Rocky Linux is very similar to CentOS 8. CentOS 8 required and forced
NetworkManager with glean so we update dib to do the same for Rocky.
Change-Id: I145e57d61059c2f34dc2d4810e83809b71c6aade
This patch adds support for CentOS 8 Stream [1] to the centos-minimal
element. Users should set DIB_RELEASE=8-stream.
[1] https://www.centos.org/stream/
Change-Id: Id0825de735ab957c10daf35fb3c641f850cc6847
NetworkManager with simple-init has proven to be stable in OpenStack
infra, switch to it by default for CentOS and Fedora. For CentOS 8
and Fedora, add a check to make it the only option. Thus only CenOS 7
remains optionally using the legacy scripts; this is likely not used
anywhere (infra is really the primary user, where NetworkManager is
already used); we can likely remove this variable (and hence path) in
a future cleanup.
In the setup, remove rhel7 element which was never really tested.
Reorganise the fallthrough to call out the default paths as doing
nothing.
Change-Id: Ic996956da4b85f7d95179b8df9881d5f52c091af
This plumbs through an "--use-nm" flag to glean which instructs it to
setup interface bringup with NetworkManager rather than legacy network
enablement scripts.
In this case, install the NetworkManager package. In the non-nm case,
also install the network-scripts for Fedora 29 -- this has stopped
being installed by default (it's been deprecated since forever).
As noted in the docs, this is currently really only relevant on the
supported rpm distros which are using the ifcfg-rh NetworkManager
plugin to effectively re-use old config files. However,
NetworkManager has similar plugins for other platforms, so support can
be expanded if changes are proposed.
Depends-On: https://review.openstack.org/618964
Change-Id: I4d76e88ce25e5675fd5ef48924acd09915a62a4b
Currently we have all our elements and library files in a top-level
directory and install them into
<root>/share/diskimage-builder/[elements|lib] (where root is either /
or the root of a virtualenv).
The problem with this is that editable/development installs (pip -e)
do *not* install data_files. Thus we have no canonical location to
look for elements -- leading to the various odd things we do such as a
whole bunch of guessing at the top of disk-image-create and having a
special test-loader in tests/test_elements.py so we can run python
unit tests on those elements that have it.
data_files is really the wrong thing to use for what are essentially
assets of the program. data_files install works well for things like
config-files, init.d files or dropping documentation files.
By moving the elements under the diskimage_builder package, we always
know where they are relative to where we import from. In fact,
pkg_resources has an api for this which we wrap in the new
diskimage_builder/paths.py helper [1].
We use this helper to find the correct path in the couple of places we
need to find the base-elements dir, and for the paths to import the
library shell functions.
Elements such as svc-map and pkg-map include python unit-tests, which
we do not need tests/test_elements.py to special-case load any more.
They just get found automatically by the normal subunit loader.
I have a follow-on change (I69ca3d26fede0506a6353c077c69f735c8d84d28)
to move disk-image-create to a regular python entry-point.
Unfortunately, this has to move to work with setuptools. You'd think
a symlink under diskimage_builder/[elements|lib] would work, but it
doesn't.
[1] this API handles stuff like getting files out of .zip archive
modules, which we don't do. Essentially for us it's returning
__file__.
Change-Id: I5e3e3c97f385b1a4ff2031a161a55b231895df5b
