Sigh, 'overloaded' product templates like that don't quite work.
So, let's try doing it a different way, in main.pm.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
Workstation live installs for F28+ drop the user creation and
root password panes from anaconda, so we need to not try and
use them any more. But we still want the old behaviour for F27.
I'm hoping this approach will work, if not, we'll find out soon
enough. This removes the install_no_user test for F28+ as it
will no longer differ from the install_default test.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
Atomic was renamed AtomicHost, and Workstation Ostree was renamed
AtomicWorkstation, for F28+. As we still have F26 and F27 images
which will have the Atomic name, we duplicate those templates,
but there should be no more 'Workstation Ostree' images, so we
just rename those templates to the new name.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
This is currently broken, but openQA doesn't notice; we really
should. We could also check the default in other cases, but I
think that's less clear-cut, as it's kind of an anaconda design
choice, it's not mandated in Fedora requirements anywhere.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
virtio graphics still seem to suffer from RHBZ#1403365, and also
os-autoinst believes they don't support snapshotting. So let's
try qxl for x86_64 UEFI. *That* may still suffer from #1403343,
but oh well, seems like we have no good choices here.
It looks like ppc64 also suffers from the Plymouth bug that's
affecting x86_64 UEFI + 'std' graphics, so let's use virtio
there - qxl apparently isn't available on ppc64 VMs, at least it
doesn't work in our deployment.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
While Rawhide suffers from #1518464 , virtio is a better choice
for UEFI tests, even if we get the problem with consoles using
the wrong color scheme again...
* use only a subset of tests for ppc64 and ppc64le
with a new "Fedora PowerPC group"
and only three flavors
"Server-boot-iso", "Server-dvd-iso", "universal",
* TEST_TARGET for all PowerPC Products set as ISO
* increase disk size for asian cyrillic and european tests
add HDDSIZEGB = 12 for related tests
install_asian_language install_cyrillic_language
install_european_language
This is required to avoid anaconda failure like:
(my own translation)
"... Fedora requests 10.03GB of free space,
with 5.95GB for software and 4.08GB for swap.
Your selected disks have the following free space:
10GB free space for use..."
* Remove hardcoded arch in some HDD_1 key replaced by ARCH variable
That concerns the images generated by createhdds tool
(only for supported PowerPC tests not all of them)
eg change from:
"disk_f%CURRREL%_support_3_x86_64.img"
to:
"disk_f%CURRREL%_support_3_%ARCH%.img"
Warning: use ARCH and not MACHINE variable
* Try to keep same order for PowerPC as for x86_64 tests
and same priorities as documented in
cid a5861ebc5d56a8b8d7fca40e00f21b21a203c371:
0-20: critical smoke tests (higher than Alpha priority)
20-29: Alpha priority
30-39: Beta priority
40-49: Final priority
50+: Optional priority
* force nfsvers=4 as bypass bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1386059https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368932
* role_deploy_domain_controller failed for ppc64 (BE)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1437793
* Warning: tests failure for PowerPC, not added:
install_delete_pata
install_sata
install_package_set_kde
install_updates_img_local
* tests not tried:
upgrade_server_domain_controller
upgrade_realmd_client
upgrade_desktop_encrypted_64bit
* Note: TIMEOUT_SCALE initially set for PowerPC machines
has been removed from this commit as seems not required
anymore after upstream merge.
Will need to track if two following timer values
may create problem on remote openQA instances:
tests/install_source_graphical.pm (300 to 600)
tests/_boot_to_anaconda.pm (300 to 1200)
Signed-off-by: Guy Menanteau <menantea@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michel Normand <normand@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
This seems to be needed to prevent openQA trying to run x86_64
jobs on ppc64 workers (which, uh, doesn't go very well). openQA
is kinda supposed to not do this, but it seems like that got
broken somewhere along the line:
https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/20812
Summary:
As we're getting the Workstation dvd-ostree (OStree installer
image) built for Rawhide now, let's try testing it.
