The open dialog on Silverblue (which is apparently not at all
the same thing as the open dialog on Workstation, though they
look the same) does not default to the Documents folder, so we
have to open it.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
These all failed to match first time the test was run in
production. I guess Lukas was working from an older release.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
This PR fixes issue #188. It adds a test suite to test basic
functionality of Evince and brings the following features:
* test scripts for various Evince functions.
* needles to support the Evince test scripts
* new template variables `TESTPATH` and `POSTINSTALL_LOAD_ALL` (see
below)
* new logic in `main.py` (see below)
The new variables and the new logic make it easier to create test
suites for post-installation tests. If TESTPATH is used, OpenQA
will take all tests mentioned in POSTINSTALL from that specified
TESTPATH. If both TESTPATH and POSTINSTALL_LOAD_ALL are used, then
OpenQA will run all tests it can find at the TESTPATH location.
If POSTINSTALL and POSTINSTALL_LOAD_ALL are set simultaneously,
then only POSTINSTALL will be taken into account and OpenQA will
only load tests mentioned there.
Recent git os-autoinst no longer downsamples screenshots as far
as it did before comparison. This makes a lot of needles where
colors have changed slightly no longer match, so they all needed
updating.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
Not sure why these changed, but oh well. Utilities menu was
highlighted in a test run for some reason, so let's just handle
that. Other needles changed very slightly.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
Some apps moved around, others the needles stopped matching for
some reason, some kind of slight scale change or something.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
Just matching the Overview entry isn't really enough, the app
hasn't really run yet. This makes the test more robust and also
helps out on aarch64 desktop tests where the app window takes a
long time to appear.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
Not sure if the needles changed or just the way they're rendered
in the overview, but either way, we need to update a bunch.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
The little triangle that's used on drop-down menus and stuff got
bigger. That breaks all these needles.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
I call this...The @lruzicka Catcher!
It's a script that checks for needles that aren't actually used
anywhere. It also checks for cases where we have a needle JSON
file but no image, or an image file but no JSON file (and wipes
one case of the latter). It also adds a run of the script to tox
so we get it in CI.
You could make this script a lot more elaborate if you like, by
being fancier about parsing the test code and templates, but I
don't think it's really warranted, I think it just needs to be
'good enough'. It's not the end of the world if it misses the
odd thing or the whitelisting goes stale.
Quite a lot of the removed needles are remnants of different
approaches to app start/stop testing which weren't caught in the
initial PR review. The short-name partitioning ones are odd; they
were introduced in the commit that moved needles into subdirs,
but at least some of them don't actually appear to be moves. They
may have been non-tracked files Josef had lying around that got
into the commit by mistake, or they may just be old needles we
really used at some point but aren't using any more.
reclaim_space_second_partition was introduced as part of the
shrink test (along with reclaim_space_first_partition) but was
never actually used by that test - I guess, again, the test got
re-written during review but we forgot to remove the needle. We
rejigged user creation to use tab presses not a needle match a
while back, which made user_creation_password_input unnecessary.
The various cockpit_updates_* needles are I think remnants of
rewrites of the cockpit update tests that again were missed in
PR review, the tests as merged never used them.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
Remove a bunch of needles that have not been used for some time,
plus a few workarounds that are similarly stale.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
We still have a 'apps_run_firefox_stop' needle tag which is for
the same thing as 'firefox_close_tabs'. That's dumb. Get rid of
it and only have the firefox_close_tabs tag and needles. Also
clean up some old firefox_close_tabs needles that haven't matched
for months and all the 'apps_run_firefox_stop' needles.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
Removing this broke the GNOME apps test entirely because there
was no GNOME 'workspace' needle any more.
I don't like this needle much, we should probably use
check_desktop_clean or something instead. But for now let's just
put it back.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
The KDE and GNOME 'apps' tests for Firefox both invented their
own 'oh look Firefox is running' needle, even though we already
had one. The GNOME one was broken by the removal of the app
title bar in Firefox 66.
Instead of having three needles for the same thing, let's just
throw the 'apps' ones out and use the pre-existing one from
needles/firefox for all cases.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
Utilities came up different *again* in a Rawhide test today, so
this adds a needle which matches on the text. Usually we prefer
image matches to text, but this image seems to keep changing...
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
Dunno why we need yet *another*, but even the new one didn't
match on the most recent Branched compose. For now just add
another, we can look in a few weeks which can be thrown away.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
As of Fedora-30-20190316.n.1, gnome-abrt is back under the
Utilities menu and the 'Sundry' menu seems to have disappeared.
Change the test back to using utilities and drop the sundry
needle.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
The needle could sometimes fail because the item it was looking
for only appeared in a limited set of situations. The new
location should be safer to check and the test should not
fail as a result.
