diff --git a/docs/contact.md b/docs/contact.md index 055fda5..7adb5be 100644 --- a/docs/contact.md +++ b/docs/contact.md @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ # Contact US -We hang out in our [SIG/HPC Mattermost channel](https://chat.rockylinux.org/rocky-linux/channels/sig-hpc) and #rockylinux-sig-hpc on irc.libera.chat "bridged to our MatterMost channel" +We hang out in our [SIG/HPC Mattermost channel](https://chat.rockylinux.org/rocky-linux/channels/sig-hpc) and #rockylinux-sig-hpc on irc.libera.chat "bridged to our MatterMost channel" also our [SIG forums are located here](https://forums.rockylinux.org/c/sig/hpc/61) diff --git a/docs/events.md b/docs/events.md index 6d7bb92..32fe82d 100644 --- a/docs/events.md +++ b/docs/events.md @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@ -## SIG/HPC Meeting +# SIG/HPC Meeting We are meeting twice a month on bi-weekly bases on Thursday at 9:00 PM UTC here on [Google meet](https://meet.google.com/hsy-qnoe-dxx) - for now - diff --git a/docs/events/meeting-notes/2023-05-18.md b/docs/events/meeting-notes/2023-05-18.md index a023c2f..eb5b06d 100644 --- a/docs/events/meeting-notes/2023-05-18.md +++ b/docs/events/meeting-notes/2023-05-18.md @@ -11,15 +11,15 @@ * Sherif ## Discussions: - Chris: Are we willing to support all openHPC stack or just the modules and how we imagine achieving this? - Jeremy: Clear a bit of distro related stuff from openHPC would be great such as automake / autoconf - Stack: We need to have a base line so people can start use rocky on HPC and make Rocky accessible - Chris: A Demo / technical talk in 4 weeks - Chris: Are we going to focus on 8 and 9? - Stack and Chris, would be great if we can focus on 9 - Sherif: I hope we can do both but with 9 in the spotlight "this needs to be a SIG decision" - Stack: Question, if we start moving openHPC within HPC sig are they going support more distros, we don't want to break packages for other EL distros - Chris: so far testing on Rocky as the only supported EL distro +Chris: Are we willing to support all openHPC stack or just the modules and how we imagine achieving this? +Jeremy: Clear a bit of distro related stuff from openHPC would be great such as automake / autoconf +Stack: We need to have a base line so people can start use rocky on HPC and make Rocky accessible +Chris: A Demo / technical talk in 4 weeks +Chris: Are we going to focus on 8 and 9? +Stack and Chris, would be great if we can focus on 9 +Sherif: I hope we can do both but with 9 in the spotlight "this needs to be a SIG decision" +Stack: Question, if we start moving openHPC within HPC sig are they going support more distros, we don't want to break packages for other EL distros +Chris: so far testing on Rocky as the only supported EL distro ## Action items: * Get a demo / technical talk after 4 weeks "Sherif can arrange that with Chris" diff --git a/docs/events/meeting-notes/2023-06-01.md b/docs/events/meeting-notes/2023-06-01.md index 28c65cb..6bd2747 100644 --- a/docs/events/meeting-notes/2023-06-01.md +++ b/docs/events/meeting-notes/2023-06-01.md @@ -8,17 +8,17 @@ * Chris Simmons ## Discussions: - Getting toolchains outside of openHPC such as automake - Greg: We need to talk if we need to have a generic SIG for toolchains - Greg: We need to look into adding more release packages such as intel compiler - Brain storm ideas about optimizing binaries - David: What would be the interest of having a light weight kernel for HPC - Jeremy: mentioning intel light weight kernel https://github.com/intel/mos - Chris: asking if there is any benchmark, hard numbers between shipped kernel and light weight kernel, so far, nothing solid - Sherif: Slurm now is build but not in standard path and we agreed we are going to move standard path - Greg: make sure you have the provide type - Chris: also make sure that downgrade works - Greg and Chris, we can also contribute to openHPC documentation +Getting toolchains outside of openHPC such as automake +Greg: We need to talk if we need to have a generic SIG for toolchains +Greg: We need to look into adding more release packages such as intel compiler +Brain storm ideas about optimizing binaries +David: What