Committing without review as this is pretty trivial. Running
top *after* all the other collect_data tasks leads to some
meaningless fluctuations in the output; I intended to look for
activity caused by stuff running 'as usual', not activity from
the other collect_data tasks.
Summary:
I've been wanting to do this for a while; I think it'll let us
check for some significant changes between composes. This should
cause runs of a few test cases to collect and upload info on:
* installed packages
* free memory
* disk space
* active services
* 1 minute of CPU usage info (via top)
immediately after install and initial login. In some cases this
will be useful / interesting simply to look at directly, but
we can also have check-compose analyze the data and include
significant changes in its reports.
Test Plan:
Run affected tests, make sure the data collection
works.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D1046
Summary:
The current installedtest post_fail_hook assumes /var/tmp/abrt
exists at all, and dies if it doesn't, leading to no /var/log
upload. We can also avoid using openQA `script_output` - which
is annoyingly indirect and slow - by using this neat `test -n`
trick I found on SO. Let's also use it in the anacondatest
post_fail_hook to avoid uploading /var/tmp when it's empty
(which we currently do). This also drops the 0 arg from a few
more script_run calls, because it's safe to wait for the run
to complete and we should probably do so to avoid later typing
errors if the commands are slow.
Test Plan:
Cause both anaconda and installed tests to fail and
check the hooks work as intended. Maybe twiddle the failures to
ensure directories do and don't exist and/or have contents and
make sure things work OK. I've tested this to some degree and
I'm pretty sure it works right.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D1041
It's not always in minimal installs. This is a simple change
and needed to make the post-fail hook work for minimal installs,
so pushing without review.
Summary:
GNOME's update notification criteria are pretty braindead: it
fires the update check timer once on login then once every hour
thereafter, but only actually checks for and notifies of updates
once a day if it's after 6am(?!?!?!). So we have to do a bunch
of fiddling around to ensure we reliably get a notification.
Move the clock to 6am if it's earlier than that, and reset the
'last update check' timer to 48 hours ago, then log in to GNOME
after that.
Note: I thought this still wasn't fully reliable, but I've looked
into all the recent failures of either test on staging and
there's only one which was really 'no update notification came
up', and the logs clearly indicate PK did run an update check,
so I don't think that was a test bug (I think something went
wrong with the update check). The other failures are all 'GNOME
did something wacky', plus one case where the needle didn't quite
match because I think the match area is slightly too tall; I'll
fix that in a second.
Test Plan:
Run the tests on both KDE and GNOME and check they
work properly now (assuming nothing unrelated breaks, like KDE
crashing...)
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D1039
We're not really *testing* shutdown here, we're just shutting
down to make sure the uploaded disk image is clean. So we don't
really mind if shutdown takes a while. It often seems to take
longer than 1 minute on KDE installs and cause a soft fail, so
let's bump the timeout to 3 minutes.
These keep failing because they don't work right. I have it
partially fixed on a branch but not fully fixed yet, and it's
been this way for a few weeks already, so let's disable the
tests for now until I can actually complete the fix.
Summary:
os-autoinst implements `script_run` itself now, we aren't
required to implement it ourselves any more. os-autoinst's
implementation is better than ours, as it allows for verifying
the script actually ran (via the redirect-output-to-serial-
console trick).
So this drops our implementation so we'll just use the upstream
one. Where I judged we don't want to bother with the 'check
the command actually ran' feature I've adjusted our direct
`script_run` calls to pass a wait time of 0, which skips the
'wait for command to run' stuff entirely and just does a simple
'type the string and hit enter'.
Because of how the inheritance works, our `assert_script_run`
calls already used the os-autoinst `script_run`, rather than
the one from our distribution.
This should prevent `prepare_test_packages` sometimes going
wrong right after removing the python3-kickstart package, as
we'll properly wait for that removal to complete now (before
we weren't, we'd just start typing the next command while it
was still running, which could result in lost keypresses).
