testing/os-autoinst-distri-rocky
11
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/rocky-linux/os-autoinst-distri-rocky.git synced 2024-12-22 18:58:30 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
9f72e8e0dc
os-autoinst-distri-rocky/templates-updates

954 lines
44 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

Add support for testing updates Summary: This adds an entirely new workflow for testing distribution updates. The `ADVISORY` variable is introduced: when set, `main.pm` will load an early post-install test that sets up a repository containing the packages from the specified update, runs `dnf -y update`, and reboots. A new templates file is added, `templates-updates`, which adds two new flavors called `updates-server` and `updates-workstation`, each containing job templates for appropriate post-install tests. Scheduler is expected to post `ADVISORY=(update ID) HDD_1=(base image) FLAVOR=updates-(server|workstation)`, where (base image) is one of the stable release base disk images produced by `createhdds` and usually used for upgrade testing. This will result in the appropriate job templates being loaded. We rejig postinstall test loading and static network config a bit so that this works for both the 'compose' and 'updates' test flows: we have to ensure we bring up networking for the tap tests before we try and install the updates, but still allow later adjustment of the configuration. We take advantage of the openQA feature that was added a few months back to run the same module multiple times, so the `_advisory_update` module can reboot after installing the updates and the modules that take care of bootloader, encryption and login get run again. This looks slightly wacky in the web UI, though - it doesn't show the later runs of each module. We also use the recently added feature to specify `+HDD_1` in the test suites which use a disk image uploaded by an earlier post-install test, so the test suite value will take priority over the value POSTed by the scheduler for those tests, and we will use the uploaded disk image (and not the clean base image POSTed by the scheduler) for those tests. My intent here is to enhance the scheduler, adding a consumer which listens out for critpath updates, and runs this test flow for each one, then reports the results to ResultsDB where Bodhi could query and display them. We could also add a list of other packages to have one or both sets of update tests run on it, I guess. Test Plan: Try a post something like: HDD_1=disk_f25_server_3_x86_64.img DISTRI=fedora VERSION=25 FLAVOR=updates-server ARCH=x86_64 BUILD=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c ADVISORY=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c CURRREL=25 PREVREL=24 Pick an appropriate `ADVISORY` (ideally, one containing some packages which might actually be involved in the tests), and matching `FLAVOR` and `HDD_1`. The appropriate tests should run, a repo with the update packages should be created and enabled (and dnf update run), and the tests should work properly. Also test a regular compose run to make sure I didn't break anything. Reviewers: jskladan, jsedlak Reviewed By: jsedlak Subscribers: tflink Differential Revision: https://phab.qa.fedoraproject.org/D1143
2017-01-25 16:16:12 +00:00
#!/usr/share/openqa/script/load_templates
#
# Fedora Machines, Products, TestSuites and JobTemplates
#
# use load_templates to load the file into the database
#
{
JobTemplates => [
{
Move update tests into a separate job group This makes them more visible in the web UI.
2017-03-02 05:10:41 +00:00
group_name => "Fedora Updates",
Add support for testing updates Summary: This adds an entirely new workflow for testing distribution updates. The `ADVISORY` variable is introduced: when set, `main.pm` will load an early post-install test that sets up a repository containing the packages from the specified update, runs `dnf -y update`, and reboots. A new templates file is added, `templates-updates`, which adds two new flavors called `updates-server` and `updates-workstation`, each containing job templates for appropriate post-install tests. Scheduler is expected to post `ADVISORY=(update ID) HDD_1=(base image) FLAVOR=updates-(server|workstation)`, where (base image) is one of the stable release base disk images produced by `createhdds` and usually used for upgrade testing. This will result in the appropriate job templates being loaded. We rejig postinstall test loading and static network config a bit so that this works for both the 'compose' and 'updates' test flows: we have to ensure we bring up networking for the tap tests before we try and install the updates, but still allow later adjustment of the configuration. We take advantage of the openQA feature that was added a few months back to run the same module multiple times, so the `_advisory_update` module can reboot after installing the updates and the modules that take care of bootloader, encryption and login get run again. This looks slightly wacky in the web UI, though - it doesn't show the later runs of each module. We also use the recently added feature to specify `+HDD_1` in the test suites which use a disk image uploaded by an earlier post-install test, so the test suite value will take priority over the value POSTed by the scheduler for those tests, and we will use the uploaded disk image (and not the clean base image POSTed by the scheduler) for those tests. My intent here is to enhance the scheduler, adding a consumer which listens out for critpath updates, and runs this test flow for each one, then reports the results to ResultsDB where Bodhi could query and display them. We could also add a list of other packages to have one or both sets of update tests run on it, I guess. Test Plan: Try a post something like: HDD_1=disk_f25_server_3_x86_64.img DISTRI=fedora VERSION=25 FLAVOR=updates-server ARCH=x86_64 BUILD=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c ADVISORY=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c CURRREL=25 PREVREL=24 Pick an appropriate `ADVISORY` (ideally, one containing some packages which might actually be involved in the tests), and matching `FLAVOR` and `HDD_1`. The appropriate tests should run, a repo with the update packages should be created and enabled (and dnf update run), and the tests should work properly. Also test a regular compose run to make sure I didn't break anything. Reviewers: jskladan, jsedlak Reviewed By: jsedlak Subscribers: tflink Differential Revision: https://phab.qa.fedoraproject.org/D1143
2017-01-25 16:16:12 +00:00
machine => { name => "64bit" },
prio => 40,
product => {
arch => "x86_64",
distri => "fedora",
flavor => "updates-workstation",
version => "*",
},
test_suite => { name => "base_selinux" },
},
{
Move update tests into a separate job group This makes them more visible in the web UI.
2017-03-02 05:10:41 +00:00
group_name => "Fedora Updates",
Add support for testing updates Summary: This adds an entirely new workflow for testing distribution updates. The `ADVISORY` variable is introduced: when set, `main.pm` will load an early post-install test that sets up a repository containing the packages from the specified update, runs `dnf -y update`, and reboots. A new templates file is added, `templates-updates`, which adds two new flavors called `updates-server` and `updates-workstation`, each containing job templates for appropriate post-install tests. Scheduler is expected to post `ADVISORY=(update ID) HDD_1=(base image) FLAVOR=updates-(server|workstation)`, where (base image) is one of the stable release base disk images produced by `createhdds` and usually used for upgrade testing. This will result in the appropriate job templates being loaded. We rejig postinstall test loading and static network config a bit so that this works for both the 'compose' and 'updates' test flows: we have to ensure we bring up networking for the tap tests before we try and install the updates, but still allow later adjustment of the configuration. We take advantage of the openQA feature that was added a few months back to run the same module multiple times, so the `_advisory_update` module can reboot after installing the updates and the modules that take care of bootloader, encryption and login get run again. This looks slightly wacky in the web UI, though - it doesn't show the later runs of each module. We also use the recently added feature to specify `+HDD_1` in the test suites which use a disk image uploaded by an earlier post-install test, so the test suite value will take priority over the value POSTed by the scheduler for those tests, and we will use the uploaded disk image (and not the clean base image POSTed by the scheduler) for those tests. My intent here is to enhance the scheduler, adding a consumer which listens out for critpath updates, and runs this test flow for each one, then reports the results to ResultsDB where Bodhi could query and display them. We could also add a list of other packages to have one or both sets of update tests run on it, I guess. Test Plan: Try a post something like: HDD_1=disk_f25_server_3_x86_64.img DISTRI=fedora VERSION=25 FLAVOR=updates-server ARCH=x86_64 BUILD=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c ADVISORY=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c CURRREL=25 PREVREL=24 Pick an appropriate `ADVISORY` (ideally, one containing some packages which might actually be involved in the tests), and matching `FLAVOR` and `HDD_1`. The appropriate tests should run, a repo with the update packages should be created and enabled (and dnf update run), and the tests should work properly. Also test a regular compose run to make sure I didn't break anything. Reviewers: jskladan, jsedlak Reviewed By: jsedlak Subscribers: tflink Differential Revision: https://phab.qa.fedoraproject.org/D1143
2017-01-25 16:16:12 +00:00
machine => { name => "64bit" },
prio => 40,
product => {
arch => "x86_64",
distri => "fedora",
flavor => "updates-server",
version => "*",
},
test_suite => { name => "base_selinux" },
},
{
Move update tests into a separate job group This makes them more visible in the web UI.
2017-03-02 05:10:41 +00:00
group_name => "Fedora Updates",
Add support for testing updates Summary: This adds an entirely new workflow for testing distribution updates. The `ADVISORY` variable is introduced: when set, `main.pm` will load an early post-install test that sets up a repository containing the packages from the specified update, runs `dnf -y update`, and reboots. A new templates file is added, `templates-updates`, which adds two new flavors called `updates-server` and `updates-workstation`, each containing job templates for appropriate post-install tests. Scheduler is expected to post `ADVISORY=(update ID) HDD_1=(base image) FLAVOR=updates-(server|workstation)`, where (base image) is one of the stable release base disk images produced by `createhdds` and usually used for upgrade testing. This will result in the appropriate job templates being loaded. We rejig postinstall test loading and static network config a bit so that this works for both the 'compose' and 'updates' test flows: we have to ensure we bring up networking for the tap tests before we try and install the updates, but still allow later adjustment of the configuration. We take advantage of the openQA feature that was added a few months back to run the same module multiple times, so the `_advisory_update` module can reboot after installing the updates and the modules that take care of bootloader, encryption and login get run again. This looks slightly wacky in the web UI, though - it doesn't show the later runs of each module. We also use the recently added feature to specify `+HDD_1` in the test suites which use a disk image uploaded by an earlier post-install test, so the test suite value will take priority over the value POSTed by the scheduler for those tests, and we will use the uploaded disk image (and not the clean base image POSTed by the scheduler) for those tests. My intent here is to enhance the scheduler, adding a consumer which listens out for critpath updates, and runs this test flow for each one, then reports the results to ResultsDB where Bodhi could query and display them. We could also add a list of other packages to have one or both sets of update tests run on it, I guess. Test Plan: Try a post something like: HDD_1=disk_f25_server_3_x86_64.img DISTRI=fedora VERSION=25 FLAVOR=updates-server ARCH=x86_64 BUILD=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c ADVISORY=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c CURRREL=25 PREVREL=24 Pick an appropriate `ADVISORY` (ideally, one containing some packages which might actually be involved in the tests), and matching `FLAVOR` and `HDD_1`. The appropriate tests should run, a repo with the update packages should be created and enabled (and dnf update run), and the tests should work properly. Also test a regular compose run to make sure I didn't break anything. Reviewers: jskladan, jsedlak Reviewed By: jsedlak Subscribers: tflink Differential Revision: https://phab.qa.fedoraproject.org/D1143
2017-01-25 16:16:12 +00:00
machine => { name => "64bit" },
prio => 42,
product => {
arch => "x86_64",
distri => "fedora",
flavor => "updates-kde",
version => "*",
},
test_suite => { name => "base_selinux" },
},
{
Move update tests into a separate job group This makes them more visible in the web UI.
2017-03-02 05:10:41 +00:00
group_name => "Fedora Updates",
Add support for testing updates Summary: This adds an entirely new workflow for testing distribution updates. The `ADVISORY` variable is introduced: when set, `main.pm` will load an early post-install test that sets up a repository containing the packages from the specified update, runs `dnf -y update`, and reboots. A new templates file is added, `templates-updates`, which adds two new flavors called `updates-server` and `updates-workstation`, each containing job templates for appropriate post-install tests. Scheduler is expected to post `ADVISORY=(update ID) HDD_1=(base image) FLAVOR=updates-(server|workstation)`, where (base image) is one of the stable release base disk images produced by `createhdds` and usually used for upgrade testing. This will result in the appropriate job templates being loaded. We rejig postinstall test loading and static network config a bit so that this works for both the 'compose' and 'updates' test flows: we have to ensure we bring up networking for the tap tests before we try and install the updates, but still allow later adjustment of the configuration. We take advantage of the openQA feature that was added a few months back to run the same module multiple times, so the `_advisory_update` module can reboot after installing the updates and the modules that take care of bootloader, encryption and login get run again. This looks slightly wacky in the web UI, though - it doesn't show the later runs of each module. We also use the recently added feature to specify `+HDD_1` in the test suites which use a disk image uploaded by an earlier post-install test, so the test suite value will take priority over the value POSTed by the scheduler for those tests, and we will use the uploaded disk image (and not the clean base image POSTed by the scheduler) for those tests. My intent here is to enhance the scheduler, adding a consumer which listens out for critpath updates, and runs this test flow for each one, then reports the results to ResultsDB where Bodhi could query and display them. We could also add a list of other packages to have one or both sets of update tests run on it, I guess. Test Plan: Try a post something like: HDD_1=disk_f25_server_3_x86_64.img DISTRI=fedora VERSION=25 FLAVOR=updates-server ARCH=x86_64 BUILD=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c ADVISORY=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c CURRREL=25 PREVREL=24 Pick an appropriate `ADVISORY` (ideally, one containing some packages which might actually be involved in the tests), and matching `FLAVOR` and `HDD_1`. The appropriate tests should run, a repo with the update packages should be created and enabled (and dnf update run), and the tests should work properly. Also test a regular compose run to make sure I didn't break anything. Reviewers: jskladan, jsedlak Reviewed By: jsedlak Subscribers: tflink Differential Revision: https://phab.qa.fedoraproject.org/D1143
2017-01-25 16:16:12 +00:00
machine => { name => "64bit" },
prio => 40,
product => {
arch => "x86_64",
distri => "fedora",
flavor => "updates-workstation",
version => "*",
},
test_suite => { name => "base_services_start" },
},
{
Move update tests into a separate job group This makes them more visible in the web UI.
