Merge pull request 'init-pages' (#8) from init-pages into main

Reviewed-on: #8

docs/events/meeting-notes/2023-05-04.md

@@ -29,17 +29,25 @@
 ## Discussions:
 
 Greg: suggesting to have our own slurm, apptainer, singulatory, Warewulf
+
 Greg: We can reach to DDN about anything related to Luster
+
 Sherif: Suggesting to start building packages
+
 Nick: To build the community we need to start looking into documentation and forums
+
 Stack: we need to be careful and have strong justification for rebuilding stuff that exists in Epel
+
 Greg: asked how HPC centre prefer to manage / or already managing their slurm setup
+
 Few members mentioned one of the following two methods:
     * Keep upgrading on minor version of slurm
     * Keep upgrading on minor version of slurm then a major upgrade in a scheduled maintains window
 
 Greg and Nick: adding major-minor version in package name something like python2/3
+
 Sherif: Asking about Testing methodology with testing team
+
 Stack: They hope at some point they are able to test all sigs and working on getting OpenQA build for this
 
 ## Action items:

docs/events/meeting-notes/2023-05-18.md

@@ -12,15 +12,24 @@
 
 ## Discussions:
 Chris: Are we willing to support all openHPC stack or just the modules and how we imagine achieving this?
+
 Jeremy: Clear a bit of distro related stuff from openHPC would be great such as automake / autoconf
+
 Stack: We need to have a base line so people can start use rocky on HPC and make Rocky accessible
+
 Chris: A Demo / technical talk in 4 weeks
+
 Chris: Are we going to focus on 8 and 9?
+
 Stack and Chris, would be great if we can focus on 9
+
 Sherif: I hope we can do both but with 9 in the spotlight "this needs to be a SIG decision"
+
 Stack: Question, if we start moving openHPC within HPC sig are they going support more distros, we don't want to break packages for other EL distros
+
 Chris: so far testing on Rocky as the only supported EL distro
 
+
 ## Action items:
     * Get a demo / technical talk after 4 weeks "Sherif can arrange that with Chris"
     * Getting a list of packages that openHPC would like to move to distros "Jeremy will be point of contact if we need those in couple of weeks"

docs/events/meeting-notes/2023-06-01.md

@@ -9,15 +9,25 @@
 
 ## Discussions:
 Getting toolchains outside of openHPC such as automake
+
 Greg: We need to talk if we need to have a generic SIG for toolchains
+
 Greg: We need to look into adding more release packages such as intel compiler
+
 Brain storm ideas about optimizing binaries
+
 David: What would be the interest of having a light weight kernel for HPC
+
 Jeremy: mentioning intel light weight kernel https://github.com/intel/mos
+
 Chris: asking if there is any benchmark, hard numbers between shipped kernel and light weight kernel, so far, nothing solid
+
 Sherif: Slurm now is build but not in standard path and we agreed we are going to move standard path 
+
 Greg: make sure you have the provide type
+
 Chris: also make sure that downgrade works
+
 Greg and Chris, we can also contribute to openHPC documentation
 
 ## Action items:

docs/events/meeting-notes/2023-06-15.md

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-# SIG/HPC meeting 2023-06-01
+# SIG/HPC meeting 2023-06-15
 
 ## Attendees:
     * Chris Simmons
@@ -13,12 +13,19 @@
 ## Discussions:
 
 Chris gave a quick demo about openHPC / presentation 
+
 Jeremy sent the packages
+
 Greg: asked how the SIG's slurm is compatible with openHPC
+
 Sherif needs to look at openHPC slurm packages
+
 Chris we need to look on how to build easybuild and look into how to improve it
+
 Chris and Greg talking about if there is any standard that explains how to build systems compatible with each others, openHPC does follow best practices from different entities
+
 Chris provided https://github.com/holgerBerger/hpc-workspace which now a part of openHPC
+
 Sherif mentioned, forums category is now in place https://forums.rockylinux.org/c/sig/hpc/61
 
 ## Action items: