OK, looked into it some more and ultimately we had problems here
because of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1908791
in fact. The password prompt was taking far longer than usual to
appear because pam_fprintd was failing because of that bug. That
should be fixed with next Firefox build, so I think it's best to
just leave this as it was, because in the usual course of events
it works fine and it saves having another needle to maintain.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
...nope, wait_screen_change wasn't enough. Let's just assert the
needle. Not sure if the existing one will work, if not we'll add
one.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
Sigh I hate this test. We seem to be typing root pw before the
terminal is ready for us:
https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/745007#step/desktop_terminal/3
Let's try this. Hopefully it'll wait for the Password: prompt
before typing, without us having to actually add a needle...
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
There's a race issue with just treating it as a next button: it's
not in the same place as a next button. Sometimes in the g-i-s
code we actually get ahead of ourselves and click early, which
isn't really a problem when the buttons are all in the same
place, but if we click "Start Setup" in the middle of transition
to the Privacy screen - as in
https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/745034#step/_graphical_wait_login/4
- the click effectively gets lost. So let's make it its own tag
and have the initial assert look for it too. That way we won't
match on it again in the main loop over "@nexts".
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
There seem to be some weird shenanigans going on with the pipe
bit here (it looks different on different test runs? what?) so
let's just match on the plain grey area. Should still be enough.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
Using .local is apparently Bad Form because it's reserved for
mDNS. However there doesn't appear to be any particularly Good
Form for what to call a test domain you never want to exist
outside of a closed system, apparently. Sigh. Let's try this.
Includes a bump to disk_ks version because the kickstarts on
that image also need to have this change applied.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
Otherwise we can immediately match 'fs is already selected'
for the *previously selected* fs before the UI updates and exit
without actually changing the fs of the intended partition.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
This is another known "fails due to no hardware" case:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1894654
those are explicitly excluded from the release criterion, so a
soft failure is appropriate.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
Just matching the Overview entry isn't really enough, the app
hasn't really run yet. This makes the test more robust and also
helps out on aarch64 desktop tests where the app window takes a
long time to appear.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
We don't *need* to log out from the desktop and reboot from the
DM here, that's not part of the test (we test those features
later using jim and jack). Now we don't black out the background
of test's session in KDE, the logout needle doesn't match, so
instead of redoing that needle all the time or re-adding the
solidify_wallpaper call just to make one needle match reliable,
let's just reboot from the console.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
solidify_wallpaper only does the current session, and does it in
a kind of painful way on each desktop. For apps_startstop this
is kinda okay, but for desktop_login it's slow and error-prone
to do this three times, every time. Let's replace it with a hack
that just replaces the actual wallpaper files with a solid black
PNG file. This only takes effect after a logout, but it should
affect all logins on all desktops once it's done. So long as
the base backgrounds package doesn't change layout too much.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
This makes it so the `wait_still_screen` that comes at the end
of `type_very_safely` happens *after we hit enter*, not after
we type the password but before we hit enter. I'm hoping this
makes the 'set new password at login' more robust on aarch64, it
seems to be failing often.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
This allows us to use assert_script_run, and be more reliable.
Same approach used in _do_install_and_reboot postinstall stuff.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
Another aarch64 robustness fix...sometimes hitting enter at GDM
just doesn't seem to work, let's give it three tries if needed.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
This matches the wait in boot_to_login_screen. The needle can
match before the UI is really done loading, and if we don't wait
long enough we wind up hitting enter before GDM is really ready
for us. This seems to be affecting the test on aarch64 quite
badly.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
Typing into a desktop terminal is a lot less reliable than typing
into a VT. We're seeing failures here quite often on aarch64, so
let's try doing this stuff in a VT instead.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
I tried to bump it before, but set it to 90, which is the default.
Sigh. So this is an actual bump. It looks like until 20201124 this
took about 80 seconds, now it's taking like 93.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
The review for `btrfs_preserve_home` test case has revealed,
that the way how to reach the mountpoint textfield in the Anaconda
partitioning differs between various tests. This PR makes it the
easiest way possible, as is defined by `custom_with_swap` test
case mentioned in the review.
It seems the message got moved to anaconda.log in Rawhide. I
think it should be fine to just check both.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
This PR add the installation test which uses Standard partitioning
with an ext4 filesystem to cover one of the new requirements as
described in issue #202.
Fixed after a review
It still seems to be broken in 233 and 233.1; I limited the
workaround to 232 at first as Cockpit are usually good at fixing
things very fast, but as this one has sat for a while, let's
leave it worked-around until we know it's fixed.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
When Fedora went to BTRFS as a default, we lost the LVM based image to
run LVM resize tests with.
This PR introduces the `install_lvm.pm` installation test that creates
an LVM based qcow2 image to be used by follow-up tests.
Styling on the KDE base disk image seems to have gone wrong
again, which throws this test off. We need to figure out what's
gone wrong in the base image, but it's a Friday night and I don't
want the test failing all weekend, and there's nothing wrong in
the *test itself*, so let's create some workaround needles and
figure it out next week.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
I noticed a pattern lately of VNC tests failing on Rawhide when
we have a debug kernel (but passing with a regular kernel). On
closer investigation I think there's simply a screen blank
happening if the install process takes more than five minutes,
and that's more likely with a debug kernel. This extends the
loop we use to move the mouse every so often while waiting for
the install to complete (which is meant to defeat this sort of
thing) to also click the mouse, when we're a VNC client test. In
a quick check this seemed to help.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
Update a needle with slightly different text rendering, and add
a workaround to hit tab three times rather than once on entering
the "Join a domain" screen, see
https://github.com/cockpit-project/cockpit/issues/14895 .
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
The weird bug turned out to be caused by an internal DNS zone
in the new infra not being signed:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9411
This is now resolved, so we can drop the workaround.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
Per https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/issue/650 , we dropped these
from the wiki, and I agree with @kparal that it doesn't make much
sense to run them any more.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