2017-03-02 05:10:41 +00:00
group_name => "Fedora Updates",
Add support for testing updates Summary: This adds an entirely new workflow for testing distribution updates. The `ADVISORY` variable is introduced: when set, `main.pm` will load an early post-install test that sets up a repository containing the packages from the specified update, runs `dnf -y update`, and reboots. A new templates file is added, `templates-updates`, which adds two new flavors called `updates-server` and `updates-workstation`, each containing job templates for appropriate post-install tests. Scheduler is expected to post `ADVISORY=(update ID) HDD_1=(base image) FLAVOR=updates-(server|workstation)`, where (base image) is one of the stable release base disk images produced by `createhdds` and usually used for upgrade testing. This will result in the appropriate job templates being loaded. We rejig postinstall test loading and static network config a bit so that this works for both the 'compose' and 'updates' test flows: we have to ensure we bring up networking for the tap tests before we try and install the updates, but still allow later adjustment of the configuration. We take advantage of the openQA feature that was added a few months back to run the same module multiple times, so the `_advisory_update` module can reboot after installing the updates and the modules that take care of bootloader, encryption and login get run again. This looks slightly wacky in the web UI, though - it doesn't show the later runs of each module. We also use the recently added feature to specify `+HDD_1` in the test suites which use a disk image uploaded by an earlier post-install test, so the test suite value will take priority over the value POSTed by the scheduler for those tests, and we will use the uploaded disk image (and not the clean base image POSTed by the scheduler) for those tests. My intent here is to enhance the scheduler, adding a consumer which listens out for critpath updates, and runs this test flow for each one, then reports the results to ResultsDB where Bodhi could query and display them. We could also add a list of other packages to have one or both sets of update tests run on it, I guess. Test Plan: Try a post something like: HDD_1=disk_f25_server_3_x86_64.img DISTRI=fedora VERSION=25 FLAVOR=updates-server ARCH=x86_64 BUILD=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c ADVISORY=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c CURRREL=25 PREVREL=24 Pick an appropriate `ADVISORY` (ideally, one containing some packages which might actually be involved in the tests), and matching `FLAVOR` and `HDD_1`. The appropriate tests should run, a repo with the update packages should be created and enabled (and dnf update run), and the tests should work properly. Also test a regular compose run to make sure I didn't break anything. Reviewers: jskladan, jsedlak Reviewed By: jsedlak Subscribers: tflink Differential Revision: https://phab.qa.fedoraproject.org/D1143
2017-01-25 16:16:12 +00:00
machine => { name => "64bit" },
prio => 40,
product => {
arch => "x86_64",
distri => "fedora",
flavor => "updates-server",
version => "*",
},
test_suite => { name => "base_services_start" },
},
{
Move update tests into a separate job group This makes them more visible in the web UI.
2017-03-02 05:10:41 +00:00
group_name => "Fedora Updates",
Add support for testing updates Summary: This adds an entirely new workflow for testing distribution updates. The `ADVISORY` variable is introduced: when set, `main.pm` will load an early post-install test that sets up a repository containing the packages from the specified update, runs `dnf -y update`, and reboots. A new templates file is added, `templates-updates`, which adds two new flavors called `updates-server` and `updates-workstation`, each containing job templates for appropriate post-install tests. Scheduler is expected to post `ADVISORY=(update ID) HDD_1=(base image) FLAVOR=updates-(server|workstation)`, where (base image) is one of the stable release base disk images produced by `createhdds` and usually used for upgrade testing. This will result in the appropriate job templates being loaded. We rejig postinstall test loading and static network config a bit so that this works for both the 'compose' and 'updates' test flows: we have to ensure we bring up networking for the tap tests before we try and install the updates, but still allow later adjustment of the configuration. We take advantage of the openQA feature that was added a few months back to run the same module multiple times, so the `_advisory_update` module can reboot after installing the updates and the modules that take care of bootloader, encryption and login get run again. This looks slightly wacky in the web UI, though - it doesn't show the later runs of each module. We also use the recently added feature to specify `+HDD_1` in the test suites which use a disk image uploaded by an earlier post-install test, so the test suite value will take priority over the value POSTed by the scheduler for those tests, and we will use the uploaded disk image (and not the clean base image POSTed by the scheduler) for those tests. My intent here is to enhance the scheduler, adding a consumer which listens out for critpath updates, and runs this test flow for each one, then reports the results to ResultsDB where Bodhi could query and display them. We could also add a list of other packages to have one or both sets of update tests run on it, I guess. Test Plan: Try a post something like: HDD_1=disk_f25_server_3_x86_64.img DISTRI=fedora VERSION=25 FLAVOR=updates-server ARCH=x86_64 BUILD=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c ADVISORY=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c CURRREL=25 PREVREL=24 Pick an appropriate `ADVISORY` (ideally, one containing some packages which might actually be involved in the tests), and matching `FLAVOR` and `HDD_1`. The appropriate tests should run, a repo with the update packages should be created and enabled (and dnf update run), and the tests should work properly. Also test a regular compose run to make sure I didn't break anything. Reviewers: jskladan, jsedlak Reviewed By: jsedlak Subscribers: tflink Differential Revision: https://phab.qa.fedoraproject.org/D1143
2017-01-25 16:16:12 +00:00
machine => { name => "64bit" },
prio => 42,
product => {
arch => "x86_64",
distri => "fedora",
flavor => "updates-kde",
version => "*",
},
test_suite => { name => "base_services_start" },
},
{
Move update tests into a separate job group This makes them more visible in the web UI.
2017-03-02 05:10:41 +00:00
group_name => "Fedora Updates",
Add support for testing updates Summary: This adds an entirely new workflow for testing distribution updates. The `ADVISORY` variable is introduced: when set, `main.pm` will load an early post-install test that sets up a repository containing the packages from the specified update, runs `dnf -y update`, and reboots. A new templates file is added, `templates-updates`, which adds two new flavors called `updates-server` and `updates-workstation`, each containing job templates for appropriate post-install tests. Scheduler is expected to post `ADVISORY=(update ID) HDD_1=(base image) FLAVOR=updates-(server|workstation)`, where (base image) is one of the stable release base disk images produced by `createhdds` and usually used for upgrade testing. This will result in the appropriate job templates being loaded. We rejig postinstall test loading and static network config a bit so that this works for both the 'compose' and 'updates' test flows: we have to ensure we bring up networking for the tap tests before we try and install the updates, but still allow later adjustment of the configuration. We take advantage of the openQA feature that was added a few months back to run the same module multiple times, so the `_advisory_update` module can reboot after installing the updates and the modules that take care of bootloader, encryption and login get run again. This looks slightly wacky in the web UI, though - it doesn't show the later runs of each module. We also use the recently added feature to specify `+HDD_1` in the test suites which use a disk image uploaded by an earlier post-install test, so the test suite value will take priority over the value POSTed by the scheduler for those tests, and we will use the uploaded disk image (and not the clean base image POSTed by the scheduler) for those tests. My intent here is to enhance the scheduler, adding a consumer which listens out for critpath updates, and runs this test flow for each one, then reports the results to ResultsDB where Bodhi could query and display them. We could also add a list of other packages to have one or both sets of update tests run on it, I guess. Test Plan: Try a post something like: HDD_1=disk_f25_server_3_x86_64.img DISTRI=fedora VERSION=25 FLAVOR=updates-server ARCH=x86_64 BUILD=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c ADVISORY=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c CURRREL=25 PREVREL=24 Pick an appropriate `ADVISORY` (ideally, one containing some packages which might actually be involved in the tests), and matching `FLAVOR` and `HDD_1`. The appropriate tests should run, a repo with the update packages should be created and enabled (and dnf update run), and the tests should work properly. Also test a regular compose run to make sure I didn't break anything. Reviewers: jskladan, jsedlak Reviewed By: jsedlak Subscribers: tflink Differential Revision: https://phab.qa.fedoraproject.org/D1143
2017-01-25 16:16:12 +00:00
machine => { name => "64bit" },
prio => 40,
product => {
arch => "x86_64",
distri => "fedora",
flavor => "updates-workstation",
version => "*",
},
test_suite => { name => "base_service_manipulation" },
},
{
Move update tests into a separate job group This makes them more visible in the web UI.
2017-03-02 05:10:41 +00:00
group_name => "Fedora Updates",
Add support for testing updates Summary: This adds an entirely new workflow for testing distribution updates. The `ADVISORY` variable is introduced: when set, `main.pm` will load an early post-install test that sets up a repository containing the packages from the specified update, runs `dnf -y update`, and reboots. A new templates file is added, `templates-updates`, which adds two new flavors called `updates-server` and `updates-workstation`, each containing job templates for appropriate post-install tests. Scheduler is expected to post `ADVISORY=(update ID) HDD_1=(base image) FLAVOR=updates-(server|workstation)`, where (base image) is one of the stable release base disk images produced by `createhdds` and usually used for upgrade testing. This will result in the appropriate job templates being loaded. We rejig postinstall test loading and static network config a bit so that this works for both the 'compose' and 'updates' test flows: we have to ensure we bring up networking for the tap tests before we try and install the updates, but still allow later adjustment of the configuration. We take advantage of the openQA feature that was added a few months back to run the same module multiple times, so the `_advisory_update` module can reboot after installing the updates and the modules that take care of bootloader, encryption and login get run again. This looks slightly wacky in the web UI, though - it doesn't show the later runs of each module. We also use the recently added feature to specify `+HDD_1` in the test suites which use a disk image uploaded by an earlier post-install test, so the test suite value will take priority over the value POSTed by the scheduler for those tests, and we will use the uploaded disk image (and not the clean base image POSTed by the scheduler) for those tests. My intent here is to enhance the scheduler, adding a consumer which listens out for critpath updates, and runs this test flow for each one, then reports the results to ResultsDB where Bodhi could query and display them. We could also add a list of other packages to have one or both sets of update tests run on it, I guess. Test Plan: Try a post something like: HDD_1=disk_f25_server_3_x86_64.img DISTRI=fedora VERSION=25 FLAVOR=updates-server ARCH=x86_64 BUILD=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c ADVISORY=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c CURRREL=25 PREVREL=24 Pick an appropriate `ADVISORY` (ideally, one containing some packages which might actually be involved in the tests), and matching `FLAVOR` and `HDD_1`. The appropriate tests should run, a repo with the update packages should be created and enabled (and dnf update run), and the tests should work properly. Also test a regular compose run to make sure I didn't break anything. Reviewers: jskladan, jsedlak Reviewed By: jsedlak Subscribers: tflink Differential Revision: https://phab.qa.fedoraproject.org/D1143
2017-01-25 16:16:12 +00:00
machine => { name => "64bit" },
prio => 40,
product => {
arch => "x86_64",
distri => "fedora",
flavor => "updates-server",
version => "*",
},
test_suite => { name => "base_service_manipulation" },
},
{
Move update tests into a separate job group This makes them more visible in the web UI.
2017-03-02 05:10:41 +00:00
group_name => "Fedora Updates",
Add support for testing updates Summary: This adds an entirely new workflow for testing distribution updates. The `ADVISORY` variable is introduced: when set, `main.pm` will load an early post-install test that sets up a repository containing the packages from the specified update, runs `dnf -y update`, and reboots. A new templates file is added, `templates-updates`, which adds two new flavors called `updates-server` and `updates-workstation`, each containing job templates for appropriate post-install tests. Scheduler is expected to post `ADVISORY=(update ID) HDD_1=(base image) FLAVOR=updates-(server|workstation)`, where (base image) is one of the stable release base disk images produced by `createhdds` and usually used for upgrade testing. This will result in the appropriate job templates being loaded. We rejig postinstall test loading and static network config a bit so that this works for both the 'compose' and 'updates' test flows: we have to ensure we bring up networking for the tap tests before we try and install the updates, but still allow later adjustment of the configuration. We take advantage of the openQA feature that was added a few months back to run the same module multiple times, so the `_advisory_update` module can reboot after installing the updates and the modules that take care of bootloader, encryption and login get run again. This looks slightly wacky in the web UI, though - it doesn't show the later runs of each module. We also use the recently added feature to specify `+HDD_1` in the test suites which use a disk image uploaded by an earlier post-install test, so the test suite value will take priority over the value POSTed by the scheduler for those tests, and we will use the uploaded disk image (and not the clean base image POSTed by the scheduler) for those tests. My intent here is to enhance the scheduler, adding a consumer which listens out for critpath updates, and runs this test flow for each one, then reports the results to ResultsDB where Bodhi could query and display them. We could also add a list of other packages to have one or both sets of update tests run on it, I guess. Test Plan: Try a post something like: HDD_1=disk_f25_server_3_x86_64.img DISTRI=fedora VERSION=25 FLAVOR=updates-server ARCH=x86_64 BUILD=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c ADVISORY=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c CURRREL=25 PREVREL=24 Pick an appropriate `ADVISORY` (ideally, one containing some packages which might actually be involved in the tests), and matching `FLAVOR` and `HDD_1`. The appropriate tests should run, a repo with the update packages should be created and enabled (and dnf update run), and the tests should work properly. Also test a regular compose run to make sure I didn't break anything. Reviewers: jskladan, jsedlak Reviewed By: jsedlak Subscribers: tflink Differential Revision: https://phab.qa.fedoraproject.org/D1143
2017-01-25 16:16:12 +00:00
machine => { name => "64bit" },
prio => 42,
product => {
arch => "x86_64",
distri => "fedora",
flavor => "updates-kde",
version => "*",
},
test_suite => { name => "base_service_manipulation" },
},
{
Move update tests into a separate job group This makes them more visible in the web UI.
