97c01e48ed
Currently we have all our elements and library files in a top-level directory and install them into <root>/share/diskimage-builder/[elements|lib] (where root is either / or the root of a virtualenv). The problem with this is that editable/development installs (pip -e) do *not* install data_files. Thus we have no canonical location to look for elements -- leading to the various odd things we do such as a whole bunch of guessing at the top of disk-image-create and having a special test-loader in tests/test_elements.py so we can run python unit tests on those elements that have it. data_files is really the wrong thing to use for what are essentially assets of the program. data_files install works well for things like config-files, init.d files or dropping documentation files. By moving the elements under the diskimage_builder package, we always know where they are relative to where we import from. In fact, pkg_resources has an api for this which we wrap in the new diskimage_builder/paths.py helper [1]. We use this helper to find the correct path in the couple of places we need to find the base-elements dir, and for the paths to import the library shell functions. Elements such as svc-map and pkg-map include python unit-tests, which we do not need tests/test_elements.py to special-case load any more. They just get found automatically by the normal subunit loader. I have a follow-on change (I69ca3d26fede0506a6353c077c69f735c8d84d28) to move disk-image-create to a regular python entry-point. Unfortunately, this has to move to work with setuptools. You'd think a symlink under diskimage_builder/[elements|lib] would work, but it doesn't. [1] this API handles stuff like getting files out of .zip archive modules, which we don't do. Essentially for us it's returning __file__. Change-Id: I5e3e3c97f385b1a4ff2031a161a55b231895df5b
52 lines
1.6 KiB
Bash
Executable file
52 lines
1.6 KiB
Bash
Executable file
#!/bin/bash
|
|
#
|
|
# Copyright 2014 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.
|
|
#
|
|
# Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); you may
|
|
# not use this file except in compliance with the License. You may obtain
|
|
# a copy of the License at
|
|
#
|
|
# http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
|
|
#
|
|
# Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
|
|
# distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT
|
|
# WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. See the
|
|
# License for the specific language governing permissions and limitations
|
|
# under the License.
|
|
|
|
if [ ${DIB_DEBUG_TRACE:-0} -gt 0 ]; then
|
|
set -x
|
|
fi
|
|
set -eu
|
|
set -o pipefail
|
|
|
|
# exit directly if DIB_DPKG_MANIFEST is not defined properly
|
|
if [ -z "${DIB_DPKG_MANIFEST:-}" ]; then
|
|
echo "DIB_DPKG_MANIFEST must be set to the location of a manifest file you wish to use"
|
|
exit 0
|
|
elif [ ! -f "$DIB_DPKG_MANIFEST" -o ! -s "$DIB_DPKG_MANIFEST" ]; then
|
|
echo "$DIB_DPKG_MANIFEST is not a valid manifest file."
|
|
echo "You should assign a proper manifest file in DIB_DPKG_MANIFEST"
|
|
exit 1
|
|
fi
|
|
|
|
DIB_DPKG_MANIFEST=$(readlink -f $DIB_DPKG_MANIFEST)
|
|
|
|
# Create the preferences file from the given manifest
|
|
outfile=$(mktemp)
|
|
for package in $(jq -r ".packages[].package" $DIB_DPKG_MANIFEST); do
|
|
version=$(jq -r ".packages[] | select(.package == \"${package}\") |\
|
|
.version" $DIB_DPKG_MANIFEST)
|
|
cat << EOF >> $outfile
|
|
Package: ${package}
|
|
Pin: version ${version}
|
|
Pin-Priority: 1001
|
|
|
|
EOF
|
|
done
|
|
|
|
if [ -s $outfile ]; then
|
|
sudo mv $outfile $TMP_MOUNT_PATH/etc/apt/preferences
|
|
else
|
|
rm $outfile
|
|
fi
|