Test Plan:
Check all tests still run OK (I've tried this on
staging and it seems fine).
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D1034
Summary:
The code from `check_type_string` was effectively merged into
os-autoinst's `testapi::type_string` as an optional argument,
so let's drop this downstream version and just have the 'safe
typing' functions use `type_string`.
Test Plan:
Run tests, check they pass and work the same (i.e.
make sure they're actually checking for screen change when
typing).
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D1033
Summary:
Since we started using `type_very_safely` for typing the root
password, we starting hitting a race issue. If we complete the
root password spoke so slowly that the software deployment
process completes in the meantime, anaconda will wait until we
complete the spoke then immediately flip to the 'post-install
configuration' step, at which point access to the USER CREATION
spoke is blocked.
We don't hit this case on regular RPM installs or live installs
as the deployment phase still takes a while for both of those,
but we are sometimes hitting it for the Atomic ostree install
image, as the software deployment phase is pretty fast there.
We *could* just not bother creating a user and testing we can
log in as a user for that test, but I don't like that approach,
we *should* be testing that user creation and login works OK
for ostree installs. So instead, let's just type the root
password a bit less safely for ostree installs; this will be
more vulnerable to typing errors but hopefully will avoid the
race problem.
Test Plan:
Run a few Atomic installs, see if they hit the race.
Might need to run other tests at the same time, and you may not
be able to hit it, this is obviously dependent on the I/O of
the worker host...
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D1022
OK, we once again hit an annoying case where the button match
that doesn't include text got matched in the sidebar:
https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/39576#step/_do_install_and_reboot/13
so I think it's time to give up on that approach and just go
ahead and deal with the button text varying between live and
traditional installs. So let's change the existing needles to
include the button text and add one new needle to cover the
English live F25/F26 case. I don't think we need a 'quit'
needle for F24 (as the only thing we test for F24 is the Atomic
installer image, which says 'Reboot') or for French or Russian
(as we only test a traditional installer image for those, not
a live image).
Goes along with the commit to openqa_fedora_tools that makes
flavor generation go through fedfind's `correct_image` helper,
which changes the 'type' of ostree installer images from 'boot'
to 'dvd-ostree'. See https://pagure.io/pungi/issue/417 for
more background on this. Committing without review as it's an
urgent issue we have to fix right away.
Summary:
Since we can match on multiple needles, we can drop the loop
from console_login and instead do it this way, which is simpler
and should work better on ARM (the timeouts will scale and
allow ARM to be slow here). Also move it to main_common as
there's no logical reason for it to be a class method.
Also remove the `check` arg. `check` was only set to 0 by two
tests, _console_shutdown and anacondatest's _post_fail_hook.
For _console_shutdown, I think I just wanted to give it the
best possible chance of succeeding. But we're really not going
to lose anything significant by checking, the only case where
check=>0 would've helped is if the 'good' needle had stopped
matching, and all sorts of other tests will fail in that case.
anacondatest was only using it to save a screenshot of whatever
was on the tty if it didn't reach a root console, which doesn't
seem that useful, and we'll get screenshots from check_screen
and assert_screen anyway.
Test Plan:
Run all tests, check they behave as expected and
none inappropriately fails on console login.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D1016
As with the text install test, there's an additional choice on
the 'Time settings' path compared to whatever image garret
developed the test on; right after 'Time settings' you have to
pick 'Set timezone' or 'Configure NTP servers'. So adjust the
test to handle this, just like we did there.
Summary:
I started out wanting to fix an issue I noticed today where
graphical upgrade tests were failing because they didn't wait
for the graphical login screen properly; the test was sitting
at the 'full Fedora logo' state of plymouth for a long time,
so the current boot_to_login_screen's wait_still_screen was
triggered by it and the function wound up failing on the
assert_screen, because it was still some time before the real
login screen appeared.