2017-03-02 05:10:41 +00:00
group_name => "Fedora Updates",
Add support for testing updates Summary: This adds an entirely new workflow for testing distribution updates. The `ADVISORY` variable is introduced: when set, `main.pm` will load an early post-install test that sets up a repository containing the packages from the specified update, runs `dnf -y update`, and reboots. A new templates file is added, `templates-updates`, which adds two new flavors called `updates-server` and `updates-workstation`, each containing job templates for appropriate post-install tests. Scheduler is expected to post `ADVISORY=(update ID) HDD_1=(base image) FLAVOR=updates-(server|workstation)`, where (base image) is one of the stable release base disk images produced by `createhdds` and usually used for upgrade testing. This will result in the appropriate job templates being loaded. We rejig postinstall test loading and static network config a bit so that this works for both the 'compose' and 'updates' test flows: we have to ensure we bring up networking for the tap tests before we try and install the updates, but still allow later adjustment of the configuration. We take advantage of the openQA feature that was added a few months back to run the same module multiple times, so the `_advisory_update` module can reboot after installing the updates and the modules that take care of bootloader, encryption and login get run again. This looks slightly wacky in the web UI, though - it doesn't show the later runs of each module. We also use the recently added feature to specify `+HDD_1` in the test suites which use a disk image uploaded by an earlier post-install test, so the test suite value will take priority over the value POSTed by the scheduler for those tests, and we will use the uploaded disk image (and not the clean base image POSTed by the scheduler) for those tests. My intent here is to enhance the scheduler, adding a consumer which listens out for critpath updates, and runs this test flow for each one, then reports the results to ResultsDB where Bodhi could query and display them. We could also add a list of other packages to have one or both sets of update tests run on it, I guess. Test Plan: Try a post something like: HDD_1=disk_f25_server_3_x86_64.img DISTRI=fedora VERSION=25 FLAVOR=updates-server ARCH=x86_64 BUILD=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c ADVISORY=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c CURRREL=25 PREVREL=24 Pick an appropriate `ADVISORY` (ideally, one containing some packages which might actually be involved in the tests), and matching `FLAVOR` and `HDD_1`. The appropriate tests should run, a repo with the update packages should be created and enabled (and dnf update run), and the tests should work properly. Also test a regular compose run to make sure I didn't break anything. Reviewers: jskladan, jsedlak Reviewed By: jsedlak Subscribers: tflink Differential Revision: https://phab.qa.fedoraproject.org/D1143
2017-01-25 16:16:12 +00:00
machine => { name => "64bit" },
prio => 40,
product => {
arch => "x86_64",
distri => "fedora",
flavor => "updates-workstation",
version => "*",
},
test_suite => { name => "base_update_cli" },
},
{
Move update tests into a separate job group This makes them more visible in the web UI.
2017-03-02 05:10:41 +00:00
group_name => "Fedora Updates",
Add support for testing updates Summary: This adds an entirely new workflow for testing distribution updates. The `ADVISORY` variable is introduced: when set, `main.pm` will load an early post-install test that sets up a repository containing the packages from the specified update, runs `dnf -y update`, and reboots. A new templates file is added, `templates-updates`, which adds two new flavors called `updates-server` and `updates-workstation`, each containing job templates for appropriate post-install tests. Scheduler is expected to post `ADVISORY=(update ID) HDD_1=(base image) FLAVOR=updates-(server|workstation)`, where (base image) is one of the stable release base disk images produced by `createhdds` and usually used for upgrade testing. This will result in the appropriate job templates being loaded. We rejig postinstall test loading and static network config a bit so that this works for both the 'compose' and 'updates' test flows: we have to ensure we bring up networking for the tap tests before we try and install the updates, but still allow later adjustment of the configuration. We take advantage of the openQA feature that was added a few months back to run the same module multiple times, so the `_advisory_update` module can reboot after installing the updates and the modules that take care of bootloader, encryption and login get run again. This looks slightly wacky in the web UI, though - it doesn't show the later runs of each module. We also use the recently added feature to specify `+HDD_1` in the test suites which use a disk image uploaded by an earlier post-install test, so the test suite value will take priority over the value POSTed by the scheduler for those tests, and we will use the uploaded disk image (and not the clean base image POSTed by the scheduler) for those tests. My intent here is to enhance the scheduler, adding a consumer which listens out for critpath updates, and runs this test flow for each one, then reports the results to ResultsDB where Bodhi could query and display them. We could also add a list of other packages to have one or both sets of update tests run on it, I guess. Test Plan: Try a post something like: HDD_1=disk_f25_server_3_x86_64.img DISTRI=fedora VERSION=25 FLAVOR=updates-server ARCH=x86_64 BUILD=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c ADVISORY=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c CURRREL=25 PREVREL=24 Pick an appropriate `ADVISORY` (ideally, one containing some packages which might actually be involved in the tests), and matching `FLAVOR` and `HDD_1`. The appropriate tests should run, a repo with the update packages should be created and enabled (and dnf update run), and the tests should work properly. Also test a regular compose run to make sure I didn't break anything. Reviewers: jskladan, jsedlak Reviewed By: jsedlak Subscribers: tflink Differential Revision: https://phab.qa.fedoraproject.org/D1143
2017-01-25 16:16:12 +00:00
machine => { name => "64bit" },
prio => 40,
product => {
arch => "x86_64",
distri => "fedora",
flavor => "updates-server",
version => "*",
},
test_suite => { name => "base_update_cli" },
},
{
Move update tests into a separate job group This makes them more visible in the web UI.
2017-03-02 05:10:41 +00:00
group_name => "Fedora Updates",
Add support for testing updates Summary: This adds an entirely new workflow for testing distribution updates. The `ADVISORY` variable is introduced: when set, `main.pm` will load an early post-install test that sets up a repository containing the packages from the specified update, runs `dnf -y update`, and reboots. A new templates file is added, `templates-updates`, which adds two new flavors called `updates-server` and `updates-workstation`, each containing job templates for appropriate post-install tests. Scheduler is expected to post `ADVISORY=(update ID) HDD_1=(base image) FLAVOR=updates-(server|workstation)`, where (base image) is one of the stable release base disk images produced by `createhdds` and usually used for upgrade testing. This will result in the appropriate job templates being loaded. We rejig postinstall test loading and static network config a bit so that this works for both the 'compose' and 'updates' test flows: we have to ensure we bring up networking for the tap tests before we try and install the updates, but still allow later adjustment of the configuration. We take advantage of the openQA feature that was added a few months back to run the same module multiple times, so the `_advisory_update` module can reboot after installing the updates and the modules that take care of bootloader, encryption and login get run again. This looks slightly wacky in the web UI, though - it doesn't show the later runs of each module. We also use the recently added feature to specify `+HDD_1` in the test suites which use a disk image uploaded by an earlier post-install test, so the test suite value will take priority over the value POSTed by the scheduler for those tests, and we will use the uploaded disk image (and not the clean base image POSTed by the scheduler) for those tests. My intent here is to enhance the scheduler, adding a consumer which listens out for critpath updates, and runs this test flow for each one, then reports the results to ResultsDB where Bodhi could query and display them. We could also add a list of other packages to have one or both sets of update tests run on it, I guess. Test Plan: Try a post something like: HDD_1=disk_f25_server_3_x86_64.img DISTRI=fedora VERSION=25 FLAVOR=updates-server ARCH=x86_64 BUILD=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c ADVISORY=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c CURRREL=25 PREVREL=24 Pick an appropriate `ADVISORY` (ideally, one containing some packages which might actually be involved in the tests), and matching `FLAVOR` and `HDD_1`. The appropriate tests should run, a repo with the update packages should be created and enabled (and dnf update run), and the tests should work properly. Also test a regular compose run to make sure I didn't break anything. Reviewers: jskladan, jsedlak Reviewed By: jsedlak Subscribers: tflink Differential Revision: https://phab.qa.fedoraproject.org/D1143
2017-01-25 16:16:12 +00:00
machine => { name => "64bit" },
prio => 42,
product => {
arch => "x86_64",
distri => "fedora",
flavor => "updates-kde",
version => "*",
},
test_suite => { name => "base_update_cli" },
},
{
Move update tests into a separate job group This makes them more visible in the web UI.
2017-03-02 05:10:41 +00:00
group_name => "Fedora Updates",
Add support for testing updates Summary: This adds an entirely new workflow for testing distribution updates. The `ADVISORY` variable is introduced: when set, `main.pm` will load an early post-install test that sets up a repository containing the packages from the specified update, runs `dnf -y update`, and reboots. A new templates file is added, `templates-updates`, which adds two new flavors called `updates-server` and `updates-workstation`, each containing job templates for appropriate post-install tests. Scheduler is expected to post `ADVISORY=(update ID) HDD_1=(base image) FLAVOR=updates-(server|workstation)`, where (base image) is one of the stable release base disk images produced by `createhdds` and usually used for upgrade testing. This will result in the appropriate job templates being loaded. We rejig postinstall test loading and static network config a bit so that this works for both the 'compose' and 'updates' test flows: we have to ensure we bring up networking for the tap tests before we try and install the updates, but still allow later adjustment of the configuration. We take advantage of the openQA feature that was added a few months back to run the same module multiple times, so the `_advisory_update` module can reboot after installing the updates and the modules that take care of bootloader, encryption and login get run again. This looks slightly wacky in the web UI, though - it doesn't show the later runs of each module. We also use the recently added feature to specify `+HDD_1` in the test suites which use a disk image uploaded by an earlier post-install test, so the test suite value will take priority over the value POSTed by the scheduler for those tests, and we will use the uploaded disk image (and not the clean base image POSTed by the scheduler) for those tests. My intent here is to enhance the scheduler, adding a consumer which listens out for critpath updates, and runs this test flow for each one, then reports the results to ResultsDB where Bodhi could query and display them. We could also add a list of other packages to have one or both sets of update tests run on it, I guess. Test Plan: Try a post something like: HDD_1=disk_f25_server_3_x86_64.img DISTRI=fedora VERSION=25 FLAVOR=updates-server ARCH=x86_64 BUILD=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c ADVISORY=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c CURRREL=25 PREVREL=24 Pick an appropriate `ADVISORY` (ideally, one containing some packages which might actually be involved in the tests), and matching `FLAVOR` and `HDD_1`. The appropriate tests should run, a repo with the update packages should be created and enabled (and dnf update run), and the tests should work properly. Also test a regular compose run to make sure I didn't break anything. Reviewers: jskladan, jsedlak Reviewed By: jsedlak Subscribers: tflink Differential Revision: https://phab.qa.fedoraproject.org/D1143
2017-01-25 16:16:12 +00:00
machine => { name => "64bit" },
prio => 30,
product => {
arch => "x86_64",
distri => "fedora",
flavor => "updates-workstation",
version => "*",
},
test_suite => { name => "desktop_update_graphical" },
},
{
Move update tests into a separate job group This makes them more visible in the web UI.
2017-03-02 05:10:41 +00:00
group_name => "Fedora Updates",
Add support for testing updates Summary: This adds an entirely new workflow for testing distribution updates. The `ADVISORY` variable is introduced: when set, `main.pm` will load an early post-install test that sets up a repository containing the packages from the specified update, runs `dnf -y update`, and reboots. A new templates file is added, `templates-updates`, which adds two new flavors called `updates-server` and `updates-workstation`, each containing job templates for appropriate post-install tests. Scheduler is expected to post `ADVISORY=(update ID) HDD_1=(base image) FLAVOR=updates-(server|workstation)`, where (base image) is one of the stable release base disk images produced by `createhdds` and usually used for upgrade testing. This will result in the appropriate job templates being loaded. We rejig postinstall test loading and static network config a bit so that this works for both the 'compose' and 'updates' test flows: we have to ensure we bring up networking for the tap tests before we try and install the updates, but still allow later adjustment of the configuration. We take advantage of the openQA feature that was added a few months back to run the same module multiple times, so the `_advisory_update` module can reboot after installing the updates and the modules that take care of bootloader, encryption and login get run again. This looks slightly wacky in the web UI, though - it doesn't show the later runs of each module. We also use the recently added feature to specify `+HDD_1` in the test suites which use a disk image uploaded by an earlier post-install test, so the test suite value will take priority over the value POSTed by the scheduler for those tests, and we will use the uploaded disk image (and not the clean base image POSTed by the scheduler) for those tests. My intent here is to enhance the scheduler, adding a consumer which listens out for critpath updates, and runs this test flow for each one, then reports the results to ResultsDB where Bodhi could query and display them. We could also add a list of other packages to have one or both sets of update tests run on it, I guess. Test Plan: Try a post something like: HDD_1=disk_f25_server_3_x86_64.img DISTRI=fedora VERSION=25 FLAVOR=updates-server ARCH=x86_64 BUILD=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c ADVISORY=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c CURRREL=25 PREVREL=24 Pick an appropriate `ADVISORY` (ideally, one containing some packages which might actually be involved in the tests), and matching `FLAVOR` and `HDD_1`. The appropriate tests should run, a repo with the update packages should be created and enabled (and dnf update run), and the tests should work properly. Also test a regular compose run to make sure I didn't break anything. Reviewers: jskladan, jsedlak Reviewed By: jsedlak Subscribers: tflink Differential Revision: https://phab.qa.fedoraproject.org/D1143
2017-01-25 16:16:12 +00:00
machine => { name => "64bit" },
prio => 32,
product => {
arch => "x86_64",
distri => "fedora",
flavor => "updates-kde",
version => "*",
},
test_suite => { name => "desktop_update_graphical" },
},
{
Move update tests into a separate job group This makes them more visible in the web UI.
