Commit Graph

9 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Yolanda Robla
e21935626b Refactor block-device base functions.
As part of the final steps, refactor the bits belonging
to block device and functions. This is a partial refactor
from I3600c6a3d663c697b59d91bd3fbb5e408af345e4

Change-Id: I7aa4fe0466e44846d8fa3194575d446fe4b5b2e6
Co-Authored-By: Andreas Florath <andreas@florath.net>
2017-05-04 19:54:18 +00:00
Jenkins
347833856e Merge "Ignore missing path in unmount_dir" 2017-04-07 15:59:47 +00:00
Corey O'Brien
aa90f7991a Ignore missing path in unmount_dir
If the path is missing, unmount_dir currently exits with an error which
unintentionally aborts cleanup efforts early. This change makes
unmount_dir idempotent by exiting successfully if a directory doesn't
exist.

Change-Id: I1491b4344e8569ecb2833f44baee445a89a39d61
2017-04-06 10:08:13 -04:00
Ian Wienand
6802cf7100 Run dib-run-parts out of /tmp
The dib-run-parts element was copying our internal version of
dib-run-parts into /usr/local/bin to be used running scripts inside
the target chroot.  However, it never cleaned up after itself.  This
means all images were left with an unmanaged local install of
dib-run-parts.

This copies dib-run-parts into the hooks directory of the chroot and
runs it from there.  It is cleaned up automatically on the exit path.

The dib-run-parts element is no longer required and it has been
removed from all dependencies.  It is left with a deprecation notice
in the README.  For compatability we convert it to simply install
dib-utils.

Codesearch shows no users depending on this unintentional implicit
install.  Note os-refresh-config depends on dib-utils and thus will
have an explicitly installed version.

Partial-Bug: #1673144
Change-Id: Ia2e96c00a4246c04beb96c17f83b8aefb69219ca
2017-04-05 13:11:22 +10:00
Ian Wienand
fd424757a6 Don't provide dib-run-parts
It was an oversight during v2 development for dib to start providing
dib-run-parts.  The intention was for dib to use a vendored
dib-run-parts directly from $_LIB and have no dependencies on
dib-utils at all.  By exporting dib-run-parts, we created an
unintentional conflict with the dib-utils package which provides the
same script.

Tools that depend on dib-utils are unaffected by this
(os-refresh-config).

The only tool that installs diskimage-builder and then assumes
dib-run-parts is available in the path is instack.  I have proposed
Ibfe972208df40fa092b11b5419043524c903f1b4 to modify that to use our
internal version.

Change-Id: I149c345d38d761a49b3a6ccc4833482f09f1cd05
2017-04-05 13:11:20 +10:00
Ian Wienand
3f8800832a Release 1.27.0
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
 iQEcBAABAgAGBQJYk8+9AAoJEBty/58O8cX8LdIH+wU/VrEVs0XYohiL6DUgabzs
 112U3UUihH5xMc/ca9Tarx+XwEvfMZkwYN2Qr0JoRJjmSt2AL6AezUhGSV+98vaY
 iQEccaFDFYlyDHm4V2r7N1xwS0B3mx87FPqVQQSUKlc3JsQxCy4o9RtD9aM8Gvqy
 +gAxMxL3p3O131K0Rvb0U5lC1FLgft9SuljCV8i5nU4/HdoryD6hedz2/ss8a9KG
 KKEdBKvPBKn73+nb8peQD/VXpej9C31r87q5VEjUsZkJ7gduY/qYLlGGgoBQqAXN
 WQ/ef1RkQKW5ba2jsjnk7fdOrA0+wYENxorR2WecuZbe2ieXw6fP3lYiD6VeWsM=
 =IUuh
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Merge tag '1.27.0' into merge-branch

Release 1.27.0

Change-Id: I9f6948636cae6d375d1d8315976504021f5a3bbb
2017-02-03 11:49:45 +11:00
Ian Wienand
adf39c52cf Release 1.21.1
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
 iQEcBAABAgAGBQJYW2GoAAoJEBty/58O8cX8uSAH/15dJsglP6Zie7jSSJcR6k+e
 PJembHn9qrqrCjmJ5EwakojySaaLhwEJKvlP54OU9v7pmUXL9gJtK2OzW54LQ41g
 xBHIu0Pg4z7juyHm9+1P2Sr7Mzs1pVSEbsIYpDYUU19eghI1EAeIj3I1woKgajN7
 JlI61j3r67G6EAVtPOnmD1jvXS8CrtjiJ9wtWTH20pWfmksovg/GuXUCZrLkAAhO
 NcK35CdMii1Hkr7XOH424La/Ar+3qfUX18ZkbJY6yHzkq/ityTzzKOFjAaDl2Jg9
 WNc+SLCVYpPhPwgt7miTywamUNj3ZviA5/Hd8fuLXmtHSLQ23WOtBiaQMLtwXHs=
 =8dIl
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Merge tag '1.26.1' into merge-branch

Release 1.21.1

Change-Id: Ib9eb3dd1d384fc5b6a9846608216e056c57a173a
2017-02-02 20:36:23 +11:00
Andreas Florath
ec7f56c1b2 Refactor: block-device handling (partitioning)
During the creation of a disk image (e.g. for a VM), there is the need
to create, setup, configure and afterwards detach some kind of storage
where the newly installed OS can be copied to or directly installed
in.

This patch implements partitioning handling.

Change-Id: I0ca6a4ae3a2684d473b44e5f332ee4225ee30f8c
Signed-off-by: Andreas Florath <andreas@florath.net>
2017-01-24 19:59:10 +00:00
Ian Wienand
97c01e48ed Move elements & lib relative to diskimage_builder package
Currently we have all our elements and library files in a top-level
directory and install them into
<root>/share/diskimage-builder/[elements|lib] (where root is either /
or the root of a virtualenv).

The problem with this is that editable/development installs (pip -e)
do *not* install data_files.  Thus we have no canonical location to
look for elements -- leading to the various odd things we do such as a
whole bunch of guessing at the top of disk-image-create and having a
special test-loader in tests/test_elements.py so we can run python
unit tests on those elements that have it.

data_files is really the wrong thing to use for what are essentially
assets of the program.  data_files install works well for things like
config-files, init.d files or dropping documentation files.

By moving the elements under the diskimage_builder package, we always
know where they are relative to where we import from.  In fact,
pkg_resources has an api for this which we wrap in the new
diskimage_builder/paths.py helper [1].

We use this helper to find the correct path in the couple of places we
need to find the base-elements dir, and for the paths to import the
library shell functions.

Elements such as svc-map and pkg-map include python unit-tests, which
we do not need tests/test_elements.py to special-case load any more.
They just get found automatically by the normal subunit loader.

I have a follow-on change (I69ca3d26fede0506a6353c077c69f735c8d84d28)
to move disk-image-create to a regular python entry-point.

Unfortunately, this has to move to work with setuptools.  You'd think
a symlink under diskimage_builder/[elements|lib] would work, but it
doesn't.

[1] this API handles stuff like getting files out of .zip archive
modules, which we don't do.  Essentially for us it's returning
__file__.

Change-Id: I5e3e3c97f385b1a4ff2031a161a55b231895df5b
2016-11-01 17:27:41 -07:00