Commit graph

4 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Ian Wienand
4cb3346fec source-repositories : use explicit sudo/-C args when in REPO_DEST
The recent git ownership-checking changes (see related bug for full
details) mean we can not run git in non-owned directories.

We have a couple of cases here where we have done a "pushd" to work in
the REPO_DEST context; this is the destination directory that is
inside the chroot so needs to be operated on as "root" (via sudo
calls).  This certainly makes sense -- but given the new way of things
it can hide what context each call is working in, which is now very
important.  Previously this worked because you could read it; now it's
doing the UID check too, calls in here without sudo now fail.

Remvoe the pushd's and make every call that works in REPO_DEST
explicit with -C, and add sudo calls around it.

Change-Id: Id1f6bd94c9c77ef6ab2b562a7e0bc48f749c58ac
Related-Bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/devstack/+bug/1968798
2022-04-14 16:53:37 +00:00
Ian Wienand
ddb06b6657 source-repositories: don't use --git-dir
A recent(-ish) change in git [1] has exposed a bug in caching that
appears in one very specific circumstance -- updating the
openstack/openstack super-repo [2].

This repo gets a submodule update every time something is pushed.  By
using "--git-dir" while the cwd is one-level above the actual repo we
are confusing [1] which is not finding the submodule directories
correctly and giving us an error:

 Could not access submodule 'foo'

for every submodule that has updated between now and the last time we
updated the cache. [3]

The git manual does warn about this

 If you just want to run git as if it was started in <path> then use
 git -C <path>.

Indeed, that is what we want to do in this path.  Modify the calls to
use -C.

[1] 505a276596
[2] https://opendev.org/openstack/openstack/
[3] The result for opendev production is that image builds fail every
    time an openstack/* project is checked in; we then race to retry
    the build before another commit lands and updates the submodules
    again.

Change-Id: Iadb23454e29d8869e11407e1592007b0f0963e17
2021-11-16 19:16:03 +11:00
Dirk Mueller
421a0fa541 fail early when lates build information can not be fetched
When the mirror returns a error, it was trying to interpret the error
message (e.g. <html><title>Internal server error..) as a download link.
By using -f on curl we get an empty reply and an exit code, which, as
we run in set -e mode, aborts.

Change-Id: Ibaa39aedb7db286f859c4b090114c6a233b150c7
2019-05-31 16:09:25 +10:00
Ian Wienand
97c01e48ed Move elements & lib relative to diskimage_builder package
Currently we have all our elements and library files in a top-level
directory and install them into
<root>/share/diskimage-builder/[elements|lib] (where root is either /
or the root of a virtualenv).

The problem with this is that editable/development installs (pip -e)
do *not* install data_files.  Thus we have no canonical location to
look for elements -- leading to the various odd things we do such as a
whole bunch of guessing at the top of disk-image-create and having a
special test-loader in tests/test_elements.py so we can run python
unit tests on those elements that have it.

data_files is really the wrong thing to use for what are essentially
assets of the program.  data_files install works well for things like
config-files, init.d files or dropping documentation files.

By moving the elements under the diskimage_builder package, we always
know where they are relative to where we import from.  In fact,
pkg_resources has an api for this which we wrap in the new
diskimage_builder/paths.py helper [1].

We use this helper to find the correct path in the couple of places we
need to find the base-elements dir, and for the paths to import the
library shell functions.

Elements such as svc-map and pkg-map include python unit-tests, which
we do not need tests/test_elements.py to special-case load any more.
They just get found automatically by the normal subunit loader.

I have a follow-on change (I69ca3d26fede0506a6353c077c69f735c8d84d28)
to move disk-image-create to a regular python entry-point.

Unfortunately, this has to move to work with setuptools.  You'd think
a symlink under diskimage_builder/[elements|lib] would work, but it
doesn't.

[1] this API handles stuff like getting files out of .zip archive
modules, which we don't do.  Essentially for us it's returning
__file__.

Change-Id: I5e3e3c97f385b1a4ff2031a161a55b231895df5b
2016-11-01 17:27:41 -07:00