CentOS Stream 9 is close to be released, and official mirrors are
already poplated. This patch is adding support to centos-minimal in CS9.
Also enable centos-minimal/[8,9]-stream-build-succeeds tests.
This patch is being tested together with [1] to apply following list of elements:
vm centos-minimal simple-init growroot nodepool-base openstack-repos infra-package-needs
[1] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-config/+/811442
Change-Id: Iecf7f7e4c992bb23437b6461cdd04cdca96aafa6
As of grub2 >= 2.02-95 on redhat family distros, calling grub2-install
on an EFI partition will fail with: "this utility cannot be used for
EFI platforms because it does not support UEFI Secure Boot."
This version of grub is now in centos8-stream and non-eus repos of
RHEL-8. It is not currently possible to build whole-disk UEFI images
on these distros, and when this package is promoted this will also
affect centos8 and RHEL-8 eus. The grub maintainers made this change
because the grub2-install generated /boot/efi/EFI/BOOT/BOOTX64.EFI
will never be capable of booting with Secure Boot.
This change defines a $EFI_BOOT_DIR for every distro element. When
directory /boot/efi/$EFI_BOOT_DIR exists a grub.cfg file in will be
generated there. This change also installs the shim package on redhat
family distros, which installs a copy of the shim bootloader to
/boot/efi/EFI/BOOT/BOOTX64.EFI. Using centos as an example, this
allows UEFI to boot the shim /boot/efi/EFI/BOOT/BOOTX64.EFI which
then chains to /boot/efi/EFI/centos/grubx64.efi.
If /boot/efi/$EFI_BOOT_DIR doesn't exist (such as for Ubuntu,
/boot/efi/EFI/ubuntu) the current behaviour of running grub-install to
generate /boot/efi/EFI/BOOT/BOOTX64.EFI will continue. For distros
such as Ubutnu where packaging does not populate /boot/efi/EFI/ubuntu
with .efi files, secure boot can be added in the future by copying
.efi files to /boot/efi/EFI/ubuntu and copying the shim file to
/boot/efi/EFI/BOOT/BOOTX64.EFI.
Change-Id: I90925218ff2aa4c4daffcf86e686b6d98d6b0f21
This patch adds support for CentOS 8 Stream [1] to the centos-minimal
element. Users should set DIB_RELEASE=8-stream.
[1] https://www.centos.org/stream/
Change-Id: Id0825de735ab957c10daf35fb3c641f850cc6847
This adds CentOS 8 into functional and boot tests.
This completes centos-minimal support, documentation is updated and a
release note is added.
Change-Id: I435c2967b4f49faeb6d6edf189907b9f96e80357
By default network-scripts package isn't installed, so the directories
for these files don't exist either. Skip by default for Centos 8.
Change-Id: I194ec3735e17f27e586386541dc51f775b01e510
The repo format has slightly changed for CentOS 8 (s/os/baseos/).
Make the chroot builder look for a more specific repos.d directory
first named for the distro variable, then fall back to to top-level
dir (this avoids having to constantly change fedora).
Update the gate mirror setup and roles for new Centos 8 paths too.
Change-Id: I5b7f0c3624cac1d7aa7ed8bf6286b85d808b9c9a
fedora/centos-minimal don't obey DIB_DISTRIBUTION_MIRROR currently. I
don't really want them too -- we want to be able to separate the
mirrors used during the build process from those embedded into the
final image. Add DIB_YUM_MINIMAL_BOOTSTRAP_REPOS which is a directory
with repo files to use during the install.
This introduces setup-gate-mirrors.sh which is intended to setup
repo/sources/whatever files in the openstack gate that point to the
local region mirror. It pulls the info from the mirror_info.sh script
on each CI node.
The openstack-ci-mirrors element is updated to export these variables.
elements are updated to depend on it. Tests are restored
Change-Id: I7604fc4d41cb1483be16b8d628a24e8fc764f515
Currently we have all our elements and library files in a top-level
directory and install them into
<root>/share/diskimage-builder/[elements|lib] (where root is either /
or the root of a virtualenv).
The problem with this is that editable/development installs (pip -e)
do *not* install data_files. Thus we have no canonical location to
look for elements -- leading to the various odd things we do such as a
whole bunch of guessing at the top of disk-image-create and having a
special test-loader in tests/test_elements.py so we can run python
unit tests on those elements that have it.
data_files is really the wrong thing to use for what are essentially
assets of the program. data_files install works well for things like
config-files, init.d files or dropping documentation files.
By moving the elements under the diskimage_builder package, we always
know where they are relative to where we import from. In fact,
pkg_resources has an api for this which we wrap in the new
diskimage_builder/paths.py helper [1].
We use this helper to find the correct path in the couple of places we
need to find the base-elements dir, and for the paths to import the
library shell functions.
Elements such as svc-map and pkg-map include python unit-tests, which
we do not need tests/test_elements.py to special-case load any more.
They just get found automatically by the normal subunit loader.
I have a follow-on change (I69ca3d26fede0506a6353c077c69f735c8d84d28)
to move disk-image-create to a regular python entry-point.
Unfortunately, this has to move to work with setuptools. You'd think
a symlink under diskimage_builder/[elements|lib] would work, but it
doesn't.
[1] this API handles stuff like getting files out of .zip archive
modules, which we don't do. Essentially for us it's returning
__file__.
Change-Id: I5e3e3c97f385b1a4ff2031a161a55b231895df5b
