The purpose of the openSUSE element is to build openSUSE distribution
based images, so an additional community repo shouldn't be pulled into
the image. In addition the dkms dependency is blacklisted for SUSE
in the dkms element anyway, so this should be a noop.
Change-Id: I0aa06d9f4f110546032f910e3361840693d02de7
Currently openSUSE 42.3 has entered feature freeze mode
so it is a good point in time to verify that 42.3 builds
are working successfully. Also test opensuse-minimal for
platforms that support it (need working zypper package)
Change-Id: I4c613e1e68cb7375c29d544bbf70b5da9bf21414
The dib-run-parts element was copying our internal version of
dib-run-parts into /usr/local/bin to be used running scripts inside
the target chroot. However, it never cleaned up after itself. This
means all images were left with an unmanaged local install of
dib-run-parts.
This copies dib-run-parts into the hooks directory of the chroot and
runs it from there. It is cleaned up automatically on the exit path.
The dib-run-parts element is no longer required and it has been
removed from all dependencies. It is left with a deprecation notice
in the README. For compatability we convert it to simply install
dib-utils.
Codesearch shows no users depending on this unintentional implicit
install. Note os-refresh-config depends on dib-utils and thus will
have an explicitly installed version.
Partial-Bug: #1673144
Change-Id: Ia2e96c00a4246c04beb96c17f83b8aefb69219ca
zypper on non-suse hosts is not parsing the pattern repodata because
those are marked as an inofficial extension to the repomd specification.
This is not a big issue as there is meanwhile in newer openSUSE
distributions a pattern *package* that depends on the same packages like
the pattern would do, so we can just replace it with that.
Change-Id: I0c8f713075bd7e5bf1d425f81933b4666654add7
Depends-On: I34e98f0f7693859ed05011b008334628adff612f
Signed-off-by: Paul Belanger <pabelanger@redhat.com>
Currently we have all our elements and library files in a top-level
directory and install them into
<root>/share/diskimage-builder/[elements|lib] (where root is either /
or the root of a virtualenv).
The problem with this is that editable/development installs (pip -e)
do *not* install data_files. Thus we have no canonical location to
look for elements -- leading to the various odd things we do such as a
whole bunch of guessing at the top of disk-image-create and having a
special test-loader in tests/test_elements.py so we can run python
unit tests on those elements that have it.
data_files is really the wrong thing to use for what are essentially
assets of the program. data_files install works well for things like
config-files, init.d files or dropping documentation files.
By moving the elements under the diskimage_builder package, we always
know where they are relative to where we import from. In fact,
pkg_resources has an api for this which we wrap in the new
diskimage_builder/paths.py helper [1].
We use this helper to find the correct path in the couple of places we
need to find the base-elements dir, and for the paths to import the
library shell functions.
Elements such as svc-map and pkg-map include python unit-tests, which
we do not need tests/test_elements.py to special-case load any more.
They just get found automatically by the normal subunit loader.
I have a follow-on change (I69ca3d26fede0506a6353c077c69f735c8d84d28)
to move disk-image-create to a regular python entry-point.
Unfortunately, this has to move to work with setuptools. You'd think
a symlink under diskimage_builder/[elements|lib] would work, but it
doesn't.
[1] this API handles stuff like getting files out of .zip archive
modules, which we don't do. Essentially for us it's returning
__file__.
Change-Id: I5e3e3c97f385b1a4ff2031a161a55b231895df5b
