For centos stream, the $releasever is just the major version. Several
of our .repo files are using $releasever in their path, and I think
that 8-stream installs are actually using 8 repos to install from.
For 9-stream, which doesn't have a corresponding 9, we're getting
errors enabling some of the aarch64 tests.
Replace all the $releasever expansions in the .repo files with the
exact version they are being installed for. They don't need to be
generic; we are installing these specific repos for each DIB_RELEASE,
so they don't mix-and-match.
Change-Id: I48d438d8f51280cd060433fc8a67358d8345287f
CentOS Stream 9 is close to be released, and official mirrors are
already poplated. This patch is adding support to centos-minimal in CS9.
Also enable centos-minimal/[8,9]-stream-build-succeeds tests.
This patch is being tested together with [1] to apply following list of elements:
vm centos-minimal simple-init growroot nodepool-base openstack-repos infra-package-needs
[1] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-config/+/811442
Change-Id: Iecf7f7e4c992bb23437b6461cdd04cdca96aafa6
This patch adds support for CentOS 8 Stream [1] to the centos-minimal
element. Users should set DIB_RELEASE=8-stream.
[1] https://www.centos.org/stream/
Change-Id: Id0825de735ab957c10daf35fb3c641f850cc6847
The repo format has slightly changed for CentOS 8 (s/os/baseos/).
Make the chroot builder look for a more specific repos.d directory
first named for the distro variable, then fall back to to top-level
dir (this avoids having to constantly change fedora).
Update the gate mirror setup and roles for new Centos 8 paths too.
Change-Id: I5b7f0c3624cac1d7aa7ed8bf6286b85d808b9c9a
Currently we have all our elements and library files in a top-level
directory and install them into
<root>/share/diskimage-builder/[elements|lib] (where root is either /
or the root of a virtualenv).
The problem with this is that editable/development installs (pip -e)
do *not* install data_files. Thus we have no canonical location to
look for elements -- leading to the various odd things we do such as a
whole bunch of guessing at the top of disk-image-create and having a
special test-loader in tests/test_elements.py so we can run python
unit tests on those elements that have it.
data_files is really the wrong thing to use for what are essentially
assets of the program. data_files install works well for things like
config-files, init.d files or dropping documentation files.
By moving the elements under the diskimage_builder package, we always
know where they are relative to where we import from. In fact,
pkg_resources has an api for this which we wrap in the new
diskimage_builder/paths.py helper [1].
We use this helper to find the correct path in the couple of places we
need to find the base-elements dir, and for the paths to import the
library shell functions.
Elements such as svc-map and pkg-map include python unit-tests, which
we do not need tests/test_elements.py to special-case load any more.
They just get found automatically by the normal subunit loader.
I have a follow-on change (I69ca3d26fede0506a6353c077c69f735c8d84d28)
to move disk-image-create to a regular python entry-point.
Unfortunately, this has to move to work with setuptools. You'd think
a symlink under diskimage_builder/[elements|lib] would work, but it
doesn't.
[1] this API handles stuff like getting files out of .zip archive
modules, which we don't do. Essentially for us it's returning
__file__.
Change-Id: I5e3e3c97f385b1a4ff2031a161a55b231895df5b