2017-03-02 05:10:41 +00:00
group_name => "Fedora Updates",
Add support for testing updates Summary: This adds an entirely new workflow for testing distribution updates. The `ADVISORY` variable is introduced: when set, `main.pm` will load an early post-install test that sets up a repository containing the packages from the specified update, runs `dnf -y update`, and reboots. A new templates file is added, `templates-updates`, which adds two new flavors called `updates-server` and `updates-workstation`, each containing job templates for appropriate post-install tests. Scheduler is expected to post `ADVISORY=(update ID) HDD_1=(base image) FLAVOR=updates-(server|workstation)`, where (base image) is one of the stable release base disk images produced by `createhdds` and usually used for upgrade testing. This will result in the appropriate job templates being loaded. We rejig postinstall test loading and static network config a bit so that this works for both the 'compose' and 'updates' test flows: we have to ensure we bring up networking for the tap tests before we try and install the updates, but still allow later adjustment of the configuration. We take advantage of the openQA feature that was added a few months back to run the same module multiple times, so the `_advisory_update` module can reboot after installing the updates and the modules that take care of bootloader, encryption and login get run again. This looks slightly wacky in the web UI, though - it doesn't show the later runs of each module. We also use the recently added feature to specify `+HDD_1` in the test suites which use a disk image uploaded by an earlier post-install test, so the test suite value will take priority over the value POSTed by the scheduler for those tests, and we will use the uploaded disk image (and not the clean base image POSTed by the scheduler) for those tests. My intent here is to enhance the scheduler, adding a consumer which listens out for critpath updates, and runs this test flow for each one, then reports the results to ResultsDB where Bodhi could query and display them. We could also add a list of other packages to have one or both sets of update tests run on it, I guess. Test Plan: Try a post something like: HDD_1=disk_f25_server_3_x86_64.img DISTRI=fedora VERSION=25 FLAVOR=updates-server ARCH=x86_64 BUILD=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c ADVISORY=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c CURRREL=25 PREVREL=24 Pick an appropriate `ADVISORY` (ideally, one containing some packages which might actually be involved in the tests), and matching `FLAVOR` and `HDD_1`. The appropriate tests should run, a repo with the update packages should be created and enabled (and dnf update run), and the tests should work properly. Also test a regular compose run to make sure I didn't break anything. Reviewers: jskladan, jsedlak Reviewed By: jsedlak Subscribers: tflink Differential Revision: https://phab.qa.fedoraproject.org/D1143
2017-01-25 16:16:12 +00:00
machine => { name => "64bit" },
prio => 30,
product => {
arch => "x86_64",
distri => "fedora",
flavor => "updates-workstation",
version => "*",
},
test_suite => { name => "desktop_terminal" },
},
{
Move update tests into a separate job group This makes them more visible in the web UI.
2017-03-02 05:10:41 +00:00
group_name => "Fedora Updates",
Add support for testing updates Summary: This adds an entirely new workflow for testing distribution updates. The `ADVISORY` variable is introduced: when set, `main.pm` will load an early post-install test that sets up a repository containing the packages from the specified update, runs `dnf -y update`, and reboots. A new templates file is added, `templates-updates`, which adds two new flavors called `updates-server` and `updates-workstation`, each containing job templates for appropriate post-install tests. Scheduler is expected to post `ADVISORY=(update ID) HDD_1=(base image) FLAVOR=updates-(server|workstation)`, where (base image) is one of the stable release base disk images produced by `createhdds` and usually used for upgrade testing. This will result in the appropriate job templates being loaded. We rejig postinstall test loading and static network config a bit so that this works for both the 'compose' and 'updates' test flows: we have to ensure we bring up networking for the tap tests before we try and install the updates, but still allow later adjustment of the configuration. We take advantage of the openQA feature that was added a few months back to run the same module multiple times, so the `_advisory_update` module can reboot after installing the updates and the modules that take care of bootloader, encryption and login get run again. This looks slightly wacky in the web UI, though - it doesn't show the later runs of each module. We also use the recently added feature to specify `+HDD_1` in the test suites which use a disk image uploaded by an earlier post-install test, so the test suite value will take priority over the value POSTed by the scheduler for those tests, and we will use the uploaded disk image (and not the clean base image POSTed by the scheduler) for those tests. My intent here is to enhance the scheduler, adding a consumer which listens out for critpath updates, and runs this test flow for each one, then reports the results to ResultsDB where Bodhi could query and display them. We could also add a list of other packages to have one or both sets of update tests run on it, I guess. Test Plan: Try a post something like: HDD_1=disk_f25_server_3_x86_64.img DISTRI=fedora VERSION=25 FLAVOR=updates-server ARCH=x86_64 BUILD=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c ADVISORY=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c CURRREL=25 PREVREL=24 Pick an appropriate `ADVISORY` (ideally, one containing some packages which might actually be involved in the tests), and matching `FLAVOR` and `HDD_1`. The appropriate tests should run, a repo with the update packages should be created and enabled (and dnf update run), and the tests should work properly. Also test a regular compose run to make sure I didn't break anything. Reviewers: jskladan, jsedlak Reviewed By: jsedlak Subscribers: tflink Differential Revision: https://phab.qa.fedoraproject.org/D1143
2017-01-25 16:16:12 +00:00
machine => { name => "64bit" },
prio => 32,
product => {
arch => "x86_64",
distri => "fedora",
flavor => "updates-kde",
version => "*",
},
test_suite => { name => "desktop_terminal" },
},
{
Move update tests into a separate job group This makes them more visible in the web UI.
2017-03-02 05:10:41 +00:00
group_name => "Fedora Updates",
Add support for testing updates Summary: This adds an entirely new workflow for testing distribution updates. The `ADVISORY` variable is introduced: when set, `main.pm` will load an early post-install test that sets up a repository containing the packages from the specified update, runs `dnf -y update`, and reboots. A new templates file is added, `templates-updates`, which adds two new flavors called `updates-server` and `updates-workstation`, each containing job templates for appropriate post-install tests. Scheduler is expected to post `ADVISORY=(update ID) HDD_1=(base image) FLAVOR=updates-(server|workstation)`, where (base image) is one of the stable release base disk images produced by `createhdds` and usually used for upgrade testing. This will result in the appropriate job templates being loaded. We rejig postinstall test loading and static network config a bit so that this works for both the 'compose' and 'updates' test flows: we have to ensure we bring up networking for the tap tests before we try and install the updates, but still allow later adjustment of the configuration. We take advantage of the openQA feature that was added a few months back to run the same module multiple times, so the `_advisory_update` module can reboot after installing the updates and the modules that take care of bootloader, encryption and login get run again. This looks slightly wacky in the web UI, though - it doesn't show the later runs of each module. We also use the recently added feature to specify `+HDD_1` in the test suites which use a disk image uploaded by an earlier post-install test, so the test suite value will take priority over the value POSTed by the scheduler for those tests, and we will use the uploaded disk image (and not the clean base image POSTed by the scheduler) for those tests. My intent here is to enhance the scheduler, adding a consumer which listens out for critpath updates, and runs this test flow for each one, then reports the results to ResultsDB where Bodhi could query and display them. We could also add a list of other packages to have one or both sets of update tests run on it, I guess. Test Plan: Try a post something like: HDD_1=disk_f25_server_3_x86_64.img DISTRI=fedora VERSION=25 FLAVOR=updates-server ARCH=x86_64 BUILD=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c ADVISORY=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c CURRREL=25 PREVREL=24 Pick an appropriate `ADVISORY` (ideally, one containing some packages which might actually be involved in the tests), and matching `FLAVOR` and `HDD_1`. The appropriate tests should run, a repo with the update packages should be created and enabled (and dnf update run), and the tests should work properly. Also test a regular compose run to make sure I didn't break anything. Reviewers: jskladan, jsedlak Reviewed By: jsedlak Subscribers: tflink Differential Revision: https://phab.qa.fedoraproject.org/D1143
2017-01-25 16:16:12 +00:00
machine => { name => "64bit" },
prio => 30,
product => {
arch => "x86_64",
distri => "fedora",
flavor => "updates-workstation",
version => "*",
},
test_suite => { name => "desktop_browser" },
},
{
Move update tests into a separate job group This makes them more visible in the web UI.
2017-03-02 05:10:41 +00:00
group_name => "Fedora Updates",
Add support for testing updates Summary: This adds an entirely new workflow for testing distribution updates. The `ADVISORY` variable is introduced: when set, `main.pm` will load an early post-install test that sets up a repository containing the packages from the specified update, runs `dnf -y update`, and reboots. A new templates file is added, `templates-updates`, which adds two new flavors called `updates-server` and `updates-workstation`, each containing job templates for appropriate post-install tests. Scheduler is expected to post `ADVISORY=(update ID) HDD_1=(base image) FLAVOR=updates-(server|workstation)`, where (base image) is one of the stable release base disk images produced by `createhdds` and usually used for upgrade testing. This will result in the appropriate job templates being loaded. We rejig postinstall test loading and static network config a bit so that this works for both the 'compose' and 'updates' test flows: we have to ensure we bring up networking for the tap tests before we try and install the updates, but still allow later adjustment of the configuration. We take advantage of the openQA feature that was added a few months back to run the same module multiple times, so the `_advisory_update` module can reboot after installing the updates and the modules that take care of bootloader, encryption and login get run again. This looks slightly wacky in the web UI, though - it doesn't show the later runs of each module. We also use the recently added feature to specify `+HDD_1` in the test suites which use a disk image uploaded by an earlier post-install test, so the test suite value will take priority over the value POSTed by the scheduler for those tests, and we will use the uploaded disk image (and not the clean base image POSTed by the scheduler) for those tests. My intent here is to enhance the scheduler, adding a consumer which listens out for critpath updates, and runs this test flow for each one, then reports the results to ResultsDB where Bodhi could query and display them. We could also add a list of other packages to have one or both sets of update tests run on it, I guess. Test Plan: Try a post something like: HDD_1=disk_f25_server_3_x86_64.img DISTRI=fedora VERSION=25 FLAVOR=updates-server ARCH=x86_64 BUILD=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c ADVISORY=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c CURRREL=25 PREVREL=24 Pick an appropriate `ADVISORY` (ideally, one containing some packages which might actually be involved in the tests), and matching `FLAVOR` and `HDD_1`. The appropriate tests should run, a repo with the update packages should be created and enabled (and dnf update run), and the tests should work properly. Also test a regular compose run to make sure I didn't break anything. Reviewers: jskladan, jsedlak Reviewed By: jsedlak Subscribers: tflink Differential Revision: https://phab.qa.fedoraproject.org/D1143
2017-01-25 16:16:12 +00:00
machine => { name => "64bit" },
prio => 32,
product => {
arch => "x86_64",
distri => "fedora",
flavor => "updates-kde",
version => "*",
},
test_suite => { name => "desktop_browser" },
},
Add Workstation upgrade test to update tests Since we set up this whole process to run upgrade tests for updates to run the FreeIPA ones on the Server base image, it should be easy to also run Workstation upgrade tests on the Workstation base image. So let's do that! Let's do the most complex test only, the encrypted upgrade one. Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
2018-04-27 23:46:56 +00:00
{
group_name => "Fedora Updates",
machine => { name => "64bit" },
prio => 40,
product => {
arch => "x86_64",
distri => "fedora",
flavor => "updates-workstation-upgrade",
version => "*",
},
test_suite => { name => "upgrade_desktop_encrypted_64bit" },
},
Add support for testing updates Summary: This adds an entirely new workflow for testing distribution updates. The `ADVISORY` variable is introduced: when set, `main.pm` will load an early post-install test that sets up a repository containing the packages from the specified update, runs `dnf -y update`, and reboots. A new templates file is added, `templates-updates`, which adds two new flavors called `updates-server` and `updates-workstation`, each containing job templates for appropriate post-install tests. Scheduler is expected to post `ADVISORY=(update ID) HDD_1=(base image) FLAVOR=updates-(server|workstation)`, where (base image) is one of the stable release base disk images produced by `createhdds` and usually used for upgrade testing. This will result in the appropriate job templates being loaded. We rejig postinstall test loading and static network config a bit so that this works for both the 'compose' and 'updates' test flows: we have to ensure we bring up networking for the tap tests before we try and install the updates, but still allow later adjustment of the configuration. We take advantage of the openQA feature that was added a few months back to run the same module multiple times, so the `_advisory_update` module can reboot after installing the updates and the modules that take care of bootloader, encryption and login get run again. This looks slightly wacky in the web UI, though - it doesn't show the later runs of each module. We also use the recently added feature to specify `+HDD_1` in the test suites which use a disk image uploaded by an earlier post-install test, so the test suite value will take priority over the value POSTed by the scheduler for those tests, and we will use the uploaded disk image (and not the clean base image POSTed by the scheduler) for those tests. My intent here is to enhance the scheduler, adding a consumer which listens out for critpath updates, and runs this test flow for each one, then reports the results to ResultsDB where Bodhi could query and display them. We could also add a list of other packages to have one or both sets of update tests run on it, I guess. Test Plan: Try a post something like: HDD_1=disk_f25_server_3_x86_64.img DISTRI=fedora VERSION=25 FLAVOR=updates-server ARCH=x86_64 BUILD=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c ADVISORY=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c CURRREL=25 PREVREL=24 Pick an appropriate `ADVISORY` (ideally, one containing some packages which might actually be involved in the tests), and matching `FLAVOR` and `HDD_1`. The appropriate tests should run, a repo with the update packages should be created and enabled (and dnf update run), and the tests should work properly. Also test a regular compose run to make sure I didn't break anything. Reviewers: jskladan, jsedlak Reviewed By: jsedlak Subscribers: tflink Differential Revision: https://phab.qa.fedoraproject.org/D1143
2017-01-25 16:16:12 +00:00
{
Move update tests into a separate job group This makes them more visible in the web UI.