So I tweaked the boot_to_login_screen implementation to work
slightly differently (look for a login screen match, *then* -
if we're dealing with a graphical login - wait_still_screen
to defeat the 'old GPU buffer showing login screen' problem
and assert the login screen again). But while working on it,
I figured we really should consolidate all the various places
that handle the bootloader -> login, we were doing it quite
differently in all sorts of different places. And as part of
that, I converted the base tests to use POSTINSTALL (and thus
go through the shared _wait_login tests) instead of handling
boot themselves. As part of *that*, I tweaked main.pm to not
require all POSTINSTALL tests have the _postinstall suffix on
their names, as it really doesn't make sense, and renamed the
tests.
Test Plan: Run all tests, see if they work.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D1015
I have a better fix for this coming, but it's a big change that
requires review, so for now, do this. The tests are actually
failing because the 30 second wait_still_screen is too short(!)
- it's triggering while the test is sitting at the 'full Fedora
logo' bootsplash screen then doing a 30 second assert_screen
graphical_login, which is failing because it actually takes
more than 60 seconds to get from the 'full F' screen to the
login screen. So let's just make the wait_still_screen 45
seconds for now.
use 'ps' output for Xorg and Xwayland. We'd need some new
openQA var to get this right by 'guessing', as it's vt1 for
Workstation when running live - so long as autologin worked -
but vt2 after install. We'd need a var or some other thing to
detect which case we're running in. LIVE doesn't do it, it's
set even when running a post-install test from a live image.
So instead let's just do it a bit more cleverly. This also
gives us a bit of insurance against changes in GDM, SDDM etc.
behaviour, so long as Xwayland or Xorg is running (and we can
add additional processes to the list, like gnome-shell, if
needed/appropriate). We assume the *final* listed process -
i.e. the most recently-started one - will be the desktop;
this covers gdm's behaviour of starting up on vt1 then running
the user session on vt2. We can make this function more complex
and add args if we ever get to the point where we have multi-
user tests running or anything (e.g. allow to pass a username
and only look for that user's processes).
Landing without review as this broke the live variant of the
test on Workstation in production (kinda not sure why it worked
in testing, or I didn't notice that it failed, but never mind).
I've tested it on staging.
When a package is unsigned, KDE will prompt for authentication.
Let's handle this. But count it as a soft fail, because
puiterwijk claims that Rawhide packages will be autosigned
from next week, so this *should* not happen and would indicate
an unsigned package in the repos. We make the KDE 'update
complete' needle area smaller because the wider area includes
some transparency and so will only match if the update applet
is open; this area will match whether it's open (no auth case)
or not open (auth case - the applet seems to disappear after
you provide the password in the auth prompt).
Pushing without review as the test is in production so I want
to make sure it works correctly.
(Also, hey, check out that array match for assert_screen and
that match_has_tag! This is gonna make some things so much
easier...thanks upstream)
Summary:
this more or less covers desktop_error_checks and desktop_
update_notification, though it can't really distinguish
between them easily. All we know is that if both the live and
postinstall versions of this test pass, both of those tests
pass. Any fails will have to be investigated manually.
Test Plan:
Run the tests for both KDE and Workstation, see
what happens. Workstation will fail for F25 and Rawhide at
present, due to SELinux/abrt notifications.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D1004
Summary:
Very similar to the CLI update test, but using the desktops'
update applications. This is based off the CLI update test
branch as it uses the shared functions that branch introduced.
We do not use the fake update packages, as they don't really
do anything useful for these tests; for dnf they can help us
distinguish between issues with the dnf mechanism and issues
with the repos, but we can't really tell that in the graphical
case. So we only use the python3-kickstart package here.
Test Plan:
Run the test on both KDE and GNOME and ensure it
performs as intended. I've been testing it on staging, so you
can see it there.
Reviewers: jskladan, garretraziel
Reviewed By: garretraziel
Subscribers: tflink
Differential Revision: https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D1010
