Commit graph

5 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Bob Fournier
8cab82bf9d Use x86 architeture specific grub2 packages for RHEL
Similar to https://review.opendev.org/#/c/663693/, the x64 packages
should be used for x86 architectures.

Change-Id: I5e8a4d58e96d65eb60fc539b8a1d56853b12faac
Closes-Bug: 1843820
2019-09-12 15:06:17 -04:00
Lon Hohberger
0cf0942068 Use architecture-specific grub2 RPMs on RHEL8
RHEL8 ships a bunch of grub2-efi-X-modules in its main
repository, each of which provides grub2-efi-modules,
potentially causing nondeterminism when building images.

This changes the DIB elements to always use architecture-
specific RPMs when RHEL8 is selected.

Change-Id: If94f3721195d5ecd80036e4234a3ca223a19c349
Related: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1716672
2019-06-06 10:50:51 -04:00
Zhangfei Gao
a8635d3a3b Fix grub2 dependency on arm64
Unable to locate package reported when
DIB_RELEASE=jessie disk-image-create debian ironic-agent \
grub2 devuser -a arm64 -o deploy-jessie

E: Unable to locate package grub-pc-bin
E: Unable to locate package shim-signed
E: Unable to locate package grub-efi-amd64-signed

Fix the issue via adding arch dependency and arm64 packages

Change-Id: I40650a887b575a9c2b00a8c5036c35354d548673
Signed-off-by: Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@linaro.org>
2017-10-16 13:39:34 +08:00
Andreas Florath
003fc17208 Fix #1627402: fix grub2 element for ubuntu xenial
Looks that the special handling for Ubuntu is not needed any longer
(its a pity that there are no detailed comments...).

The grub2 element is a second implementation of the bootstrap element
- but because there are some features that come only here, e.g. efi
boot, it should be working as long as this is not implemented in the
bootloader element.

Change-Id: I74269116ea30b84f3259805720d5cd1616f960c5
Signed-off-by: Andreas Florath <andreas@florath.net>
Closes-Bug: #1627402
2017-02-11 18:44:18 +00:00
Ian Wienand
97c01e48ed Move elements & lib relative to diskimage_builder package
Currently we have all our elements and library files in a top-level
directory and install them into
<root>/share/diskimage-builder/[elements|lib] (where root is either /
or the root of a virtualenv).

The problem with this is that editable/development installs (pip -e)
do *not* install data_files.  Thus we have no canonical location to
look for elements -- leading to the various odd things we do such as a
whole bunch of guessing at the top of disk-image-create and having a
special test-loader in tests/test_elements.py so we can run python
unit tests on those elements that have it.

data_files is really the wrong thing to use for what are essentially
assets of the program.  data_files install works well for things like
config-files, init.d files or dropping documentation files.

By moving the elements under the diskimage_builder package, we always
know where they are relative to where we import from.  In fact,
pkg_resources has an api for this which we wrap in the new
diskimage_builder/paths.py helper [1].

We use this helper to find the correct path in the couple of places we
need to find the base-elements dir, and for the paths to import the
library shell functions.

Elements such as svc-map and pkg-map include python unit-tests, which
we do not need tests/test_elements.py to special-case load any more.
They just get found automatically by the normal subunit loader.

I have a follow-on change (I69ca3d26fede0506a6353c077c69f735c8d84d28)
to move disk-image-create to a regular python entry-point.

Unfortunately, this has to move to work with setuptools.  You'd think
a symlink under diskimage_builder/[elements|lib] would work, but it
doesn't.

[1] this API handles stuff like getting files out of .zip archive
modules, which we don't do.  Essentially for us it's returning
__file__.

Change-Id: I5e3e3c97f385b1a4ff2031a161a55b231895df5b
2016-11-01 17:27:41 -07:00
Renamed from elements/grub2/pkg-map (Browse further)