2017-03-02 05:10:41 +00:00
group_name => "Fedora Updates",
Add support for testing updates Summary: This adds an entirely new workflow for testing distribution updates. The `ADVISORY` variable is introduced: when set, `main.pm` will load an early post-install test that sets up a repository containing the packages from the specified update, runs `dnf -y update`, and reboots. A new templates file is added, `templates-updates`, which adds two new flavors called `updates-server` and `updates-workstation`, each containing job templates for appropriate post-install tests. Scheduler is expected to post `ADVISORY=(update ID) HDD_1=(base image) FLAVOR=updates-(server|workstation)`, where (base image) is one of the stable release base disk images produced by `createhdds` and usually used for upgrade testing. This will result in the appropriate job templates being loaded. We rejig postinstall test loading and static network config a bit so that this works for both the 'compose' and 'updates' test flows: we have to ensure we bring up networking for the tap tests before we try and install the updates, but still allow later adjustment of the configuration. We take advantage of the openQA feature that was added a few months back to run the same module multiple times, so the `_advisory_update` module can reboot after installing the updates and the modules that take care of bootloader, encryption and login get run again. This looks slightly wacky in the web UI, though - it doesn't show the later runs of each module. We also use the recently added feature to specify `+HDD_1` in the test suites which use a disk image uploaded by an earlier post-install test, so the test suite value will take priority over the value POSTed by the scheduler for those tests, and we will use the uploaded disk image (and not the clean base image POSTed by the scheduler) for those tests. My intent here is to enhance the scheduler, adding a consumer which listens out for critpath updates, and runs this test flow for each one, then reports the results to ResultsDB where Bodhi could query and display them. We could also add a list of other packages to have one or both sets of update tests run on it, I guess. Test Plan: Try a post something like: HDD_1=disk_f25_server_3_x86_64.img DISTRI=fedora VERSION=25 FLAVOR=updates-server ARCH=x86_64 BUILD=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c ADVISORY=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c CURRREL=25 PREVREL=24 Pick an appropriate `ADVISORY` (ideally, one containing some packages which might actually be involved in the tests), and matching `FLAVOR` and `HDD_1`. The appropriate tests should run, a repo with the update packages should be created and enabled (and dnf update run), and the tests should work properly. Also test a regular compose run to make sure I didn't break anything. Reviewers: jskladan, jsedlak Reviewed By: jsedlak Subscribers: tflink Differential Revision: https://phab.qa.fedoraproject.org/D1143
2017-01-25 16:16:12 +00:00
machine => { name => "64bit" },
prio => 40,
product => {
arch => "x86_64",
distri => "fedora",
flavor => "updates-server",
version => "*",
},
test_suite => { name => "server_role_deploy_domain_controller" },
},
{
Move update tests into a separate job group This makes them more visible in the web UI.
2017-03-02 05:10:41 +00:00
group_name => "Fedora Updates",
Add support for testing updates Summary: This adds an entirely new workflow for testing distribution updates. The `ADVISORY` variable is introduced: when set, `main.pm` will load an early post-install test that sets up a repository containing the packages from the specified update, runs `dnf -y update`, and reboots. A new templates file is added, `templates-updates`, which adds two new flavors called `updates-server` and `updates-workstation`, each containing job templates for appropriate post-install tests. Scheduler is expected to post `ADVISORY=(update ID) HDD_1=(base image) FLAVOR=updates-(server|workstation)`, where (base image) is one of the stable release base disk images produced by `createhdds` and usually used for upgrade testing. This will result in the appropriate job templates being loaded. We rejig postinstall test loading and static network config a bit so that this works for both the 'compose' and 'updates' test flows: we have to ensure we bring up networking for the tap tests before we try and install the updates, but still allow later adjustment of the configuration. We take advantage of the openQA feature that was added a few months back to run the same module multiple times, so the `_advisory_update` module can reboot after installing the updates and the modules that take care of bootloader, encryption and login get run again. This looks slightly wacky in the web UI, though - it doesn't show the later runs of each module. We also use the recently added feature to specify `+HDD_1` in the test suites which use a disk image uploaded by an earlier post-install test, so the test suite value will take priority over the value POSTed by the scheduler for those tests, and we will use the uploaded disk image (and not the clean base image POSTed by the scheduler) for those tests. My intent here is to enhance the scheduler, adding a consumer which listens out for critpath updates, and runs this test flow for each one, then reports the results to ResultsDB where Bodhi could query and display them. We could also add a list of other packages to have one or both sets of update tests run on it, I guess. Test Plan: Try a post something like: HDD_1=disk_f25_server_3_x86_64.img DISTRI=fedora VERSION=25 FLAVOR=updates-server ARCH=x86_64 BUILD=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c ADVISORY=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c CURRREL=25 PREVREL=24 Pick an appropriate `ADVISORY` (ideally, one containing some packages which might actually be involved in the tests), and matching `FLAVOR` and `HDD_1`. The appropriate tests should run, a repo with the update packages should be created and enabled (and dnf update run), and the tests should work properly. Also test a regular compose run to make sure I didn't break anything. Reviewers: jskladan, jsedlak Reviewed By: jsedlak Subscribers: tflink Differential Revision: https://phab.qa.fedoraproject.org/D1143
2017-01-25 16:16:12 +00:00
machine => { name => "64bit" },
prio => 40,
product => {
arch => "x86_64",
distri => "fedora",
flavor => "updates-server",
version => "*",
},
test_suite => { name => "server_cockpit_default" },
},
{
Move update tests into a separate job group This makes them more visible in the web UI.
2017-03-02 05:10:41 +00:00
group_name => "Fedora Updates",
Add support for testing updates Summary: This adds an entirely new workflow for testing distribution updates. The `ADVISORY` variable is introduced: when set, `main.pm` will load an early post-install test that sets up a repository containing the packages from the specified update, runs `dnf -y update`, and reboots. A new templates file is added, `templates-updates`, which adds two new flavors called `updates-server` and `updates-workstation`, each containing job templates for appropriate post-install tests. Scheduler is expected to post `ADVISORY=(update ID) HDD_1=(base image) FLAVOR=updates-(server|workstation)`, where (base image) is one of the stable release base disk images produced by `createhdds` and usually used for upgrade testing. This will result in the appropriate job templates being loaded. We rejig postinstall test loading and static network config a bit so that this works for both the 'compose' and 'updates' test flows: we have to ensure we bring up networking for the tap tests before we try and install the updates, but still allow later adjustment of the configuration. We take advantage of the openQA feature that was added a few months back to run the same module multiple times, so the `_advisory_update` module can reboot after installing the updates and the modules that take care of bootloader, encryption and login get run again. This looks slightly wacky in the web UI, though - it doesn't show the later runs of each module. We also use the recently added feature to specify `+HDD_1` in the test suites which use a disk image uploaded by an earlier post-install test, so the test suite value will take priority over the value POSTed by the scheduler for those tests, and we will use the uploaded disk image (and not the clean base image POSTed by the scheduler) for those tests. My intent here is to enhance the scheduler, adding a consumer which listens out for critpath updates, and runs this test flow for each one, then reports the results to ResultsDB where Bodhi could query and display them. We could also add a list of other packages to have one or both sets of update tests run on it, I guess. Test Plan: Try a post something like: HDD_1=disk_f25_server_3_x86_64.img DISTRI=fedora VERSION=25 FLAVOR=updates-server ARCH=x86_64 BUILD=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c ADVISORY=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c CURRREL=25 PREVREL=24 Pick an appropriate `ADVISORY` (ideally, one containing some packages which might actually be involved in the tests), and matching `FLAVOR` and `HDD_1`. The appropriate tests should run, a repo with the update packages should be created and enabled (and dnf update run), and the tests should work properly. Also test a regular compose run to make sure I didn't break anything. Reviewers: jskladan, jsedlak Reviewed By: jsedlak Subscribers: tflink Differential Revision: https://phab.qa.fedoraproject.org/D1143
2017-01-25 16:16:12 +00:00
machine => { name => "64bit" },
prio => 40,
product => {
arch => "x86_64",
distri => "fedora",
flavor => "updates-server",
version => "*",
},
test_suite => { name => "server_cockpit_basic" },
},
{
Move update tests into a separate job group This makes them more visible in the web UI.
2017-03-02 05:10:41 +00:00
group_name => "Fedora Updates",
Add support for testing updates Summary: This adds an entirely new workflow for testing distribution updates. The `ADVISORY` variable is introduced: when set, `main.pm` will load an early post-install test that sets up a repository containing the packages from the specified update, runs `dnf -y update`, and reboots. A new templates file is added, `templates-updates`, which adds two new flavors called `updates-server` and `updates-workstation`, each containing job templates for appropriate post-install tests. Scheduler is expected to post `ADVISORY=(update ID) HDD_1=(base image) FLAVOR=updates-(server|workstation)`, where (base image) is one of the stable release base disk images produced by `createhdds` and usually used for upgrade testing. This will result in the appropriate job templates being loaded. We rejig postinstall test loading and static network config a bit so that this works for both the 'compose' and 'updates' test flows: we have to ensure we bring up networking for the tap tests before we try and install the updates, but still allow later adjustment of the configuration. We take advantage of the openQA feature that was added a few months back to run the same module multiple times, so the `_advisory_update` module can reboot after installing the updates and the modules that take care of bootloader, encryption and login get run again. This looks slightly wacky in the web UI, though - it doesn't show the later runs of each module. We also use the recently added feature to specify `+HDD_1` in the test suites which use a disk image uploaded by an earlier post-install test, so the test suite value will take priority over the value POSTed by the scheduler for those tests, and we will use the uploaded disk image (and not the clean base image POSTed by the scheduler) for those tests. My intent here is to enhance the scheduler, adding a consumer which listens out for critpath updates, and runs this test flow for each one, then reports the results to ResultsDB where Bodhi could query and display them. We could also add a list of other packages to have one or both sets of update tests run on it, I guess. Test Plan: Try a post something like: HDD_1=disk_f25_server_3_x86_64.img DISTRI=fedora VERSION=25 FLAVOR=updates-server ARCH=x86_64 BUILD=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c ADVISORY=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c CURRREL=25 PREVREL=24 Pick an appropriate `ADVISORY` (ideally, one containing some packages which might actually be involved in the tests), and matching `FLAVOR` and `HDD_1`. The appropriate tests should run, a repo with the update packages should be created and enabled (and dnf update run), and the tests should work properly. Also test a regular compose run to make sure I didn't break anything. Reviewers: jskladan, jsedlak Reviewed By: jsedlak Subscribers: tflink Differential Revision: https://phab.qa.fedoraproject.org/D1143
2017-01-25 16:16:12 +00:00
machine => { name => "64bit" },
prio => 40,
product => {
arch => "x86_64",
distri => "fedora",
flavor => "updates-server",
version => "*",
},
test_suite => { name => "realmd_join_cockpit" },
},
{
Move update tests into a separate job group This makes them more visible in the web UI.
