Commit graph

12 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Adam Williamson
fead784087 Except IoT from the 'no 0.x -release in candidate compose' rule
IoT does nightly Branched and Rawhide composes that are built
as RC candidates, for some reason. So let's except it from this
check.

Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
2020-05-13 10:55:09 -07:00
Adam Williamson
21ecfa8538 os_release: blow up on RC compose with prerelease fedora-release
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
2020-05-11 16:05:47 -07:00
Adam Williamson
6f9ee2484c Fix prerelease check in os_release.pm
Whoops, bracket in wrong place...

Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
2020-05-11 15:41:21 -07:00
Adam Williamson
acc46464f8 Revise release variable handling, prerelease checks, os-release
I started out trying to fix os-release for the recent change to
add "Prerelease" tags to the VERSION and PRETTY_NAME fields, then
things spiralled. It got me thinking about the awkward DEVELOPMENT
variable we use, so I decided to get rid of it and refactor the
few things that use it. I refactored the anaconda prerelease tag
check, and wrote a new giant comment that gives details about
exactly how anaconda decides whether to show those tags, to give
context to our choices about when to expect them. This check now
uses a new LABEL variable the scheduler now sets. I also wound up
creating new UP1REL and UP2REL vars to define the 'source' release
for upgrade tests, separate from CURRREL and PREVREL, which are
now never lies - they really are the current stable and previous
stable release, even for update upgrade tests.

Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
2020-05-07 15:42:08 -07:00
Adam Williamson
cced8f5428 Tweak release_identification for awkward IoT 33 branch
IoT created a branch that's basically Rawhide but is versioned
33. This causes the release_identification tests to fail. I don't
think they'll change this on their end, so let's just have the
test cope with it and expect branches versioned as the Rawhide
release number to behave as Rawhide does here.

Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
2020-03-18 11:45:27 -07:00
Adam Williamson
c884842439 Update expected Silverblue os-release strings
It seems to be actually installing fedora-release-silverblue now
so we get correct identification here. Update the tests.

Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
2020-03-18 10:46:13 -07:00
Adam Williamson
1d4557126a os_release: fix ISO parsing for 'Fedora-IoT' composes
Also comment this better. We need to index from the end of the
string here, not the start, because going from the start breaks
when the compose shortname has a dash in it.

Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
2020-02-26 12:01:06 -08:00
Adam Williamson
0f8f6082eb Enable IoT testing with install and base tests
IoT is becoming a release-blocking edition for F32, so we should
be testing it for sure. We may add specific tests, but for now
let's run the install and base tests on it.

Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
2020-02-17 08:36:55 -08:00
Lukas Ruzicka
519e6a8d20 Fix Silveblue Beta Values 2019-10-08 14:36:49 +02:00
Lukas Ruzicka
5aa9ca1cf3 Fix VERSION and PRETTY_NAME os-release checks for Silverblue.
This PR fixes #124.
It uses the BUILD variable to get the build string from the
tested compose and uses it to compare correct values for Silverblue.
Originally, it used Workstation values that did not match the
Silveblue ones.

Delete bad yank.
2019-10-08 11:08:58 +02:00
Adam Williamson
bf5691e69d Fix and simplify fedora_release test
Also simplify os_release a bit thanks to the improved spell_
version_number.

Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
2019-08-21 13:09:40 -07:00
Lukas Ruzicka
d06b30e8dc Add new testcases and methods for release identification. 2019-07-30 15:45:02 -07:00