diskimage-builder/diskimage_builder/elements/partitioning-sfdisk/block-device.d/10-partitioning-sfdisk
Ian Wienand 97c01e48ed Move elements & lib relative to diskimage_builder package
Currently we have all our elements and library files in a top-level
directory and install them into
<root>/share/diskimage-builder/[elements|lib] (where root is either /
or the root of a virtualenv).

The problem with this is that editable/development installs (pip -e)
do *not* install data_files.  Thus we have no canonical location to
look for elements -- leading to the various odd things we do such as a
whole bunch of guessing at the top of disk-image-create and having a
special test-loader in tests/test_elements.py so we can run python
unit tests on those elements that have it.

data_files is really the wrong thing to use for what are essentially
assets of the program.  data_files install works well for things like
config-files, init.d files or dropping documentation files.

By moving the elements under the diskimage_builder package, we always
know where they are relative to where we import from.  In fact,
pkg_resources has an api for this which we wrap in the new
diskimage_builder/paths.py helper [1].

We use this helper to find the correct path in the couple of places we
need to find the base-elements dir, and for the paths to import the
library shell functions.

Elements such as svc-map and pkg-map include python unit-tests, which
we do not need tests/test_elements.py to special-case load any more.
They just get found automatically by the normal subunit loader.

I have a follow-on change (I69ca3d26fede0506a6353c077c69f735c8d84d28)
to move disk-image-create to a regular python entry-point.

Unfortunately, this has to move to work with setuptools.  You'd think
a symlink under diskimage_builder/[elements|lib] would work, but it
doesn't.

[1] this API handles stuff like getting files out of .zip archive
modules, which we don't do.  Essentially for us it's returning
__file__.

Change-Id: I5e3e3c97f385b1a4ff2031a161a55b231895df5b
2016-11-01 17:27:41 -07:00

47 lines
1.2 KiB
Bash
Executable File

#!/bin/bash
# dib-lint: disable=safe_sudo
if [ ${DIB_DEBUG_TRACE:-0} -gt 0 ]; then
set -x
fi
set -eu
set -o pipefail
# sanity checks
[ -n "$IMAGE_BLOCK_DEVICE" ] || die "Image block device not set"
# execute sfdisk with the given partitioning schema
sudo sfdisk -uS --force $IMAGE_BLOCK_DEVICE <<EOF
$DIB_PARTITIONING_SFDISK_SCHEMA
EOF
sudo partprobe $IMAGE_BLOCK_DEVICE
# To ensure no race conditions exist from calling partprobe
sudo udevadm settle
# If the partition isn't under /dev/loop*p1, create it with kpartx
DM=
if [ ! -e "${IMAGE_BLOCK_DEVICE}p1" ]; then
DM=${IMAGE_BLOCK_DEVICE/#\/dev/\/dev\/mapper}
# If running inside Docker, make our nodes manually, because udev will not be working.
if [ -f /.dockerenv ]; then
# kpartx cannot run in sync mode in docker.
sudo kpartx -av $TMP_IMAGE_PATH
sudo dmsetup --noudevsync mknodes
else
sudo kpartx -asv $TMP_IMAGE_PATH
fi
elif [[ "$ARCH" =~ "ppc" ]]; then
sudo kpartx -asv $TMP_IMAGE_PATH
fi
if [ -n "$DM" ]; then
echo "IMAGE_BLOCK_DEVICE=${DM}p1"
elif [[ "$ARCH" =~ "ppc" ]]; then
DM=${IMAGE_BLOCK_DEVICE/#\/dev/\/dev\/mapper}
echo "IMAGE_BLOCK_DEVICE=${DM}p2"
else
echo "IMAGE_BLOCK_DEVICE=${IMAGE_BLOCK_DEVICE}p1"
fi