Test Plan:
Run the tests on a Rawhide compose that works and
has the image (e.g. 20170615.n.0). Check that new tests work
as expected and old tests are not adversely affected. A
corresponding diff for fedora_openqa will be coming to take
care of scheduling. Note that the tests will often soft fail
for now; this is intentional due to RHBZ#1193590, the bash
prompt for root is incorrect on ostree installs, so I have
added a needle that matches the incorrect prompt but which is
flagged as a workaround needle (so causing the test result to
be a soft fail).
Reviewers: jsedlak, jskladan
Reviewed By: jsedlak
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qa.fedoraproject.org/D1211
Summary:
This just adds the FreeIPA web UI and password change
test modules to the FreeIPA upgrade test (client end). It's
useful to check out these features too. We don't need to
separate these into separate jobs, as we're not trying to
fill out different matrix checkboxes here, we just want to
know whether everything works.
Test Plan:
Run the test, see that the modules work properly.
I was actually expecting this to fail given the issues with
the upgrade on the server end, but it seems to pass.
Reviewers: jsedlak, jskladan
Reviewed By: jsedlak
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qa.fedoraproject.org/D1207
Summary:
This adds an upgrade variant of the FreeIPA tests, with only
the simplest client enrolment (sssd) for now. The server test
starts from the N-1 release and deploys the domain controller
role. The client test similarly starts from the N-1 release
and, when the server is deployed, enrols as a domain client.
Then the server upgrades itself, while the client waits (as the
server is its name server). Then the client upgrades itself,
while the server does some self-checks. The server then waits
for the client to do its checks before decommissioning itself,
as usual. So, summary: *deployment* of both server and client
occurs on N-1, then both are upgraded, then the actual *checks*
occur on N.
In my testing, this all more or less works, except the role
decommission step fails. This failure seems to be a genuine one
so far as I can tell; I intend to file a bug for it soon.
Test Plan:
Run the new tests, check they work. Run the existing
FreeIPA tests (both the compose and the update variants), check
they both behave the same.
Reviewers: jsedlak, jskladan
Reviewed By: jsedlak
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qa.fedoraproject.org/D1204
Summary:
This adds a new test suite, run for Workstation and KDE live
images, which does not create a user during install. It then
expects initial-setup (KDE) or gnome-initial-setup (Workstation)
to appear after install, creates a user, and proceeds with
normal boot.
Note the ARM image test already covers the initial-setup text
mode, and the ARM minimal image is the only case where that
actually matters (it's not included in Server).
Test Plan:
Run the new tests, check they work. Run all old
tests, check the changes didn't break them.
Reviewers: jsedlak, jskladan
Reviewed By: jsedlak
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qa.fedoraproject.org/D1185
Summary:
For some reason, we have `USER_LOGIN` set to 'false' for the KDE
package set install test. I really don't know / remember why
that would be; I'd think we should create a user and log in as
that user to make sure it works properly when installing KDE
from the traditional installer. It's not strictly part of the
package set test, true, but still, seems worth doing.
Also, when `USER_LOGIN` is set to 'false' and the installer runs,
we create a user called 'false'. This doesn't seem like what we
wanted, so let's not do that. I dunno if there are any other
cases besides the KDE one that this commit changes, but still.
Test Plan:
Run the full test suite and look for weirdness, check
KDE package set test works as intended (now creates a user called
'test' and logs in as that user).
Reviewers: jsedlak, jskladan
Reviewed By: jsedlak
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qa.fedoraproject.org/D1182
Explicitly specify the ahci0.0 bus for the HDD in install_sata.
This is needed to work if we are using CDMODEL=ide-cd (which we
need at present to work around a bug with SCSI CDs), and is a
good idea anyway to ensure the drive is actually connected to
the SATA bus (I dunno if it was before or not).
