5e2330d89c
mkfs's arguments are mkfs [options] [-t type] [fs-options] device [size] So it seems our MKFS_OPTS are really supposed to be fs-options, rather than options to mkfs itself. Why didn't we notice? It's quite a trap -- mkfs.ext2 has a "-t" option, so when we're calling $ mkfs -i 4096 ... -t ext4 ... We actually just fall-back to the default from the mkfs wrapper which is mkfs.ext2 which works! But when you make that, say, xfs, we're not calling the right wrapper at all. Also update documentation Closes-Bug: #1648287 Change-Id: I3ea5807088ab361bd9c235c07fb1553fbaf9178b |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| source | ||