Commit Graph

6 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Carlos Goncalves
72442ba656 Auto find greatest Fedora cloud image sub-release
Fedora cloud images have sub-releases in their filename. It is not
exacly clear how this is generated but we do know how we can determine
the greatest programatically.

Change-Id: I7fc56897c681fe037db211c290edcdd23cdd5d5b
2021-05-10 09:14:17 +00:00
Pedro Alvarez
f034dd00d9 Fix Fedora aarch64 image location
It used to be considered a 'secondary architecture' but that
is not the case anymore.

Change-Id: I8e5e9cfa915c8a3c979ff9db26477c0542d271db
2019-04-09 15:50:55 +00:00
Paul Belanger
7173658df2 Add support for Fedora 28, remove EOL Fedora 26
This updates diskimage-builder to support current Fedora releases (27
and 28) and removes support for Fedora 26 which is EOL as of June
2018.

Change-Id: I602b22ed4d5397b39dc1eef67964f6fbdcd93060
Signed-off-by: Paul Belanger <pabelanger@redhat.com>
2018-10-18 19:43:12 +11:00
Mark Hamzy
cdb423eeb9 secondary architectures use different url
The Fedora-Cloud-Base*qcow2 images are stored on a different
server for secondary architectures.

Change-Id: I90d48ce4175fd251e8f5ab7a70190ad952256a94
2018-03-01 19:38:14 -06:00
Ian Wienand
7774260b76 Use latest Fedora .qcow URL
The URL we are using seems to have disappeared.  Update this to
download.fedoraproject.org.  The new URL requires a "subrelease" now,
add it, along with a note on where it comes from.

Change-Id: I761e425f8a658669d9b8a70ce4260cec263ea51a
2017-09-15 11:06:22 +10:00
Ian Wienand
97c01e48ed Move elements & lib relative to diskimage_builder package
Currently we have all our elements and library files in a top-level
directory and install them into
<root>/share/diskimage-builder/[elements|lib] (where root is either /
or the root of a virtualenv).

The problem with this is that editable/development installs (pip -e)
do *not* install data_files.  Thus we have no canonical location to
look for elements -- leading to the various odd things we do such as a
whole bunch of guessing at the top of disk-image-create and having a
special test-loader in tests/test_elements.py so we can run python
unit tests on those elements that have it.

data_files is really the wrong thing to use for what are essentially
assets of the program.  data_files install works well for things like
config-files, init.d files or dropping documentation files.

By moving the elements under the diskimage_builder package, we always
know where they are relative to where we import from.  In fact,
pkg_resources has an api for this which we wrap in the new
diskimage_builder/paths.py helper [1].

We use this helper to find the correct path in the couple of places we
need to find the base-elements dir, and for the paths to import the
library shell functions.

Elements such as svc-map and pkg-map include python unit-tests, which
we do not need tests/test_elements.py to special-case load any more.
They just get found automatically by the normal subunit loader.

I have a follow-on change (I69ca3d26fede0506a6353c077c69f735c8d84d28)
to move disk-image-create to a regular python entry-point.

Unfortunately, this has to move to work with setuptools.  You'd think
a symlink under diskimage_builder/[elements|lib] would work, but it
doesn't.

[1] this API handles stuff like getting files out of .zip archive
modules, which we don't do.  Essentially for us it's returning
__file__.

Change-Id: I5e3e3c97f385b1a4ff2031a161a55b231895df5b
2016-11-01 17:27:41 -07:00