2017-03-02 05:10:41 +00:00
group_name => "Fedora Updates",
Add support for testing updates Summary: This adds an entirely new workflow for testing distribution updates. The `ADVISORY` variable is introduced: when set, `main.pm` will load an early post-install test that sets up a repository containing the packages from the specified update, runs `dnf -y update`, and reboots. A new templates file is added, `templates-updates`, which adds two new flavors called `updates-server` and `updates-workstation`, each containing job templates for appropriate post-install tests. Scheduler is expected to post `ADVISORY=(update ID) HDD_1=(base image) FLAVOR=updates-(server|workstation)`, where (base image) is one of the stable release base disk images produced by `createhdds` and usually used for upgrade testing. This will result in the appropriate job templates being loaded. We rejig postinstall test loading and static network config a bit so that this works for both the 'compose' and 'updates' test flows: we have to ensure we bring up networking for the tap tests before we try and install the updates, but still allow later adjustment of the configuration. We take advantage of the openQA feature that was added a few months back to run the same module multiple times, so the `_advisory_update` module can reboot after installing the updates and the modules that take care of bootloader, encryption and login get run again. This looks slightly wacky in the web UI, though - it doesn't show the later runs of each module. We also use the recently added feature to specify `+HDD_1` in the test suites which use a disk image uploaded by an earlier post-install test, so the test suite value will take priority over the value POSTed by the scheduler for those tests, and we will use the uploaded disk image (and not the clean base image POSTed by the scheduler) for those tests. My intent here is to enhance the scheduler, adding a consumer which listens out for critpath updates, and runs this test flow for each one, then reports the results to ResultsDB where Bodhi could query and display them. We could also add a list of other packages to have one or both sets of update tests run on it, I guess. Test Plan: Try a post something like: HDD_1=disk_f25_server_3_x86_64.img DISTRI=fedora VERSION=25 FLAVOR=updates-server ARCH=x86_64 BUILD=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c ADVISORY=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c CURRREL=25 PREVREL=24 Pick an appropriate `ADVISORY` (ideally, one containing some packages which might actually be involved in the tests), and matching `FLAVOR` and `HDD_1`. The appropriate tests should run, a repo with the update packages should be created and enabled (and dnf update run), and the tests should work properly. Also test a regular compose run to make sure I didn't break anything. Reviewers: jskladan, jsedlak Reviewed By: jsedlak Subscribers: tflink Differential Revision: https://phab.qa.fedoraproject.org/D1143
2017-01-25 16:16:12 +00:00
machine => { name => "64bit" },
prio => 30,
product => {
arch => "x86_64",
distri => "fedora",
flavor => "updates-server",
version => "*",
},
test_suite => { name => "realmd_join_sssd" },
},
Test FreeIPA upgrade on updates This adds the FreeIPA server and client upgrade tests to a new updates-server-upgrade flavor which fedora_openqa will schedule for updates. This way, we can test whether updates break FreeIPA upgrades, which is a request the FreeIPA team made to me. This has been deployed on staging for the last week or so and appears to work fine. Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
2018-04-20 17:12:01 +00:00
{
group_name => "Fedora Updates",
machine => { name => "64bit" },
prio => 40,
product => {
arch => "x86_64",
distri => "fedora",
flavor => "updates-server-upgrade",
version => "*",
},
test_suite => { name => "upgrade_server_domain_controller" },
},
{
group_name => "Fedora Updates",
machine => { name => "64bit" },
prio => 30,
product => {
arch => "x86_64",
distri => "fedora",
flavor => "updates-server-upgrade",
version => "*",
},
test_suite => { name => "upgrade_realmd_client" },
},
Add support for testing updates Summary: This adds an entirely new workflow for testing distribution updates. The `ADVISORY` variable is introduced: when set, `main.pm` will load an early post-install test that sets up a repository containing the packages from the specified update, runs `dnf -y update`, and reboots. A new templates file is added, `templates-updates`, which adds two new flavors called `updates-server` and `updates-workstation`, each containing job templates for appropriate post-install tests. Scheduler is expected to post `ADVISORY=(update ID) HDD_1=(base image) FLAVOR=updates-(server|workstation)`, where (base image) is one of the stable release base disk images produced by `createhdds` and usually used for upgrade testing. This will result in the appropriate job templates being loaded. We rejig postinstall test loading and static network config a bit so that this works for both the 'compose' and 'updates' test flows: we have to ensure we bring up networking for the tap tests before we try and install the updates, but still allow later adjustment of the configuration. We take advantage of the openQA feature that was added a few months back to run the same module multiple times, so the `_advisory_update` module can reboot after installing the updates and the modules that take care of bootloader, encryption and login get run again. This looks slightly wacky in the web UI, though - it doesn't show the later runs of each module. We also use the recently added feature to specify `+HDD_1` in the test suites which use a disk image uploaded by an earlier post-install test, so the test suite value will take priority over the value POSTed by the scheduler for those tests, and we will use the uploaded disk image (and not the clean base image POSTed by the scheduler) for those tests. My intent here is to enhance the scheduler, adding a consumer which listens out for critpath updates, and runs this test flow for each one, then reports the results to ResultsDB where Bodhi could query and display them. We could also add a list of other packages to have one or both sets of update tests run on it, I guess. Test Plan: Try a post something like: HDD_1=disk_f25_server_3_x86_64.img DISTRI=fedora VERSION=25 FLAVOR=updates-server ARCH=x86_64 BUILD=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c ADVISORY=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c CURRREL=25 PREVREL=24 Pick an appropriate `ADVISORY` (ideally, one containing some packages which might actually be involved in the tests), and matching `FLAVOR` and `HDD_1`. The appropriate tests should run, a repo with the update packages should be created and enabled (and dnf update run), and the tests should work properly. Also test a regular compose run to make sure I didn't break anything. Reviewers: jskladan, jsedlak Reviewed By: jsedlak Subscribers: tflink Differential Revision: https://phab.qa.fedoraproject.org/D1143
2017-01-25 16:16:12 +00:00
{
Move update tests into a separate job group This makes them more visible in the web UI.
2017-03-02 05:10:41 +00:00
group_name => "Fedora Updates",
Add support for testing updates Summary: This adds an entirely new workflow for testing distribution updates. The `ADVISORY` variable is introduced: when set, `main.pm` will load an early post-install test that sets up a repository containing the packages from the specified update, runs `dnf -y update`, and reboots. A new templates file is added, `templates-updates`, which adds two new flavors called `updates-server` and `updates-workstation`, each containing job templates for appropriate post-install tests. Scheduler is expected to post `ADVISORY=(update ID) HDD_1=(base image) FLAVOR=updates-(server|workstation)`, where (base image) is one of the stable release base disk images produced by `createhdds` and usually used for upgrade testing. This will result in the appropriate job templates being loaded. We rejig postinstall test loading and static network config a bit so that this works for both the 'compose' and 'updates' test flows: we have to ensure we bring up networking for the tap tests before we try and install the updates, but still allow later adjustment of the configuration. We take advantage of the openQA feature that was added a few months back to run the same module multiple times, so the `_advisory_update` module can reboot after installing the updates and the modules that take care of bootloader, encryption and login get run again. This looks slightly wacky in the web UI, though - it doesn't show the later runs of each module. We also use the recently added feature to specify `+HDD_1` in the test suites which use a disk image uploaded by an earlier post-install test, so the test suite value will take priority over the value POSTed by the scheduler for those tests, and we will use the uploaded disk image (and not the clean base image POSTed by the scheduler) for those tests. My intent here is to enhance the scheduler, adding a consumer which listens out for critpath updates, and runs this test flow for each one, then reports the results to ResultsDB where Bodhi could query and display them. We could also add a list of other packages to have one or both sets of update tests run on it, I guess. Test Plan: Try a post something like: HDD_1=disk_f25_server_3_x86_64.img DISTRI=fedora VERSION=25 FLAVOR=updates-server ARCH=x86_64 BUILD=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c ADVISORY=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c CURRREL=25 PREVREL=24 Pick an appropriate `ADVISORY` (ideally, one containing some packages which might actually be involved in the tests), and matching `FLAVOR` and `HDD_1`. The appropriate tests should run, a repo with the update packages should be created and enabled (and dnf update run), and the tests should work properly. Also test a regular compose run to make sure I didn't break anything. Reviewers: jskladan, jsedlak Reviewed By: jsedlak Subscribers: tflink Differential Revision: https://phab.qa.fedoraproject.org/D1143
2017-01-25 16:16:12 +00:00
machine => { name => "64bit" },
prio => 40,
product => {
arch => "x86_64",
distri => "fedora",
flavor => "updates-server",
version => "*",
},
test_suite => { name => "server_role_deploy_database_server" },
},
{
Move update tests into a separate job group This makes them more visible in the web UI.
2017-03-02 05:10:41 +00:00
group_name => "Fedora Updates",
Add support for testing updates Summary: This adds an entirely new workflow for testing distribution updates. The `ADVISORY` variable is introduced: when set, `main.pm` will load an early post-install test that sets up a repository containing the packages from the specified update, runs `dnf -y update`, and reboots. A new templates file is added, `templates-updates`, which adds two new flavors called `updates-server` and `updates-workstation`, each containing job templates for appropriate post-install tests. Scheduler is expected to post `ADVISORY=(update ID) HDD_1=(base image) FLAVOR=updates-(server|workstation)`, where (base image) is one of the stable release base disk images produced by `createhdds` and usually used for upgrade testing. This will result in the appropriate job templates being loaded. We rejig postinstall test loading and static network config a bit so that this works for both the 'compose' and 'updates' test flows: we have to ensure we bring up networking for the tap tests before we try and install the updates, but still allow later adjustment of the configuration. We take advantage of the openQA feature that was added a few months back to run the same module multiple times, so the `_advisory_update` module can reboot after installing the updates and the modules that take care of bootloader, encryption and login get run again. This looks slightly wacky in the web UI, though - it doesn't show the later runs of each module. We also use the recently added feature to specify `+HDD_1` in the test suites which use a disk image uploaded by an earlier post-install test, so the test suite value will take priority over the value POSTed by the scheduler for those tests, and we will use the uploaded disk image (and not the clean base image POSTed by the scheduler) for those tests. My intent here is to enhance the scheduler, adding a consumer which listens out for critpath updates, and runs this test flow for each one, then reports the results to ResultsDB where Bodhi could query and display them. We could also add a list of other packages to have one or both sets of update tests run on it, I guess. Test Plan: Try a post something like: HDD_1=disk_f25_server_3_x86_64.img DISTRI=fedora VERSION=25 FLAVOR=updates-server ARCH=x86_64 BUILD=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c ADVISORY=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c CURRREL=25 PREVREL=24 Pick an appropriate `ADVISORY` (ideally, one containing some packages which might actually be involved in the tests), and matching `FLAVOR` and `HDD_1`. The appropriate tests should run, a repo with the update packages should be created and enabled (and dnf update run), and the tests should work properly. Also test a regular compose run to make sure I didn't break anything. Reviewers: jskladan, jsedlak Reviewed By: jsedlak Subscribers: tflink Differential Revision: https://phab.qa.fedoraproject.org/D1143
2017-01-25 16:16:12 +00:00
machine => { name => "64bit" },
prio => 40,
product => {
arch => "x86_64",
distri => "fedora",
flavor => "updates-server",
version => "*",
},
test_suite => { name => "server_database_client" },
},
{
Move update tests into a separate job group This makes them more visible in the web UI.
