Now that fedora-25 is released, bump fedora-minimal / fedora elements
to use it.
Change-Id: Ifdb05255e7a138b99099252fe17041fe4621b6f4
Depends-On: I3cc467a2d08486458b3f625f94ba969532f6cd04
Signed-off-by: Paul Belanger <pabelanger@redhat.com>
Every run we are doing a full tar.gz of the chroot environment that
never gets used.
It's not suitable for CI since we use fresh images each time there.
The cache in general isn't really isn't a very safe thing to have
around, because there's no invalidation procedure and no real way to
make one -- we've no guarantee that a new chroot build even moments
after a previous one wouldn't bring in or different packages, etc (of
course this is *unlikely*, but the longer you go between builds the
worse the problem becomes. Also, tons of packages get installed after
this not from any cache, so potential speed-up is rather marginal.
Debian turned this off with I58fc485aacacaa17243bf9ce760ed91256d1f182.
However, given the reasons above and it's complete lack of testing, I
don't see this as useful.
If we really want this type of thing, I think we should come up with a
way to use a persistent external yum/dnf cache that yum/dnf keeps in
sync with it's usual invalidation rules.
Change-Id: I66789c35db75c41bc45ea1ad2e26f87456de4e4d
When the kernel gets installed on Fedora, the rpm post scripts call
"/bin/kernel-install" [1] to install it. This is a script provided by
systemd.
However, in [2], Fedora ships a patch to kernel-install that makes a
call-out to /sbin/new-kernel-pkg -- the install script provided by
grubby [3]
Without grubby installed, systemd's kernel-install script goes off and
runs dracut plugins directly [4], which eventually creates the initrd.
For reasons that are not clearly explained, the initrd will end up in
a a "machine-id" sub-directory of /boot (possibly, so you can symlink
it?). It is also called "initrd", even though it's an initramfs, for
historical reasons in dracut I think.
It is at this point that I think 99-ramdisk has been written to move
the generated initrd file back into /boot. Later on, when we build
the image, we run grub-install and it picks up the kernel and the
initrd and installs everything.
grubby's new-kernel-pkg [6] it's very similar -- it uses dracut to
make the initramfs ... but in this case it is put in /boot and is
actually called initramfs.
The subtle change that led me down this path is that dracut has been
modified to have a "Recommends" for grubby for >F22 [7]. After
discussing this change with the author, it turns out it was *always*
intended to use the grubby-based kernel install scripts for Fedora --
our builds have been incorrect in not including the package. The
author got sick of people removing the package and making unbootable
systems, hence the change.
Thus this removes the workarounds in 99-ramdisk and replace it with an
install of the grubby package. grubby's kernel install script will
put the kernel & generated initramfs in /boot, and it will be
installed correctly via the usual grub install later when we build the
disk image.
I have built F22 & F23 fedora-minimal images with this and they boot.
[1] http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/kernel.git/tree/kernel.spec#n1832
[2] http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/systemd.git/tree/kernel-install-grubby.patch
[3] http://linux.die.net/man/8/new-kernel-pkg
[4] https://github.com/haraldh/dracut/blob/master/50-dracut.install
[5] 81516adcb7
[6] https://github.com/rhinstaller/grubby/blob/master/new-kernel-pkg
[7] 47ff68e78b
Change-Id: I1a6e45d04755515286b3d49f8280c16b527e2f48
Clarify what this script is doing. It currently fails on some
platforms due to earlier errors, see
Ibcce35da928f64e6a719b070bcc833346ee7ee92
Change-Id: Id4c04d7ae20068643df34d2fa31068e8a917a52d
The check suffered from various flaws.
First, due to missing quotes around $initrd, 'wc -l' would always see
1 line no matter how many results the find returned.
Second, echo adds a line break making 'wc -l' count 1 even for empty
string. We need to add a check for empty string.
Change-Id: Ib2c67960f566dbdc471d9585a4cef1beb1cc38ab
Closes-Bug: #1506692
Add basic F22/dnf support to yum-minimal path. We extract common
code, add some comments and reduce duplication.
Change-Id: If4bd5f88e26bd6f2168958f1ec1efff1072de7ba
The centos-minimal approach of using rinse does not, it turns out, work
on centos. That's a bummer. It's also rather heavyweight. Instead, with
minor machinations, we can just use yum itself pointed at a chroot.
Also adding fedora-minimal element which creates a fedora image using
the new yum-minimal approach.
Co-Authored-By: Gregory Haynes <greg@greghaynes.net>
Change-Id: I026fd9d323e786dae5bb67824c6501067e1ceaa3
