Commit graph

3 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Ian Wienand
97c01e48ed Move elements & lib relative to diskimage_builder package
Currently we have all our elements and library files in a top-level
directory and install them into
<root>/share/diskimage-builder/[elements|lib] (where root is either /
or the root of a virtualenv).

The problem with this is that editable/development installs (pip -e)
do *not* install data_files.  Thus we have no canonical location to
look for elements -- leading to the various odd things we do such as a
whole bunch of guessing at the top of disk-image-create and having a
special test-loader in tests/test_elements.py so we can run python
unit tests on those elements that have it.

data_files is really the wrong thing to use for what are essentially
assets of the program.  data_files install works well for things like
config-files, init.d files or dropping documentation files.

By moving the elements under the diskimage_builder package, we always
know where they are relative to where we import from.  In fact,
pkg_resources has an api for this which we wrap in the new
diskimage_builder/paths.py helper [1].

We use this helper to find the correct path in the couple of places we
need to find the base-elements dir, and for the paths to import the
library shell functions.

Elements such as svc-map and pkg-map include python unit-tests, which
we do not need tests/test_elements.py to special-case load any more.
They just get found automatically by the normal subunit loader.

I have a follow-on change (I69ca3d26fede0506a6353c077c69f735c8d84d28)
to move disk-image-create to a regular python entry-point.

Unfortunately, this has to move to work with setuptools.  You'd think
a symlink under diskimage_builder/[elements|lib] would work, but it
doesn't.

[1] this API handles stuff like getting files out of .zip archive
modules, which we don't do.  Essentially for us it's returning
__file__.

Change-Id: I5e3e3c97f385b1a4ff2031a161a55b231895df5b
2016-11-01 17:27:41 -07:00
Ben Nemec
088f0eb7ac Move busybox binary-dep to ramdisk element
Busybox should be installed and managed from the ramdisk element,
since that is common to all elements that need busybox.  In
addition, we do not want busybox installed when building Dracut
ramdisks, so it can't be in the deploy-* elements.

Change-Id: I2656d20b466138f7f6dfcf558ba90c6909151d3c
2014-10-21 16:05:19 -05:00
Jon-Paul Sullivan
0f12d45a50 Use provides to note an element provides deploy
Use "deploy" to denote that an element provides the deploy
capability for a ramdisk for tripleo installation purposes.

This will be a 3-part change to enable renaming deploy to
deploy-baremetal so that the generic "deploy" capability can
be used for the provides file, as a dependant change will have to
be made in tripleo-incubator.

The tripleo-incubator change is
I1ff4bb98c99dfe87ccc4fb19767b93e27707d3a7 and that swaps to using
deploy-baremetal in place of deploy for ramdisk creation when using
baremetal.

Change-Id: Ibb4026e8fc8ba6378061461c4796a91ab2fa991f
2014-04-18 20:10:46 +01:00
Renamed from elements/deploy/binary-deps.d/deploy (Browse further)