generated from sig_core/wiki-template
Upload files to 'docs/guidelines' #3
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
No description provided.
Delete Branch "alangm-openqa-manual-install"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Adds document openqa_manual_install.md giving a well tested procedure for manual install of openqa for Rockylinux together with a general introduction to the process to be followed.
This will be useful for those who initially wish to go through the install steps manually rather than use the various install scripts that are available.
This is a first time pr here so not sure if it will work.
The Guide is not showing up in guidelines because the .pages navigation is not configured, like this here
Do you want to let it show up? :)
@ -0,0 +133,4 @@
### Helper Scripts
see:
https://github.com/rocky-linux/os-autoinst-distri-rocky/tree/develop/scripts
Could you make this a Markdown link?
Done, see below.
Thanks Lukas!
Beside these 2 a very solid guide maybe some formatting cleanup that is needed 🙂
@lumarel your comments:
"Do you want to let it show up? :)"
yes, I'll have a try at it. I'm experimenting a lot here so we'll see how it goes.
Resolved I think?
Did you have specific "formatting cleanup that is needed"?
I have a few things myself that I'd like to sort out.
Hey Alan, it looks like the issue Lukas pointed out is still occurring. I think you need to update
docs/guidelines/.pages
to make sure your page shows up (seedocs/.pages
for examples)The two other changes I suggested in the testing meeting:
You have the user using root to make any changes to the local copy of the testing repository, which is one way to do this. Another way is to add the user to the
geekotest
group, like so:The other thing was that you advise using
sudo vi
to edit files, which will work. I've always been recommended to usesudoedit
instead. Neither of these are blockers by any means, just enhancement suggestions. Whether you decide to make these two changes or not, this documentation looks good to me.@raktajino Thank you for your comments. I didn't know about sudoedit so another TIL.
I tried to use geekotest group entry in the past and had some difficulty with it. I take your point though and I will look at it again and put it in when I get it working.
Keep the comments coming please, they are most appreciated. I'm certain to get more TIL's that way. :-)
I have edited the code in line with @raktajino comments above. I have still to add the navigation details mentioned above @lumarel and will do soon.
Thanks you all for your comments.
Getting close but section on createhdds is very important and is still to be added.
Will also need some description of openqa-cli api -X POST... to get people started.
WIP: Upload files to 'docs/guidelines'to Upload files to 'docs/guidelines'@alangm You've done a lot of work on this (THANK YOU!) and while I don't want my feedback to block some of the formatting changes (eg. proper representation of openQA) are important. I will approve when the blocking changes are made while the non-blocking ones could be tackled (or not) later.
blocking
openqa
within commands (eg.openqa-cli
) or paths (eg./var/lib/openqa/...
)VARIABLES
definition document. NOTE: There is more than one of these going to different locations.createhdds
,openqa-cli
,/var/lib/openqa/factory/hdd/fixed
)QEMUCPU
)non-blocking
templates.fif.json
which is a Fedora construct for configuring openQA fromos-autoinst-distri-fedora
that we inherited. The docstring infifloader.py
describing this is a lot to take in... I wonder if it wouldn't be useful to digest / extract some of that text and reference the source in this section?Thank you @tcooper your review and comments are appreciated. I'll get the changes in soon.
@tcooper Thank you for your comments, I was thinking along the same lines for a lot of them.
Your blocking comments are agreed and implemented but I will need a wee bit more time to address the non-blocking ones.
I do agree with these and I will make the necessary changes once I've had a chance to get to it.
If any of the current changes are not what you wished to see, or indeed if you spot any errors, please let me know and I'll edit to suit.
Looks like that merge wasn't signed as Trevor said it wouldn't be. Next time I'll merge from the command line and see if that ends up with a signed merge commit from me.