would be the interest of having a light weight kernel for HPC +Jeremy: mentioning intel light weight kernel https://github.com/intel/mos +Chris: asking if there is any benchmark, hard numbers between shipped kernel and light weight kernel, so far, nothing solid +Sherif: Slurm now is build but not in standard path and we agreed we are going to move standard path +Greg: make sure you have the provide type +Chris: also make sure that downgrade works +Greg and Chris, we can also contribute to openHPC documentation ## Action items: * Get a list of packages from Jeremy to pick up from openHPC diff --git a/docs/events/meeting-notes/2023-06-15.md b/docs/events/meeting-notes/2023-06-15.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..8179e01 --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/events/meeting-notes/2023-06-15.md @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@ +# SIG/HPC meeting 2023-06-01 + +## Attendees: + * Chris Simmons + * Nick Eggleston + * Forrest Burt + * Stack + * David DeBonis + * Jeremy Siadal + * Greg Kurtzer + * Sherif + +## Discussions: + +Chris gave a quick demo about openHPC / presentation +Jeremy sent the packages +Greg: asked how the SIG's slurm is compatible with openHPC +Sherif needs to look at openHPC slurm packages +Chris we need to look on how to build easybuild and look into how to improve it +Chris and Greg talking about if there is any standard that explains how to build systems compatible with each others, openHPC does follow best practices from different entities +Chris provided https://github.com/holgerBerger/hpc-workspace which now a part of openHPC +Sherif mentioned, forums category is now in place https://forums.rockylinux.org/c/sig/hpc/61 + +## Action items: + * Sherif to look int openHPC slurm spec file + * We need to get lists of centres and HPC that are moving to Rocky to make a blog post and PR + +## Old business: + +## 2023-06-01: + + * Get a list of packages from Jeremy to pick up from openHPC - Done + * Greg / Sherif talk in Rocky / RESF about generic SIG for common packages such as chaintools + * Plan the openHPC demo Chris / Sherif - Done + * Finlise the slurm package with naming / configuration - Done + +## 2023-05-18: + * Get a demo / technical talk after 4 weeks "Sherif can arrange that with Chris" - Done + * Getting a list of packages that openHPC would like to move to distros "Jeremy will be point of contact if we need those in couple of weeks" - Done + +## 2023-05-04 + * Start building slurm - On going, a bit slowing down with R9.2 and R8.8 releases, however packages are built, some minor configurations needs to be fixed - + * Start building apptainer - on hold - + * Start building singulartiry - on hold - + * Start building warewulf - on hold - + * Sherif: check about forums - done, we can have our own section if we want, can be discussed over the chat - + +## 2023-04-20 + * Reach out to other communities “Greg” - on going - + * Reaching out for different sites that uses Rocky for HPC “Stack will ping few of them and others as well -Group effort-” + * Reaching out to hardware vendors - nothing done yet - + * Statistic / public registry for sites / HPC to add themselves if they want - nothing done yet - diff --git a/docs/packages.md b/docs/packages.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..17dc104 --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/packages.md @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@ +# SIG/HPC Packages + +Those are some of the packages that we are thinking to maintain and support within this SIG + + * Lustre server and client + * Slurm + * Apptainer + * Easybuild + * Spack + * opempi build slurm support + * Lmod + * conda + * sstack + * fail2ban - in EPEL not sure if it's fit in this SIG - + * glusterfs-server - Better suited under SIG/Storage - + * glusterfs-selinux - Better suited under SIG/Storage - + * Cython + * genders + * pdsh + * gcc (latest releases, parallel install) + * autotools + * cmake + * hwloc (this really needs to support parallel versions) + * libtool + * valgrind (maybe) + * charliecloud + * Warewulf (if all config options are runtime instead of pre-compiled) + * magpie + * openpbs + * pmix +