Summary:
This adds an entirely new workflow for testing distribution
updates. The `ADVISORY` variable is introduced: when set,
`main.pm` will load an early post-install test that sets up
a repository containing the packages from the specified update,
runs `dnf -y update`, and reboots. A new templates file is
added, `templates-updates`, which adds two new flavors called
`updates-server` and `updates-workstation`, each containing
job templates for appropriate post-install tests. Scheduler is
expected to post `ADVISORY=(update ID) HDD_1=(base image)
FLAVOR=updates-(server|workstation)`, where (base image) is one
of the stable release base disk images produced by `createhdds`
and usually used for upgrade testing. This will result in the
appropriate job templates being loaded.
We rejig postinstall test loading and static network config a
bit so that this works for both the 'compose' and 'updates' test
flows: we have to ensure we bring up networking for the tap
tests before we try and install the updates, but still allow
later adjustment of the configuration. We take advantage of the
openQA feature that was added a few months back to run the same
module multiple times, so the `_advisory_update` module can
reboot after installing the updates and the modules that take
care of bootloader, encryption and login get run again. This
looks slightly wacky in the web UI, though - it doesn't show the
later runs of each module.
We also use the recently added feature to specify `+HDD_1` in
the test suites which use a disk image uploaded by an earlier
post-install test, so the test suite value will take priority
over the value POSTed by the scheduler for those tests, and we
will use the uploaded disk image (and not the clean base image
POSTed by the scheduler) for those tests.
My intent here is to enhance the scheduler, adding a consumer
which listens out for critpath updates, and runs this test flow
for each one, then reports the results to ResultsDB where Bodhi
could query and display them. We could also add a list of other
packages to have one or both sets of update tests run on it, I
guess.
Test Plan:
Try a post something like:
HDD_1=disk_f25_server_3_x86_64.img DISTRI=fedora VERSION=25
FLAVOR=updates-server ARCH=x86_64 BUILD=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c
ADVISORY=FEDORA-2017-376ae2b92c CURRREL=25 PREVREL=24
Pick an appropriate `ADVISORY` (ideally, one containing some
packages which might actually be involved in the tests), and
matching `FLAVOR` and `HDD_1`. The appropriate tests should run,
a repo with the update packages should be created and enabled
(and dnf update run), and the tests should work properly. Also
test a regular compose run to make sure I didn't break anything.
Reviewers: jskladan, jsedlak
Reviewed By: jsedlak
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qa.fedoraproject.org/D1143
The rule for test priorities is pretty simple. Ranges of
priority values map to the 'Milestone' by which the test must
be passing, per the release criteria. The priority for each
openQA test is the *highest* priority for any wiki test case /
criterion it covers.
0-20: critical smoke tests (higher than Alpha priority)
20-29: Alpha priority
30-39: Beta priority
40-49: Final priority
50+: Optional priority
Note that tests for non-release-blocking arches or images must
always be over 50; I've simply added 50 to the values for all
i386 tests in this change. Other than that, I just corrected a
few values which had got out of whack or were originally set
wrong.
Summary:
This adds a new test, memory_check, which just does a default
package set install with `inst.debug` parameter then uploads
the memory usage file (`/tmp/memory.dat`) at the end. We can
have check-compose use the data to analyze changes in memory
usage over time.
Test Plan:
Fire off the Workstation network install image tests
and make sure the memory usage test runs and works on all three
machines. This is live on staging already.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel_but_actually_jsedlak_who_uses_stupid_nicknames
Reviewed By: garretraziel_but_actually_jsedlak_who_uses_stupid_nicknames
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qa.fedoraproject.org/D1082
Summary:
Include some basic testing of Japanese input, and split the
input testing (including Russian) into a separate module, since
it's not really part of 'login' testing.
Test Plan:
Run the test, and the Russian and French tests too to
make sure they didn't break. Tested on staging. Note the Japanese
test soft fails, intentionally, at present, as I discovered a bug
while working on it:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=776189
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D1072
Using 'host' is, for some reason, causing the problem where non-
minimal installs fail to boot. No idea why, but switching the
CPU model to Nehalem solves it.
