There is some confusion in the readme's over what is happening. The
original change (Iaf46c8e61bf1cac9a096cbfd75d6d6a9111b701e) split out
debian-minimal and made debian "... simply be a collection of the
extra things we do to make it look like a cloud-init based cloud
image"
Make this clearer in the documentation
Change-Id: Ibe6fad9c67b70a5e31e43e06419968135174fef3
This patch removes three nearly-copies of debootstrap documentation
and fixes some documentation aspects.
Change-Id: Ief7794f5c1abad73788c063af6c862472cd34744
Signed-off-by: Andreas Florath <andreas@florath.net>
Sphix 1.5 (I9e7261c4124b71eeb6bddd9e21747b61bbdc16fa) includes
"warning-is-error" which supersedes pbr's warnerrors. Enable this and
fix up the resulting failures
- trailing lines for lists in element_deps directive
- missing README's that are linked
- syntax error and highlighting in building instructions
Change-Id: I6549551b4a9bf47076c9811a7a38a666cbea2a50
Currently there is no description of dependencies in the generated
documentation of the elements: therefore a user of an element does not
know which other elements are automatically included and e.g. which
configuration options are available. In addition there are some
copy&pastes of parts of the README.rst scattered thought different
Ubuntu and Debian specific elements.
This patch adds a semi-automatic generation of dependency information
of all elements. Nevertheless these are not automatically included.
The author of the element's README.rst can decide if and where the
dependency information should appear and can use the descriptor
.. element_deps::
for this.
This patch adds the dependency information for some Debian and
Ubuntu patches - and creates the base for later removing the
duplicated parts.
A call is added to element_dependencies._find_all_elements() to
populate reverse dependencies for Element objects.
(This is a reworking of I31d2b6050b6c46fefe37378698e9a330025db430 for
the feature/v2 branch)
Change-Id: Iebb83916fed71565071246baa550849eef40560b
Currently we have all our elements and library files in a top-level
directory and install them into
<root>/share/diskimage-builder/[elements|lib] (where root is either /
or the root of a virtualenv).
The problem with this is that editable/development installs (pip -e)
do *not* install data_files. Thus we have no canonical location to
look for elements -- leading to the various odd things we do such as a
whole bunch of guessing at the top of disk-image-create and having a
special test-loader in tests/test_elements.py so we can run python
unit tests on those elements that have it.
data_files is really the wrong thing to use for what are essentially
assets of the program. data_files install works well for things like
config-files, init.d files or dropping documentation files.
By moving the elements under the diskimage_builder package, we always
know where they are relative to where we import from. In fact,
pkg_resources has an api for this which we wrap in the new
diskimage_builder/paths.py helper [1].
We use this helper to find the correct path in the couple of places we
need to find the base-elements dir, and for the paths to import the
library shell functions.
Elements such as svc-map and pkg-map include python unit-tests, which
we do not need tests/test_elements.py to special-case load any more.
They just get found automatically by the normal subunit loader.
I have a follow-on change (I69ca3d26fede0506a6353c077c69f735c8d84d28)
to move disk-image-create to a regular python entry-point.
Unfortunately, this has to move to work with setuptools. You'd think
a symlink under diskimage_builder/[elements|lib] would work, but it
doesn't.
[1] this API handles stuff like getting files out of .zip archive
modules, which we don't do. Essentially for us it's returning
__file__.
Change-Id: I5e3e3c97f385b1a4ff2031a161a55b231895df5b
