Patch allow to set path for local image source,
instead download latest or use the cached image.
This permit to build image also in environment without internet access.
re-propose of patch: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/diskimage-builder/+/809009
Change-Id: I54395b09af339caee040326b809e8fbf8b0e7d6a
This reverts commit 1f4fb1d7a5.
This unfortunately wasn't actually tested. Because the image-based
tests run sequentially, a prior failure in the centos-8 job meant the
ubuntu job never ran.
This is failing with
10-cache-ubuntu-tarball: line 28: DIB_LOCAL_IMAGE: unbound variable
There is also a seemingly unused variable DIB_IMAGE_LOCAL_FILE; I'm
not sure what this is doing.
For now revert, and it can be re-proposed with appropriate testing.
Change-Id: I0f3897c90dc863ee04c3295b9cb094f02d8658e3
Patch allow to set path for local image source,
instead download latest or use the cached image.
This permit to build image also in environment without internet access.
Change-Id: I9422e21c5d0445e31d5a7258aa7310b20e39b929
Patch allows to rebuild arbitrary images, which location, filename and
sha256sum are specified in variables, not only hardcoded $DIB_RELEASE/current.
Change-Id: I05418932a0c40d885fe00a49f1f49d7e86c67518
In a couple of places we use flock for critical sections, but we leave
lockfiles around in various locations which can be confusing.
Introduce DIB_LOCKFILES global (under ~/.cache/dib/lockfiles) and
write lockfiles in there.
Fix up removal of the lockfile in the yum path; we just want to make
sure we cleanup the .rpmmacros file, but we don't need to remove the
lockfile as well.
Co-Authored-By: Andreas Florath <andreas@florath.net>
Change-Id: Ie810b2836be521325afe923708d046112e1e1e20
Currently we have all our elements and library files in a top-level
directory and install them into
<root>/share/diskimage-builder/[elements|lib] (where root is either /
or the root of a virtualenv).
The problem with this is that editable/development installs (pip -e)
do *not* install data_files. Thus we have no canonical location to
look for elements -- leading to the various odd things we do such as a
whole bunch of guessing at the top of disk-image-create and having a
special test-loader in tests/test_elements.py so we can run python
unit tests on those elements that have it.
data_files is really the wrong thing to use for what are essentially
assets of the program. data_files install works well for things like
config-files, init.d files or dropping documentation files.
By moving the elements under the diskimage_builder package, we always
know where they are relative to where we import from. In fact,
pkg_resources has an api for this which we wrap in the new
diskimage_builder/paths.py helper [1].
We use this helper to find the correct path in the couple of places we
need to find the base-elements dir, and for the paths to import the
library shell functions.
Elements such as svc-map and pkg-map include python unit-tests, which
we do not need tests/test_elements.py to special-case load any more.
They just get found automatically by the normal subunit loader.
I have a follow-on change (I69ca3d26fede0506a6353c077c69f735c8d84d28)
to move disk-image-create to a regular python entry-point.
Unfortunately, this has to move to work with setuptools. You'd think
a symlink under diskimage_builder/[elements|lib] would work, but it
doesn't.
[1] this API handles stuff like getting files out of .zip archive
modules, which we don't do. Essentially for us it's returning
__file__.
Change-Id: I5e3e3c97f385b1a4ff2031a161a55b231895df5b
2016-11-01 17:27:41 -07:00
Renamed from elements/ubuntu/root.d/10-cache-ubuntu-tarball (Browse further)
