Currently we have all our elements and library files in a top-level
directory and install them into
<root>/share/diskimage-builder/[elements|lib] (where root is either /
or the root of a virtualenv).
The problem with this is that editable/development installs (pip -e)
do *not* install data_files. Thus we have no canonical location to
look for elements -- leading to the various odd things we do such as a
whole bunch of guessing at the top of disk-image-create and having a
special test-loader in tests/test_elements.py so we can run python
unit tests on those elements that have it.
data_files is really the wrong thing to use for what are essentially
assets of the program. data_files install works well for things like
config-files, init.d files or dropping documentation files.
By moving the elements under the diskimage_builder package, we always
know where they are relative to where we import from. In fact,
pkg_resources has an api for this which we wrap in the new
diskimage_builder/paths.py helper [1].
We use this helper to find the correct path in the couple of places we
need to find the base-elements dir, and for the paths to import the
library shell functions.
Elements such as svc-map and pkg-map include python unit-tests, which
we do not need tests/test_elements.py to special-case load any more.
They just get found automatically by the normal subunit loader.
I have a follow-on change (I69ca3d26fede0506a6353c077c69f735c8d84d28)
to move disk-image-create to a regular python entry-point.
Unfortunately, this has to move to work with setuptools. You'd think
a symlink under diskimage_builder/[elements|lib] would work, but it
doesn't.
[1] this API handles stuff like getting files out of .zip archive
modules, which we don't do. Essentially for us it's returning
__file__.
Change-Id: I5e3e3c97f385b1a4ff2031a161a55b231895df5b
The previous commit removes dkms from the base element, which
means the centos elements should no longer have a dependency on
EPEL. Therefore, we should not hardcode the epel dependency. It
can still be included in image builds as desired by using the epel
element explicitly.
Co-Authored-By: Ben Nemec <bnemec@redhat.com>
Change-Id: Iceff0d5bedd9816adfd2990970e7c216b67b6bd0
I guess I hadn't tried centos-minimal without the puppet elements that
install this for us. But the "base" element wants dkms, which is only
in EPEL for centos. But it's a helpful convenience so is globally
useful.
Change-Id: Ia9af97efdbd855fb8202353196ad649093788cb8
Now that we have a generic yum-minimal element, just use it in centos
instead of rinse. Adding base as an element-provides of yum-minimal
because this element conflicts with the base element.
Co-Authored-By: Gregory Haynes <greg@greghaynes.net>
Change-Id: I15275d821781171c118f21aa0c0bca55f65a65b3
There are times when a much more stripped down base image is desired
over the distro cloud images. For instance, Infra would like some base
images that do not have cloud-init or really much of anything else. This
is easy to accomplish with debootstrap and rinse.
Change-Id: I44ff22457165afb048fdaea469210ae47d83dd3f
