMP_MOUNT_PATH run_d cleanup
|
TARGET_ROOT=$TMP_MOUNT_PATH run_d cleanup
|
||||||
# If the file has been set immutable, we probably want to keep it
|
# In create_base() we replaced/created the initial resolv.conf
|
||||||
if lsattr $TMP_MOUNT_PATH/etc/resolv.conf | grep '^....i' >/dev/null ; then
|
# inside the image with a copy of the "outside" version so that
|
||||||
|
# resolving during the build will work.
|
||||||
|
#
|
||||||
|
# If that file has been replace with a symlink (resolvconf package
|
||||||
|
# can do this), or marked immutable, then don't restore the
|
||||||
|
# original version, just leave it alone.
|
||||||
|
if [ -L $TMP_MOUNT_PATH/etc/resolv.conf ] || \
|
||||||
|
lsattr $TMP_MOUNT_PATH/etc/resolv.conf | grep '^....i' >/dev/null ; then
|
||||||
# We're keeping the contents of resolv.conf set in the elements,
|
# We're keeping the contents of resolv.conf set in the elements,
|
||||||
# so remove the old saved file
|
# so remove the old saved file
|
||||||
sudo rm -f $TMP_MOUNT_PATH/etc/resolv.conf.ORIG
|
sudo rm -f $TMP_MOUNT_PATH/etc/resolv.conf.ORIG
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user