2017-03-02 05:10:41 +00:00
group_name => "Fedora Updates",
Add support for testing updates Summary: This adds an entirely new workflow for testing distribution updates. The `ADVISORY` variable is introduced: when set, `main.pm` will load an early post-install test that sets up a repository containing the packages from the specified update, runs `dnf -y update`, and reboots. A new templates file is added, `templates-updates`, which adds two new flavors called `updates-server` and `updates-workstation`, each containing job templates for appropriate post-install tests. Scheduler is expected to post `ADVISORY=(update ID) HDD_1=(base image) FLAVOR=updates-(server|workstation)`, where (base image) is one of the stable release base disk images produced by `createhdds` and usually used for upgrade testing. This will result in the appropriate job templates being loaded. We rejig postinstall test loading and static network config a bit so that this works for both the 'compose' and 'updates' test flows: we have to ensure we bring up networking for the tap tests before we try and install the updates, but still allow later adjustment of the configuration. We take advantage of the openQA feature that was added a few months back to run the same module multiple times, so the `_advisory_update` module can reboot after installing the updates and the modules that take care of bootloader, encryption and login get run again. This looks slightly wacky in the web UI, though - it doesn't show the later runs of each module. We also use the recently added feature to specify `+HDD_1` in the test suites which use a disk image uploaded by an earlier post-install test, so the test suite value will take priority over the value POSTed by the scheduler for those tests, and we will use the uploaded disk image (and not the clean base image POSTed by the scheduler) for those tests. My intent here is to enhance the scheduler, adding a consumer which listens out for critpath updates, and runs this test flow for each one, then reports the results to ResultsDB where Bodhi could query and display them. We could also add a list of other packages to have one or both sets of update tests run on it, I guess. Test Plan: Try a post something like: HDD_1=disk_f25_server_3_x86_64.img DISTRI=fedora VERSION=25 FLAVOR=updates-server ARCH=x86_64 BUILD=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c ADVISORY=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c CURRREL=25 PREVREL=24 Pick an appropriate `ADVISORY` (ideally, one containing some packages which might actually be involved in the tests), and matching `FLAVOR` and `HDD_1`. The appropriate tests should run, a repo with the update packages should be created and enabled (and dnf update run), and the tests should work properly. Also test a regular compose run to make sure I didn't break anything. Reviewers: jskladan, jsedlak Reviewed By: jsedlak Subscribers: tflink Differential Revision: https://phab.qa.fedoraproject.org/D1143
2017-01-25 16:16:12 +00:00
machine => { name => "64bit" },
prio => 40,
product => {
arch => "x86_64",
distri => "fedora",
flavor => "updates-server",
version => "*",
},
test_suite => { name => "server_firewall_default" },
},
Add a test of bootchain stuff for updates This adds a new test intended to just check boot chain things for updates. It doesn't run any test modules besides the stock update ones, but sets a variable, ADVISORY_BOOT_TEST, which causes _advisory_update to do some additional stuff after installing the updates but before rebooting: it forces regen of the initramfs and bootloader config, and reinstalls the bootloader on BIOS (not UEFI as it's not relevant). If the following boot fails, we probably have a bug somewhere. Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
2018-10-04 22:19:43 +00:00
{
group_name => "Fedora Updates",
machine => { name => "64bit" },
prio => 40,
product => {
arch => "x86_64",
distri => "fedora",
flavor => "updates-server",
version => "*",
},
test_suite => { name => "advisory_boot" },
},
{
group_name => "Fedora Updates",
machine => { name => "uefi" },
prio => 40,
product => {
arch => "x86_64",
distri => "fedora",
flavor => "updates-server",
version => "*",
},
test_suite => { name => "advisory_boot" },
},
Add "Fedora PowerPC Updates" group and related server tests in templates-updates file Only support "updates-server" flavor do not support "updates-workstation" neither "updates-kde" Signed-off-by: Michel Normand <normand@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2017-08-17 08:24:42 +00:00
{
group_name => "Fedora PowerPC Updates",
machine => { name => "ppc64le" },
prio => 40,
product => {
arch => "ppc64le",
distri => "fedora",
flavor => "updates-server",
version => "*",
},
test_suite => { name => "base_selinux" },
},
{
group_name => "Fedora PowerPC Updates",
machine => { name => "ppc64le" },
prio => 40,
product => {
arch => "ppc64le",
distri => "fedora",
flavor => "updates-server",
version => "*",
},
test_suite => { name => "base_services_start" },
},
{
group_name => "Fedora PowerPC Updates",
machine => { name => "ppc64le" },
prio => 40,
product => {
arch => "ppc64le",
distri => "fedora",
flavor => "updates-server",
version => "*",
},
test_suite => { name => "base_service_manipulation" },
},
{
group_name => "Fedora PowerPC Updates",
machine => { name => "ppc64le" },
prio => 40,
product => {
arch => "ppc64le",
distri => "fedora",
flavor => "updates-server",
version => "*",
},
test_suite => { name => "base_update_cli" },
},
{
group_name => "Fedora PowerPC Updates",
machine => { name => "ppc64le" },
prio => 40,
product => {
arch => "ppc64le",
distri => "fedora",
flavor => "updates-server",
version => "*",
},
test_suite => { name => "server_role_deploy_domain_controller" },
},
{
group_name => "Fedora PowerPC Updates",
machine => { name => "ppc64le" },
prio => 40,
product => {
arch => "ppc64le",
distri => "fedora",
flavor => "updates-server",
version => "*",
},
test_suite => { name => "server_cockpit_default" },
},
{
group_name => "Fedora PowerPC Updates",
machine => { name => "ppc64le" },
prio => 40,
product => {
arch => "ppc64le",
distri => "fedora",
flavor => "updates-server",
version => "*",
},
test_suite => { name => "server_cockpit_basic" },
},
{
group_name => "Fedora PowerPC Updates",
machine => { name => "ppc64le" },
prio => 40,
product => {
arch => "ppc64le",
distri => "fedora",
flavor => "updates-server",
version => "*",
},
test_suite => { name => "realmd_join_cockpit" },
},
{
group_name => "Fedora PowerPC Updates",
machine => { name => "ppc64le" },
prio => 30,
product => {
arch => "ppc64le",
distri => "fedora",
flavor => "updates-server",
version => "*",
},
test_suite => { name => "realmd_join_sssd" },
},
{
group_name => "Fedora PowerPC Updates",
machine => { name => "ppc64le" },
prio => 40,
product => {
arch => "ppc64le",
distri => "fedora",
flavor => "updates-server",
version => "*",
},
test_suite => { name => "server_role_deploy_database_server" },
},
{
group_name => "Fedora PowerPC Updates",
machine => { name => "ppc64le" },
prio => 40,
product => {
arch => "ppc64le",
distri => "fedora",
flavor => "updates-server",
version => "*",
},
test_suite => { name => "server_database_client" },
},
{
group_name => "Fedora PowerPC Updates",
machine => { name => "ppc64le" },
prio => 40,
product => {
arch => "ppc64le",
distri => "fedora",
flavor => "updates-server",
version => "*",
},
test_suite => { name => "server_firewall_default" },
},
{
group_name => "Fedora PowerPC Updates",
machine => { name => "ppc64" },
prio => 40,
product => {
arch => "ppc64",
distri => "fedora",
flavor => "updates-server",
version => "*",
},
test_suite => { name => "base_selinux" },
},
{
group_name => "Fedora PowerPC Updates",
machine => { name => "ppc64" },
prio => 40,
product => {
arch => "ppc64",
distri => "fedora",
flavor => "updates-server",
version => "*",
},
test_suite => { name => "base_services_start" },
},
{
group_name => "Fedora PowerPC Updates",
machine => { name => "ppc64" },
prio => 40,
product => {
arch => "ppc64",
distri => "fedora",
flavor => "updates-server",
version => "*",
},
test_suite => { name => "base_service_manipulation" },
},
{
group_name => "Fedora PowerPC Updates",
machine => { name => "ppc64" },
prio => 40,
product => {
arch => "ppc64",
distri => "fedora",
flavor => "updates-server",
version => "*",
},
test_suite => { name => "base_update_cli" },
},
{
group_name => "Fedora PowerPC Updates",
machine => { name => "ppc64" },
prio => 40,
product => {
arch => "ppc64",
distri => "fedora",
flavor => "updates-server",
version => "*",
},
test_suite => { name => "server_role_deploy_domain_controller" },
},
{
group_name => "Fedora PowerPC Updates",
machine => { name => "ppc64" },
prio => 40,
product => {
arch => "ppc64",
distri => "fedora",
flavor => "updates-server",
version => "*",
},
test_suite => { name => "server_cockpit_default" },
},
{
group_name => "Fedora PowerPC Updates",
machine => { name => "ppc64" },
prio => 40,
product => {
arch => "ppc64",
distri => "fedora",
flavor => "updates-server",
version => "*",
},
test_suite => { name => "server_cockpit_basic" },
},
{
group_name => "Fedora PowerPC Updates",
machine => { name => "ppc64" },
prio => 40,
product => {
arch => "ppc64",
distri => "fedora",
flavor => "updates-server",
version => "*",
},
test_suite => { name => "realmd_join_cockpit" },
},
{
group_name => "Fedora PowerPC Updates",
machine => { name => "ppc64" },
prio => 30,
product => {
arch => "ppc64",
distri => "fedora",
flavor => "updates-server",
version => "*",
},
test_suite => { name => "realmd_join_sssd" },
},
{
group_name => "Fedora PowerPC Updates",
machine => { name => "ppc64" },
prio => 40,
product => {
arch => "ppc64",
distri => "fedora",
flavor => "updates-server",
version => "*",
},
test_suite => { name => "server_role_deploy_database_server" },
},
{
group_name => "Fedora PowerPC Updates",
machine => { name => "ppc64" },
prio => 40,
product => {
arch => "ppc64",
distri => "fedora",
flavor => "updates-server",
version => "*",
},
test_suite => { name => "server_database_client" },
},
{
group_name => "Fedora PowerPC Updates",
machine => { name => "ppc64" },
prio => 40,
product => {
arch => "ppc64",
distri => "fedora",
flavor => "updates-server",
version => "*",
},
test_suite => { name => "server_firewall_default" },
},
Add a test of bootchain stuff for updates This adds a new test intended to just check boot chain things for updates. It doesn't run any test modules besides the stock update ones, but sets a variable, ADVISORY_BOOT_TEST, which causes _advisory_update to do some additional stuff after installing the updates but before rebooting: it forces regen of the initramfs and bootloader config, and reinstalls the bootloader on BIOS (not UEFI as it's not relevant). If the following boot fails, we probably have a bug somewhere. Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
2018-10-04 22:19:43 +00:00
{
group_name => "Fedora PowerPC Updates",
machine => { name => "ppc64" },
prio => 40,
product => {
arch => "ppc64",
distri => "fedora",
flavor => "updates-server",
version => "*",
},
test_suite => { name => "advisory_boot" },
},
Fix a stray use of tabs in templates-updates EVIL EVIL TABS Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
2018-10-04 23:44:15 +00:00
{
Add aarch64 to templates-updates
2018-03-07 03:05:04 +00:00
group_name => "Fedora AArch64 Updates",
machine => { name => "aarch64" },
prio => 40,
product => {
arch => "aarch64",
distri => "fedora",
flavor => "updates-server",
version => "*",
},
test_suite => { name => "base_selinux" },
},
{
group_name => "Fedora AArch64 Updates",
machine => { name => "aarch64" },
prio => 40,
product => {
arch => "aarch64",
distri => "fedora",
flavor => "updates-server",
version => "*",
},
test_suite => { name => "base_services_start" },
},
{
group_name => "Fedora AArch64 Updates",
machine => { name => "aarch64" },
prio => 40,
product => {
arch => "aarch64",
distri => "fedora",
flavor => "updates-server",
version => "*",
},
test_suite => { name => "base_service_manipulation" },
},
{
group_name => "Fedora AArch64 Updates",
machine => { name => "aarch64" },
prio => 40,
product => {
arch => "aarch64",
distri => "fedora",
flavor => "updates-server",
version => "*",
},
test_suite => { name => "base_update_cli" },
},
{
group_name => "Fedora AArch64 Updates",
machine => { name => "aarch64" },
prio => 40,
product => {
arch => "aarch64",
distri => "fedora",
flavor => "updates-server",
version => "*",
},
test_suite => { name => "server_role_deploy_domain_controller" },
},
{
group_name => "Fedora AArch64 Updates",
machine => { name => "aarch64" },
prio => 40,
product => {
arch => "aarch64",
distri => "fedora",
flavor => "updates-server",
version => "*",
},
test_suite => { name => "server_cockpit_default" },
},
{
group_name => "Fedora AArch64 Updates",
machine => { name => "aarch64" },
prio => 40,
product => {
arch => "aarch64",
distri => "fedora",
flavor => "updates-server",
version => "*",
},
test_suite => { name => "server_cockpit_basic" },
},
{
group_name => "Fedora AArch64 Updates",
machine => { name => "aarch64" },
prio => 40,
product => {
arch => "aarch64",
distri => "fedora",
flavor => "updates-server",
version => "*",
},
test_suite => { name => "realmd_join_cockpit" },
},
{
group_name => "Fedora AArch64 Updates",
machine => { name => "aarch64" },
prio => 30,
product => {
arch => "aarch64",
distri => "fedora",
flavor => "updates-server",
version => "*",
},
test_suite => { name => "realmd_join_sssd" },
},
{
group_name => "Fedora AArch64 Updates",
machine => { name => "aarch64" },
prio => 40,
product => {
arch => "aarch64",
distri => "fedora",
flavor => "updates-server",
version => "*",
},
test_suite => { name => "server_role_deploy_database_server" },
},
{
group_name => "Fedora AArch64 Updates",
machine => { name => "aarch64" },
prio => 40,
product => {
arch => "aarch64",
distri => "fedora",
flavor => "updates-server",
version => "*",
},
test_suite => { name => "server_database_client" },
},
{
group_name => "Fedora AArch64 Updates",
machine => { name => "aarch64" },
prio => 40,
product => {
arch => "aarch64",
distri => "fedora",
flavor => "updates-server",
version => "*",
},
test_suite => { name => "server_firewall_default" },
},
Add a test of bootchain stuff for updates This adds a new test intended to just check boot chain things for updates. It doesn't run any test modules besides the stock update ones, but sets a variable, ADVISORY_BOOT_TEST, which causes _advisory_update to do some additional stuff after installing the updates but before rebooting: it forces regen of the initramfs and bootloader config, and reinstalls the bootloader on BIOS (not UEFI as it's not relevant). If the following boot fails, we probably have a bug somewhere. Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
2018-10-04 22:19:43 +00:00
{
group_name => "Fedora AArch64 Updates",
machine => { name => "aarch64" },
prio => 40,
product => {
arch => "aarch64",
distri => "fedora",
flavor => "updates-server",
version => "*",
},
test_suite => { name => "advisory_boot" },
},
