Two bugs are addressed.
1) The sysprep element was broken in that it only truncates
/etc/machine-id, but not /var/lib/dbus/machine-id. systemd will
not generate a new machine-id if /var/lib/dbus/machine-id is
present[1], it will simply copy it to /etc/machine-id.
We observed machine-ids being packaged in /var/lib/dbus/machine-id
on several distros: Ubuntu Bionic, Fedora 29, Debian Stretch.
CentOS 7 and Ubuntu Xenial do not contain packaged machine-id as
far as I can tell.
All test builds were performed using -minimal elements.
2) A second bug existed where debian-minimal did not run the sysprep
element at all, so a stretch image I tested contained a populated
/etc/machine-id AND a populated /var/lib/dbus/machine-id.
[1] https://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/machine-id.html#Initialization
Change-Id: Ibb28b6e90d966a845de38a2cd5a1e8babd2604bc
Currently there's more-or-less an assumption that a kernel is
installed, so module blacklists are simply echoed into the modprobe
blacklist. This may not be the case with some ongoing container work.
Although we don't need to blacklist modules for containers, it also
doesn't hurt. Move the debootstrap element to the new modprobe
element, and allow it to create the blacklist directory.
Change-Id: I0f057caf473951df56a2af9633e3a5b53e0809b1
The dib-run-parts element was copying our internal version of
dib-run-parts into /usr/local/bin to be used running scripts inside
the target chroot. However, it never cleaned up after itself. This
means all images were left with an unmanaged local install of
dib-run-parts.
This copies dib-run-parts into the hooks directory of the chroot and
runs it from there. It is cleaned up automatically on the exit path.
The dib-run-parts element is no longer required and it has been
removed from all dependencies. It is left with a deprecation notice
in the README. For compatability we convert it to simply install
dib-utils.
Codesearch shows no users depending on this unintentional implicit
install. Note os-refresh-config depends on dib-utils and thus will
have an explicitly installed version.
Partial-Bug: #1673144
Change-Id: Ia2e96c00a4246c04beb96c17f83b8aefb69219ca
Currently we have all our elements and library files in a top-level
directory and install them into
<root>/share/diskimage-builder/[elements|lib] (where root is either /
or the root of a virtualenv).
The problem with this is that editable/development installs (pip -e)
do *not* install data_files. Thus we have no canonical location to
look for elements -- leading to the various odd things we do such as a
whole bunch of guessing at the top of disk-image-create and having a
special test-loader in tests/test_elements.py so we can run python
unit tests on those elements that have it.
data_files is really the wrong thing to use for what are essentially
assets of the program. data_files install works well for things like
config-files, init.d files or dropping documentation files.
By moving the elements under the diskimage_builder package, we always
know where they are relative to where we import from. In fact,
pkg_resources has an api for this which we wrap in the new
diskimage_builder/paths.py helper [1].
We use this helper to find the correct path in the couple of places we
need to find the base-elements dir, and for the paths to import the
library shell functions.
Elements such as svc-map and pkg-map include python unit-tests, which
we do not need tests/test_elements.py to special-case load any more.
They just get found automatically by the normal subunit loader.
I have a follow-on change (I69ca3d26fede0506a6353c077c69f735c8d84d28)
to move disk-image-create to a regular python entry-point.
Unfortunately, this has to move to work with setuptools. You'd think
a symlink under diskimage_builder/[elements|lib] would work, but it
doesn't.
[1] this API handles stuff like getting files out of .zip archive
modules, which we don't do. Essentially for us it's returning
__file__.
Change-Id: I5e3e3c97f385b1a4ff2031a161a55b231895df5b
