Commit graph

5 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Yolanda Robla
bfc60958bf Fix bootloader packages for rhel
When using uefi in rhel, the package mapping is incorrect.
We need to add specific grub-efi* mappings to use grub2-efi

Change-Id: I2db96ae85fd5e4638c794015b2f8164c018420e3
2018-06-08 17:14:19 +02:00
Ian Wienand
7b4c8abce3 Choose appropriate bootloader for block-device
In the prior change we added block-device-[mbr|gpt|efi] elements to
create appropriate disk-layouts.

This adds an environment flag to each so the bootloader can install
the right thing.  The EFI install path is updated to work with this
(this part a copy of I572937945adbb5adaa5cb09200752e323c2c9531)

We do some basic sanity checking in the block-device elements;
e.g. mbr is not suitable for aarch64, and efi is not suitable for
power.

This updates the bootloader to install EFI where appropriate

Co-Authored-By: Marcin Juszkiewicz <marcin.juszkiewicz@linaro.org>
Change-Id: Ib80acbfd9a12efd976c3fa15a5d1081eb0799305
2018-02-23 10:04:44 +11:00
Chhavi Agarwal
6d69d7909d Support for Cloud Images on ppc64le for rhel7 and centos7
In order to support {CentOS,RHEL}7 for building cloud images we need to
handle the differences in grub packaging from Ubuntu.  We also need to
populate the defualt location for cloud images for CentOS builds.

Change-Id: Ie0d82ff21a42b08c4cb94b7a5635f80bfabf684e
2017-06-29 15:44:26 +10:00
Dirk Mueller
f039a9b796 drop deprecated map-services/packages from zypper element
Change-Id: Ie3065dcc6aefccba93c02085e9977681d1b0535c
2017-05-25 23:43:21 +02:00
Ian Wienand
97c01e48ed Move elements & lib relative to diskimage_builder package
Currently we have all our elements and library files in a top-level
directory and install them into
<root>/share/diskimage-builder/[elements|lib] (where root is either /
or the root of a virtualenv).

The problem with this is that editable/development installs (pip -e)
do *not* install data_files.  Thus we have no canonical location to
look for elements -- leading to the various odd things we do such as a
whole bunch of guessing at the top of disk-image-create and having a
special test-loader in tests/test_elements.py so we can run python
unit tests on those elements that have it.

data_files is really the wrong thing to use for what are essentially
assets of the program.  data_files install works well for things like
config-files, init.d files or dropping documentation files.

By moving the elements under the diskimage_builder package, we always
know where they are relative to where we import from.  In fact,
pkg_resources has an api for this which we wrap in the new
diskimage_builder/paths.py helper [1].

We use this helper to find the correct path in the couple of places we
need to find the base-elements dir, and for the paths to import the
library shell functions.

Elements such as svc-map and pkg-map include python unit-tests, which
we do not need tests/test_elements.py to special-case load any more.
They just get found automatically by the normal subunit loader.

I have a follow-on change (I69ca3d26fede0506a6353c077c69f735c8d84d28)
to move disk-image-create to a regular python entry-point.

Unfortunately, this has to move to work with setuptools.  You'd think
a symlink under diskimage_builder/[elements|lib] would work, but it
doesn't.

[1] this API handles stuff like getting files out of .zip archive
modules, which we don't do.  Essentially for us it's returning
__file__.

Change-Id: I5e3e3c97f385b1a4ff2031a161a55b231895df5b
2016-11-01 17:27:41 -07:00
Renamed from elements/bootloader/pkg-map (Browse further)