Add support for testing updates Summary: This adds an entirely new workflow for testing distribution updates. The `ADVISORY` variable is introduced: when set, `main.pm` will load an early post-install test that sets up a repository containing the packages from the specified update, runs `dnf -y update`, and reboots. A new templates file is added, `templates-updates`, which adds two new flavors called `updates-server` and `updates-workstation`, each containing job templates for appropriate post-install tests. Scheduler is expected to post `ADVISORY=(update ID) HDD_1=(base image) FLAVOR=updates-(server|workstation)`, where (base image) is one of the stable release base disk images produced by `createhdds` and usually used for upgrade testing. This will result in the appropriate job templates being loaded. We rejig postinstall test loading and static network config a bit so that this works for both the 'compose' and 'updates' test flows: we have to ensure we bring up networking for the tap tests before we try and install the updates, but still allow later adjustment of the configuration. We take advantage of the openQA feature that was added a few months back to run the same module multiple times, so the `_advisory_update` module can reboot after installing the updates and the modules that take care of bootloader, encryption and login get run again. This looks slightly wacky in the web UI, though - it doesn't show the later runs of each module. We also use the recently added feature to specify `+HDD_1` in the test suites which use a disk image uploaded by an earlier post-install test, so the test suite value will take priority over the value POSTed by the scheduler for those tests, and we will use the uploaded disk image (and not the clean base image POSTed by the scheduler) for those tests. My intent here is to enhance the scheduler, adding a consumer which listens out for critpath updates, and runs this test flow for each one, then reports the results to ResultsDB where Bodhi could query and display them. We could also add a list of other packages to have one or both sets of update tests run on it, I guess. Test Plan: Try a post something like: HDD_1=disk_f25_server_3_x86_64.img DISTRI=fedora VERSION=25 FLAVOR=updates-server ARCH=x86_64 BUILD=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c ADVISORY=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c CURRREL=25 PREVREL=24 Pick an appropriate `ADVISORY` (ideally, one containing some packages which might actually be involved in the tests), and matching `FLAVOR` and `HDD_1`. The appropriate tests should run, a repo with the update packages should be created and enabled (and dnf update run), and the tests should work properly. Also test a regular compose run to make sure I didn't break anything. Reviewers: jskladan, jsedlak Reviewed By: jsedlak Subscribers: tflink Differential Revision: https://phab.qa.fedoraproject.org/D1143
2017-01-25 16:16:12 +00:00
],
Products => [
{
arch => "x86_64",
distri => "fedora",
flavor => "updates-workstation",
name => "",
settings => [
{ key => "DESKTOP", value => "gnome" },
],
version => "*",
},
Add Workstation upgrade test to update tests Since we set up this whole process to run upgrade tests for updates to run the FreeIPA ones on the Server base image, it should be easy to also run Workstation upgrade tests on the Workstation base image. So let's do that! Let's do the most complex test only, the encrypted upgrade one. Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
2018-04-27 23:46:56 +00:00
{
arch => "x86_64",
distri => "fedora",
flavor => "updates-workstation-upgrade",
name => "",
settings => [
{ key => "DESKTOP", value => "gnome" },
],
version => "*",
},
Add support for testing updates Summary: This adds an entirely new workflow for testing distribution updates. The `ADVISORY` variable is introduced: when set, `main.pm` will load an early post-install test that sets up a repository containing the packages from the specified update, runs `dnf -y update`, and reboots. A new templates file is added, `templates-updates`, which adds two new flavors called `updates-server` and `updates-workstation`, each containing job templates for appropriate post-install tests. Scheduler is expected to post `ADVISORY=(update ID) HDD_1=(base image) FLAVOR=updates-(server|workstation)`, where (base image) is one of the stable release base disk images produced by `createhdds` and usually used for upgrade testing. This will result in the appropriate job templates being loaded. We rejig postinstall test loading and static network config a bit so that this works for both the 'compose' and 'updates' test flows: we have to ensure we bring up networking for the tap tests before we try and install the updates, but still allow later adjustment of the configuration. We take advantage of the openQA feature that was added a few months back to run the same module multiple times, so the `_advisory_update` module can reboot after installing the updates and the modules that take care of bootloader, encryption and login get run again. This looks slightly wacky in the web UI, though - it doesn't show the later runs of each module. We also use the recently added feature to specify `+HDD_1` in the test suites which use a disk image uploaded by an earlier post-install test, so the test suite value will take priority over the value POSTed by the scheduler for those tests, and we will use the uploaded disk image (and not the clean base image POSTed by the scheduler) for those tests. My intent here is to enhance the scheduler, adding a consumer which listens out for critpath updates, and runs this test flow for each one, then reports the results to ResultsDB where Bodhi could query and display them. We could also add a list of other packages to have one or both sets of update tests run on it, I guess. Test Plan: Try a post something like: HDD_1=disk_f25_server_3_x86_64.img DISTRI=fedora VERSION=25 FLAVOR=updates-server ARCH=x86_64 BUILD=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c ADVISORY=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c CURRREL=25 PREVREL=24 Pick an appropriate `ADVISORY` (ideally, one containing some packages which might actually be involved in the tests), and matching `FLAVOR` and `HDD_1`. The appropriate tests should run, a repo with the update packages should be created and enabled (and dnf update run), and the tests should work properly. Also test a regular compose run to make sure I didn't break anything. Reviewers: jskladan, jsedlak Reviewed By: jsedlak Subscribers: tflink Differential Revision: https://phab.qa.fedoraproject.org/D1143
2017-01-25 16:16:12 +00:00
{
arch => "x86_64",
distri => "fedora",
flavor => "updates-kde",
name => "",
settings => [
{ key => "DESKTOP", value => "kde" }
],
version => "*",
},
{
arch => "x86_64",
distri => "fedora",
flavor => "updates-server",
name => "",
settings => [
],
version => "*",
},
Test FreeIPA upgrade on updates This adds the FreeIPA server and client upgrade tests to a new updates-server-upgrade flavor which fedora_openqa will schedule for updates. This way, we can test whether updates break FreeIPA upgrades, which is a request the FreeIPA team made to me. This has been deployed on staging for the last week or so and appears to work fine. Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
2018-04-20 17:12:01 +00:00
{
arch => "x86_64",
distri => "fedora",
flavor => "updates-server-upgrade",
name => "",
settings => [
],
version => "*",
},
Add "Fedora PowerPC Updates" group and related server tests in templates-updates file Only support "updates-server" flavor do not support "updates-workstation" neither "updates-kde" Signed-off-by: Michel Normand <normand@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2017-08-17 08:24:42 +00:00
{
arch => "ppc64le",
distri => "fedora",
flavor => "updates-server",
name => "",
settings => [
],
version => "*",
},
Test FreeIPA upgrade on updates This adds the FreeIPA server and client upgrade tests to a new updates-server-upgrade flavor which fedora_openqa will schedule for updates. This way, we can test whether updates break FreeIPA upgrades, which is a request the FreeIPA team made to me. This has been deployed on staging for the last week or so and appears to work fine. Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
2018-04-20 17:12:01 +00:00
{
arch => "ppc64le",
distri => "fedora",
flavor => "updates-server-upgrade",
name => "",
settings => [
],
version => "*",
},
Add "Fedora PowerPC Updates" group and related server tests in templates-updates file Only support "updates-server" flavor do not support "updates-workstation" neither "updates-kde" Signed-off-by: Michel Normand <normand@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2017-08-17 08:24:42 +00:00
{
arch => "ppc64",
distri => "fedora",
flavor => "updates-server",
name => "",
settings => [
],
version => "*",
},
Test FreeIPA upgrade on updates This adds the FreeIPA server and client upgrade tests to a new updates-server-upgrade flavor which fedora_openqa will schedule for updates. This way, we can test whether updates break FreeIPA upgrades, which is a request the FreeIPA team made to me. This has been deployed on staging for the last week or so and appears to work fine. Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
2018-04-20 17:12:01 +00:00
{
arch => "ppc64",
distri => "fedora",
flavor => "updates-server-upgrade",
name => "",
settings => [
],
version => "*",
},
{
Add aarch64 to templates-updates
2018-03-07 03:05:04 +00:00
arch => "aarch64",
distri => "fedora",
flavor => "updates-server",
name => "",
settings => [
],
version => "*",
},
Test FreeIPA upgrade on updates This adds the FreeIPA server and client upgrade tests to a new updates-server-upgrade flavor which fedora_openqa will schedule for updates. This way, we can test whether updates break FreeIPA upgrades, which is a request the FreeIPA team made to me. This has been deployed on staging for the last week or so and appears to work fine. Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
2018-04-20 17:12:01 +00:00
{
arch => "aarch64",
distri => "fedora",
flavor => "updates-server-upgrade",
name => "",
settings => [
],
version => "*",
},
Add support for testing updates Summary: This adds an entirely new workflow for testing distribution updates. The `ADVISORY` variable is introduced: when set, `main.pm` will load an early post-install test that sets up a repository containing the packages from the specified update, runs `dnf -y update`, and reboots. A new templates file is added, `templates-updates`, which adds two new flavors called `updates-server` and `updates-workstation`, each containing job templates for appropriate post-install tests. Scheduler is expected to post `ADVISORY=(update ID) HDD_1=(base image) FLAVOR=updates-(server|workstation)`, where (base image) is one of the stable release base disk images produced by `createhdds` and usually used for upgrade testing. This will result in the appropriate job templates being loaded. We rejig postinstall test loading and static network config a bit so that this works for both the 'compose' and 'updates' test flows: we have to ensure we bring up networking for the tap tests before we try and install the updates, but still allow later adjustment of the configuration. We take advantage of the openQA feature that was added a few months back to run the same module multiple times, so the `_advisory_update` module can reboot after installing the updates and the modules that take care of bootloader, encryption and login get run again. This looks slightly wacky in the web UI, though - it doesn't show the later runs of each module. We also use the recently added feature to specify `+HDD_1` in the test suites which use a disk image uploaded by an earlier post-install test, so the test suite value will take priority over the value POSTed by the scheduler for those tests, and we will use the uploaded disk image (and not the clean base image POSTed by the scheduler) for those tests. My intent here is to enhance the scheduler, adding a consumer which listens out for critpath updates, and runs this test flow for each one, then reports the results to ResultsDB where Bodhi could query and display them. We could also add a list of other packages to have one or both sets of update tests run on it, I guess. Test Plan: Try a post something like: HDD_1=disk_f25_server_3_x86_64.img DISTRI=fedora VERSION=25 FLAVOR=updates-server ARCH=x86_64 BUILD=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c ADVISORY=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c CURRREL=25 PREVREL=24 Pick an appropriate `ADVISORY` (ideally, one containing some packages which might actually be involved in the tests), and matching `FLAVOR` and `HDD_1`. The appropriate tests should run, a repo with the update packages should be created and enabled (and dnf update run), and the tests should work properly. Also test a regular compose run to make sure I didn't break anything. Reviewers: jskladan, jsedlak Reviewed By: jsedlak Subscribers: tflink Differential Revision: https://phab.qa.fedoraproject.org/D1143
2017-01-25 16:16:12 +00:00
],
Add a test of bootchain stuff for updates This adds a new test intended to just check boot chain things for updates. It doesn't run any test modules besides the stock update ones, but sets a variable, ADVISORY_BOOT_TEST, which causes _advisory_update to do some additional stuff after installing the updates but before rebooting: it forces regen of the initramfs and bootloader config, and reinstalls the bootloader on BIOS (not UEFI as it's not relevant). If the following boot fails, we probably have a bug somewhere. Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
2018-10-04 22:19:43 +00:00
TestSuites => [
{
name => "advisory_boot",
settings => [
{ key => "USER_LOGIN", value => "false" },
{ key => "ROOT_PASSWORD", value => "weakpassword" },
{ key => "BOOTFROM", value => "c" },
{ key => "ADVISORY_BOOT_TEST", value => "1" },
],
},
],
Add support for testing updates Summary: This adds an entirely new workflow for testing distribution updates. The `ADVISORY` variable is introduced: when set, `main.pm` will load an early post-install test that sets up a repository containing the packages from the specified update, runs `dnf -y update`, and reboots. A new templates file is added, `templates-updates`, which adds two new flavors called `updates-server` and `updates-workstation`, each containing job templates for appropriate post-install tests. Scheduler is expected to post `ADVISORY=(update ID) HDD_1=(base image) FLAVOR=updates-(server|workstation)`, where (base image) is one of the stable release base disk images produced by `createhdds` and usually used for upgrade testing. This will result in the appropriate job templates being loaded. We rejig postinstall test loading and static network config a bit so that this works for both the 'compose' and 'updates' test flows: we have to ensure we bring up networking for the tap tests before we try and install the updates, but still allow later adjustment of the configuration. We take advantage of the openQA feature that was added a few months back to run the same module multiple times, so the `_advisory_update` module can reboot after installing the updates and the modules that take care of bootloader, encryption and login get run again. This looks slightly wacky in the web UI, though - it doesn't show the later runs of each module. We also use the recently added feature to specify `+HDD_1` in the test suites which use a disk image uploaded by an earlier post-install test, so the test suite value will take priority over the value POSTed by the scheduler for those tests, and we will use the uploaded disk image (and not the clean base image POSTed by the scheduler) for those tests. My intent here is to enhance the scheduler, adding a consumer which listens out for critpath updates, and runs this test flow for each one, then reports the results to ResultsDB where Bodhi could query and display them. We could also add a list of other packages to have one or both sets of update tests run on it, I guess. Test Plan: Try a post something like: HDD_1=disk_f25_server_3_x86_64.img DISTRI=fedora VERSION=25 FLAVOR=updates-server ARCH=x86_64 BUILD=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c ADVISORY=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c CURRREL=25 PREVREL=24 Pick an appropriate `ADVISORY` (ideally, one containing some packages which might actually be involved in the tests), and matching `FLAVOR` and `HDD_1`. The appropriate tests should run, a repo with the update packages should be created and enabled (and dnf update run), and the tests should work properly. Also test a regular compose run to make sure I didn't break anything. Reviewers: jskladan, jsedlak Reviewed By: jsedlak Subscribers: tflink Differential Revision: https://phab.qa.fedoraproject.org/D1143
2017-01-25 16:16:12 +00:00
}
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink