We need to hit 'restart' after applying updates, and we also
need the 'done' needle *not* to match the restart message, so
change that to match on the text (unfortunately). That also
means we have to add another variant of the needle for F32 as
the background of the text is a different color there.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
This PR adds a test that uses the Blivet interface to create an LVM
layout with ext4 filesystem as well as a postinstall test that checks
that the LVM layout has been created correctly.
We finally saw a test where there were *no* errors logged by the
time Cockpit reached the log screen, so there were no entries to
click. Let's just make the test set log level to info before
looking for entries - I prefer this to 'click entry if found,
otherwise change log level' as that's twice as many branches to
look after. Of course, it means the warning triangle entry needle
is useless now :(
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
KDE in F34+ is now placing sleep, restart and shutdown buttons
right on the system menu, not in a submenu. So we need to sort of
tweak this logic. The approach here is: we count the GNOME
submenu as both a "power" and "leave" menu, so the needle to
enter it has both tags. KDE still has a "leave" submenu, but the
power options are not in a submenu any more, so the new "leave"
needle only has the leave tag, not the power tag. For "leave"
actions we just unconditionally expect the "leave" tag; for
power actions we first match on *either* the submenu tag (for
GNOME and earlier KDE) *or* the action tag, click whatever we
found, and then if we matched the submenu (not the action), we
assert and click the action. After that all paths should be in
sync again and we can continue.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
Cockpit 237 has misaligned radio buttons here. We know about the
issue and want the test to not fail on unrelated updates, so let's
make it a soft fail.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
This PR uses the Anaconda Blivet partitioning to recreate a partition
layout while preserving the content of the /home subvolume.
It also adds the postinstall test to check that the home has been
preserved.
This PR adds the `install_btrfs_upload` to install the btrfs based
image, the `btrfs_preserve_home_extras` to prepare and test the data
on the home partition, as well as the `custom_btrfs_preserve_home` that
uses the preinstalled btrfs image and uses its current partitioning to
preserve the home partition and the data on it.
We don't always get a smartd error any more, so add one for a
different error that's more consistent ATM.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
The background seems to be different in different tests, even
the reduced area I tried most recently seems to be different in
some runs. So let's just match in the text area instead. This
captures some "Fedora" text so it should still notice if branding
is broken.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
Required because ppc64le has a PReP partition
before boot partition.
PReP partition must not be changed by this script.
Signed-off-by: Michel Normand <normand@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
The font of the identifier text got a bit smaller. I think it
looks kinda bad now, but it's not an outright bug, so just
living with it. I did file an upstream issue:
https://github.com/cockpit-project/cockpit/issues/15111
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
There's a race issue with just treating it as a next button: it's
not in the same place as a next button. Sometimes in the g-i-s
code we actually get ahead of ourselves and click early, which
isn't really a problem when the buttons are all in the same
place, but if we click "Start Setup" in the middle of transition
to the Privacy screen - as in
https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/745034#step/_graphical_wait_login/4
- the click effectively gets lost. So let's make it its own tag
and have the initial assert look for it too. That way we won't
match on it again in the main loop over "@nexts".
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
There seem to be some weird shenanigans going on with the pipe
bit here (it looks different on different test runs? what?) so
let's just match on the plain grey area. Should still be enough.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
Just matching the Overview entry isn't really enough, the app
hasn't really run yet. This makes the test more robust and also
helps out on aarch64 desktop tests where the app window takes a
long time to appear.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
