Commit Graph

11 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
ec84f927f2
update package switched to acpica-tools 2023-12-30 11:21:27 -08:00
f4c33a4f21
minor cleanup 2023-05-24 08:55:46 -07:00
f39910d953
add missing use statement 2023-05-06 07:56:50 -07:00
7361baef9f
consider Rocky Linux version when adding powertools/crb 2023-05-05 20:57:13 -07:00
8106d07b6c
correct order for enable powertools 2023-04-29 10:41:51 -07:00
c185b5d074
pandoc-common is in powertools 2023-04-29 10:36:08 -07:00
Adam Williamson
f3e92d20c1
Use pandoc-common instead of python3-kickstart for package tests
Reasoning:

1. pandoc is not in critpath so will not itself be tested
2. pandoc is widely used and actively maintained
3. package is noarch
4. package has minimal deps

Hopefully this will work for everything. For some reason, the
"use python3-blivet for pykickstart tests" fails mysteriously
sometimes, see e.g.
https://openqa.stg.fedoraproject.org/tests/2672282

Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Trevor Cooper <tcooper@rockylinux.org>
2023-04-24 08:32:45 -07:00
61d57d4591
enforce standard coding on all Perl files 2023-02-12 14:59:37 -08:00
Adam Williamson
e68e113f76 Remove test_flags comments, add ignore_failure flag
It's not really a good idea to have the comments that explain
the test_flags in *every* test, because they can go stale and
then we either have to live with them being old or update them
all. Like, now. So let's just take 'em all out. There's always
a reference in the openQA and os-autoinst docs, and those get
updated faster.

More importantly, add the new `ignore_failure` flag to relevant
tests - all the tests that don't have the 'important' or
'fatal' flag at present. Upstream killed the 'important' flag
(making all tests 'important' by default), I got it replaced
with the 'ignore_failure' flag, we now need to explicitly mark
all modules we want the 'ignore_failure' behaviour for.
2017-04-10 15:00:10 -07:00
Adam Williamson
e9ce14a891 consolidate login waits, use postinstall not entrypoint for base
Summary:
I started out wanting to fix an issue I noticed today where
graphical upgrade tests were failing because they didn't wait
for the graphical login screen properly; the test was sitting
at the 'full Fedora logo' state of plymouth for a long time,
so the current boot_to_login_screen's wait_still_screen was
triggered by it and the function wound up failing on the
assert_screen, because it was still some time before the real
login screen appeared.

So I tweaked the boot_to_login_screen implementation to work
slightly differently (look for a login screen match, *then* -
if we're dealing with a graphical login - wait_still_screen
to defeat the 'old GPU buffer showing login screen' problem
and assert the login screen again). But while working on it,
I figured we really should consolidate all the various places
that handle the bootloader -> login, we were doing it quite
differently in all sorts of different places. And as part of
that, I converted the base tests to use POSTINSTALL (and thus
go through the shared _wait_login tests) instead of handling
boot themselves. As part of *that*, I tweaked main.pm to not
require all POSTINSTALL tests have the _postinstall suffix on
their names, as it really doesn't make sense, and renamed the
tests.

Test Plan: Run all tests, see if they work.

Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel

Reviewed By: garretraziel

Subscribers: tflink

Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D1015
2016-09-27 11:48:15 -07:00
Adam Williamson
44ec3d84c3 add a base_update_cli test
Summary:
this uses a couple of test repos with fake packages to test the
basic dnf mechanisms are working, then messes around with the
python3-kickstart package a bit to try and test the default repo
configuration is working, keys are in place and so on. We use
python3-kickstart because we should be able to rely on the copy
of that package in the 'stable' repo being installable (or else
the compose would have failed), but it shouldn't be vital to
the operation of the system.

Test Plan: Run the test, see if it works.

Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel

Reviewed By: garretraziel

Subscribers: tflink

Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D1006
2016-09-22 10:57:12 -07:00