We're not seeing *exactly* #1314991 any more, but we're seeing
something that looks quite similar: the first attempt to find
updates just doesn't find any. No error message, no updates. I
have reported a bug for this and am investigating it, in the
meantime, let's restore the workaround, elaborated a bit, and
looking for the 'Software is up to date' screen instead of the
error message.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
I rather suspect the *bug* is still basically present and it's
why this test often fails, but we no longer seem to see the
*error message* which lets us detect the bug happening. This
needle has not been hit by any test for six months. So let's
remove the workaround as it adds complexity.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
An selinux alert can hide the 'getting started' window title, so
let's have a variant needle which matches on the big 'Started'
in the window instead. We may as well have both for maximum
match potential.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
Seems on x86_64 the text cursor is at the left of the text entry
box, but on aarch64 it's at the right. I have no idea why.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
Seems like the indicator arrow's vertical position changed in
F28, for some reason. Anyway, new needles.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
Time for an annual spring clean. Based on the admin UI's list
of needles that haven't been matched for a long time, but with
some manual tweaking (some are actually still needed).
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
The way GNOME Software displays an error after running into RHBZ
1314991 has changed, it seems, so we need a variant needle to
cope with that. Also, when an upgrade notification is visible,
the 'Restart & Update' button for doing a regular update is
shown in grey (not blue), so we need a variant needle to handle
that too.
We can deal with this annoying bug by looking out for the error
we see when it happens, hitting the 'refresh' button again, and
resetting the loop counter to 1 (requires changing the loop to
a C-style loop).
Well, that OCR needle isn't working out so great, as it seems
to match when it shouldn't:
https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/119217#step/_graphical_wait_login/5
So let's try another approach. Ditch the OCR needle and have a
function for checking we're at a clean desktop. It does the
normal needle match, but if we're on GNOME, it also tries
hitting alt+f1 and seeing if we're at the overview; if so, it
hits alt+f1 again (to go back to the desktop) and returns.
The F26 background does not change with the time of day, so that
needle should serve as-is, it's just no use for Rawhide. For
Rawhide, let's try a needle with an OCR match on 'Activities',
plus a tiny match area for a pure white block (expected to be
matched in the user menu area), since os-autoinst requires all
needles to include a match area for some reason.
These are no use :/ The Rawhide default background is a 'changes
with the time of day' one, and with the transparent top bar,
that makes a proper needle match impossible to reliably achieve,
as there is not a single pixel of the 'clean desktop' which
will always be the same any more. We'll have to come up with
something else. I'm trying out the use of an OCR match now.
The GNOME top bar is now transparent in Rawhide, which broke the
'clean desktop' needle. It also means it'll break every time
the background changes, from now on :( Update the needle.
openQA has some problems handling needles with identical names
in different subdirectories. We haven't had the cycles to send
fixes for this yet, so for now, let's just rename all such
needles we have.
Summary:
Include some basic testing of Japanese input, and split the
input testing (including Russian) into a separate module, since
it's not really part of 'login' testing.
Test Plan:
Run the test, and the Russian and French tests too to
make sure they didn't break. Tested on staging. Note the Japanese
test soft fails, intentionally, at present, as I discovered a bug
while working on it:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=776189
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D1072
Summary:
The non-English tests so far did not test that graphical login
worked as expected, which is a fairly large hole. With this
change, they should do a Workstation install and test login to
both GNOME and the console works as expected. KDE is not yet
tested.
As part of this we tweak the implementation of keyboard layout
switching in graphical environments to use a generic function
in main_common which can handle both anaconda and desktops
(just GNOME at present, but should extend easily to any desktop
with a known switcher key and a visible layout indicator),
replacing the anacondatest class method. I kinda don't like that
the test has to specifically tell the function when it's in
anaconda, but I don't think I want to start experimenting with
a global 'test phase' openQA variable or anything like that at
present.
Fixes T842.
Test Plan:
Run the French and Russian install tests and check
they work as expected. Also run an English Workstation install
if you like, and make sure that didn't break. This change is
live on staging ATM, seems to work fine.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Maniphest Tasks: T842
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D1071
Summary:
GNOME's update notification criteria are pretty braindead: it
fires the update check timer once on login then once every hour
thereafter, but only actually checks for and notifies of updates
once a day if it's after 6am(?!?!?!). So we have to do a bunch
of fiddling around to ensure we reliably get a notification.
Move the clock to 6am if it's earlier than that, and reset the
'last update check' timer to 48 hours ago, then log in to GNOME
after that.
Note: I thought this still wasn't fully reliable, but I've looked
into all the recent failures of either test on staging and
there's only one which was really 'no update notification came
up', and the logs clearly indicate PK did run an update check,
so I don't think that was a test bug (I think something went
wrong with the update check). The other failures are all 'GNOME
did something wacky', plus one case where the needle didn't quite
match because I think the match area is slightly too tall; I'll
fix that in a second.
Test Plan:
Run the tests on both KDE and GNOME and check they
work properly now (assuming nothing unrelated breaks, like KDE
crashing...)
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D1039
Summary:
I started out wanting to fix an issue I noticed today where
graphical upgrade tests were failing because they didn't wait
for the graphical login screen properly; the test was sitting
at the 'full Fedora logo' state of plymouth for a long time,
so the current boot_to_login_screen's wait_still_screen was
triggered by it and the function wound up failing on the
assert_screen, because it was still some time before the real
login screen appeared.
So I tweaked the boot_to_login_screen implementation to work
slightly differently (look for a login screen match, *then* -
if we're dealing with a graphical login - wait_still_screen
to defeat the 'old GPU buffer showing login screen' problem
and assert the login screen again). But while working on it,
I figured we really should consolidate all the various places
that handle the bootloader -> login, we were doing it quite
differently in all sorts of different places. And as part of
that, I converted the base tests to use POSTINSTALL (and thus
go through the shared _wait_login tests) instead of handling
boot themselves. As part of *that*, I tweaked main.pm to not
require all POSTINSTALL tests have the _postinstall suffix on
their names, as it really doesn't make sense, and renamed the
tests.
Test Plan: Run all tests, see if they work.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D1015
Summary:
this more or less covers desktop_error_checks and desktop_
update_notification, though it can't really distinguish
between them easily. All we know is that if both the live and
postinstall versions of this test pass, both of those tests
pass. Any fails will have to be investigated manually.
Test Plan:
Run the tests for both KDE and Workstation, see
what happens. Workstation will fail for F25 and Rawhide at
present, due to SELinux/abrt notifications.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D1004
Summary:
Very similar to the CLI update test, but using the desktops'
update applications. This is based off the CLI update test
branch as it uses the shared functions that branch introduced.
We do not use the fake update packages, as they don't really
do anything useful for these tests; for dnf they can help us
distinguish between issues with the dnf mechanism and issues
with the repos, but we can't really tell that in the graphical
case. So we only use the python3-kickstart package here.
Test Plan:
Run the test on both KDE and GNOME and ensure it
performs as intended. I've been testing it on staging, so you
can see it there.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D1010
