IoT is becoming a release-blocking edition for F32, so we should
be testing it for sure. We may add specific tests, but for now
let's run the install and base tests on it.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
This reduces the coverage of the identification test a bit but
also *substantially* simplifies it. We run into a ton of problems
when we try to check the version and prerelease text on screens
where it appears on banners:
* The banners differ between variants
* The pre-release text is translated
* The banners have gradients so for RTL languages, even if some
text is untranslated (e.g. 'Fedora 31') it appears on a
different background color than on LTR languages
* The prerelease text is dark red; if it appears on a dark blue
area of the banner this can trigger an os-autoinst needle
comparison bug: https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/56822
All of this together means we wind up continually fighting these
checks and we have a whole forest of needles just for them, and
it doesn't seem worthwhile. So let's drop all the places where
we were checking version and prerelease on banners, and only
check them in two places where they appear on a grey background,
which avoids most of the problems (we just need one version
needle per release, and one prerelease needle per language).
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
We need another needle for French installs, and we need to use
ISO_URL for checking the ISO file name if ISO isn't set.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
These showed up because I did a manual universal flavor run on
an ISO today, but we'll need them as soon as we do a candidate
compose too.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
The top bar differs in non-English languages - for RTL the
version ident is on the left (so background is different), and
the width of the area with no text differs depending on the
length of the translations.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
Split this out of install_default, because it really is not a
part of that test and we do not want that test to fail because
the desktop background is wrong. Make it its own test module
and test suite instead. Don't do it on Rawhide, because we
really can't assert anything worthwhile about Rawhide at the
moment at least (this means the test runs but is a no-op and
will always pass on Rawhide, unfortunately). Move the needles
to a more appropriate location (this has nothing to do with
anaconda) and use 'background' not 'wallpaper' naming (that's
the name we use elsewhere in the project, e.g. package names).
Also, run the test on updates, and add an F29 needle for this
purpose.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
The backgrounds we have are F30 backgrounds, not F31: there are
no F31 backgrounds yet, F31 images are using F30 backgrounds
(which is a bug we should file). Also we really only need one
F30 background needle to match both KDE and GNOME if we pick a
sensible area of the screen to use, and let's use one that has
a bit more contrast for safer matching.
Note: F30 background is *meant* to be animated, but in fact
neither GNOME nor KDE seems to use the animated version by
default. Which makes our lives easier! Sucks for whoever put in
the work to animate it, though.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