Summary:
The non-English tests so far did not test that graphical login
worked as expected, which is a fairly large hole. With this
change, they should do a Workstation install and test login to
both GNOME and the console works as expected. KDE is not yet
tested.
As part of this we tweak the implementation of keyboard layout
switching in graphical environments to use a generic function
in main_common which can handle both anaconda and desktops
(just GNOME at present, but should extend easily to any desktop
with a known switcher key and a visible layout indicator),
replacing the anacondatest class method. I kinda don't like that
the test has to specifically tell the function when it's in
anaconda, but I don't think I want to start experimenting with
a global 'test phase' openQA variable or anything like that at
present.
Fixes T842.
Test Plan:
Run the French and Russian install tests and check
they work as expected. Also run an English Workstation install
if you like, and make sure that didn't break. This change is
live on staging ATM, seems to work fine.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Maniphest Tasks: T842
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D1071
Summary:
I've been wanting to do this for a while; I think it'll let us
check for some significant changes between composes. This should
cause runs of a few test cases to collect and upload info on:
* installed packages
* free memory
* disk space
* active services
* 1 minute of CPU usage info (via top)
immediately after install and initial login. In some cases this
will be useful / interesting simply to look at directly, but
we can also have check-compose analyze the data and include
significant changes in its reports.
Test Plan:
Run affected tests, make sure the data collection
works.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D1046
Summary:
GNOME's update notification criteria are pretty braindead: it
fires the update check timer once on login then once every hour
thereafter, but only actually checks for and notifies of updates
once a day if it's after 6am(?!?!?!). So we have to do a bunch
of fiddling around to ensure we reliably get a notification.
Move the clock to 6am if it's earlier than that, and reset the
'last update check' timer to 48 hours ago, then log in to GNOME
after that.
Note: I thought this still wasn't fully reliable, but I've looked
into all the recent failures of either test on staging and
there's only one which was really 'no update notification came
up', and the logs clearly indicate PK did run an update check,
so I don't think that was a test bug (I think something went
wrong with the update check). The other failures are all 'GNOME
did something wacky', plus one case where the needle didn't quite
match because I think the match area is slightly too tall; I'll
fix that in a second.
Test Plan:
Run the tests on both KDE and GNOME and check they
work properly now (assuming nothing unrelated breaks, like KDE
crashing...)
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D1039
These keep failing because they don't work right. I have it
partially fixed on a branch but not fully fixed yet, and it's
been this way for a few weeks already, so let's disable the
tests for now until I can actually complete the fix.
Goes along with the commit to openqa_fedora_tools that makes
flavor generation go through fedfind's `correct_image` helper,
which changes the 'type' of ostree installer images from 'boot'
to 'dvd-ostree'. See https://pagure.io/pungi/issue/417 for
more background on this. Committing without review as it's an
urgent issue we have to fix right away.
Summary:
I started out wanting to fix an issue I noticed today where
graphical upgrade tests were failing because they didn't wait
for the graphical login screen properly; the test was sitting
at the 'full Fedora logo' state of plymouth for a long time,
so the current boot_to_login_screen's wait_still_screen was
triggered by it and the function wound up failing on the
assert_screen, because it was still some time before the real
login screen appeared.
So I tweaked the boot_to_login_screen implementation to work
slightly differently (look for a login screen match, *then* -
if we're dealing with a graphical login - wait_still_screen
to defeat the 'old GPU buffer showing login screen' problem
and assert the login screen again). But while working on it,
I figured we really should consolidate all the various places
that handle the bootloader -> login, we were doing it quite
differently in all sorts of different places. And as part of
that, I converted the base tests to use POSTINSTALL (and thus
go through the shared _wait_login tests) instead of handling
boot themselves. As part of *that*, I tweaked main.pm to not
require all POSTINSTALL tests have the _postinstall suffix on
their names, as it really doesn't make sense, and renamed the
tests.
Test Plan: Run all tests, see if they work.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D1015
