Commit graph

2 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Ian Wienand
fd424757a6 Don't provide dib-run-parts
It was an oversight during v2 development for dib to start providing
dib-run-parts.  The intention was for dib to use a vendored
dib-run-parts directly from $_LIB and have no dependencies on
dib-utils at all.  By exporting dib-run-parts, we created an
unintentional conflict with the dib-utils package which provides the
same script.

Tools that depend on dib-utils are unaffected by this
(os-refresh-config).

The only tool that installs diskimage-builder and then assumes
dib-run-parts is available in the path is instack.  I have proposed
Ibfe972208df40fa092b11b5419043524c903f1b4 to modify that to use our
internal version.

Change-Id: I149c345d38d761a49b3a6ccc4833482f09f1cd05
2017-04-05 13:11:20 +10:00
Ian Wienand
d65678678e Move dib-run-parts into diskimage-builder
Move dib-run-parts from dib-utils into diskimage-builder directly.

For calling outside the chroot, we provide a standard entry-point
script.  However, as noted in the warning comment, the underlying
script is still copied directly into the chroot by the dib-run-parts
element.  I believe this to be the KISS approach.

This removes the dependency on dib-utils.  We have discussed this
previously and nobody seemed to think retiring dib-utils was going to
be an issue.

This also updates the documentation to not mention dib-utils, or using
disk-image-create via $PATH setup, but rather gives instructions on
installing from pip with a virtualenv.

Change-Id: Ic1e22ba498d2c368da7d72e2e2b70ff34324feb8
2016-11-04 17:07:37 +11:00