generated from sig_core/wiki-template
Merge pull request 'add meeting minutes for 2024-03-07' (#26) from meeting/2024-03-07 into main
All checks were successful
mkdocs build / build (push) Successful in 1m12s
All checks were successful
mkdocs build / build (push) Successful in 1m12s
Reviewed-on: #26
This commit is contained in:
commit
0815462440
66
docs/events/meeting-notes/2024-03-07.md
Normal file
66
docs/events/meeting-notes/2024-03-07.md
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
|
||||
# SIG/HPC Meeting 2024-03-07
|
||||
|
||||
## Attendees
|
||||
|
||||
* Forrest Burt
|
||||
* Brian Phan
|
||||
* Sherif Nagy
|
||||
* Enrico Billi
|
||||
* Neil Hanlon
|
||||
* Jeremy Siadal
|
||||
* Chris Stackpole
|
||||
|
||||
## Old Business
|
||||
|
||||
* Intel Driver -
|
||||
* Sherif is working on this, has a prototype, needs DKMS
|
||||
* Used `make spec` script in the branch to create spec, and import from there
|
||||
* We think that upstream should adopt a different format/packaging methodology
|
||||
* Perhaps [packit](https://packit.dev) could be helpful?
|
||||
* What branch/version to use?
|
||||
* rhel-specific branches say not to use them; use the 'backports' branches instead
|
||||
* sherif appears to be in the right place
|
||||
* Next steps:
|
||||
* Neil to bring dkms from epel into projects
|
||||
* Sherif to upload to public location for review and testing
|
||||
* Jeremy to work on testing with some latest hardware
|
||||
* AI SIG
|
||||
* where will userspace tools live? HPC? AI? Both?
|
||||
* Neil: it should be reasonable for us to have the ability to easily release a package in multiple SIGs
|
||||
* NVidia GPU driver Testing -
|
||||
* Did not get time to review [Chris's work](https://github.com/mghpcsim/gpu-testing/tree/master) - will try to review this cycle
|
||||
* Kernel Cnode / MoS
|
||||
* re-actioning - Jeremy to work on once he has some time
|
||||
|
||||
## New Business
|
||||
|
||||
* Testing Warewulf - Brian
|
||||
* Current plan: put the tests upstream into Warewulf repo, Testing team can pull from / engage with upstream
|
||||
* What precisely are we going to test?
|
||||
* Functional/E2E tests -- provision a small cluster, etc (see last week's [discussions](https://sig-hpc.rocky.page/events/meeting-notes/2024-02-22/#discussions))
|
||||
* Future work can include e.g. slurm
|
||||
* Chris to check on status of slurm
|
||||
* Packages to bring in
|
||||
* [List](https://sig-hpc.rocky.page/packages/) on the wiki; needs updating (along with the rest of the wiki)
|
||||
* if anyone wants to bring something in, has questions, etc. Please ask/get in touch!
|
||||
* Neil to update the wiki
|
||||
|
||||
## Open Floor
|
||||
|
||||
* Vulnerability in [lustre](http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-announce-lustre.org/2024/000270.html) - related to user namespaces
|
||||
* Sherif was working on lustre-server, but it's a beast
|
||||
* DDN already builds RPMS, but... is it worth it to rebuild vs just use upstream?
|
||||
* Sherif: thinks it makes sense to rebuild against our specific user/kernel space
|
||||
* there are lustre-server for 8, but not 9, it appears.. why?
|
||||
* documentation supports this but again.. why?
|
||||
* Sherif to look into why lustre-server exists for 8 but not 9
|
||||
* Next meeting in two weeks on Thursday, March 1
|
||||
|
||||
## Action Items
|
||||
|
||||
* [ ] Chris to check on status of slurm
|
||||
* [ ] Neil to update the wiki
|
||||
* [ ] Sherif to look into why lustre-server exists for 8 but not 9
|
||||
* [ ] Neil to bring dkms from epel into projects
|
||||
* [ ] Sherif to upload to public location for review and testing
|
||||
* [ ] Jeremy to work on testing with some latest hardware
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user